Skip to main content

Unlocking the potential of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: an insight into green synthesis, optimizations, characterizations, and multifunctional applications

Abstract

This comprehensive review explores the emergence of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs) as versatile nanomaterials, particularly exploring their biogenic synthesis methods through different biological entities such as plants, bacteria, fungi, viruses, and algae. These biological entities provide eco-friendly, cost-effective, biocompatible, and rapid methods for TiO2-NP synthesis to overcome the disadvantages of traditional approaches. TiO2-NPs have distinctive properties, including high surface area, stability, UV protection, and photocatalytic activity, which enable diverse applications. Through detailed analysis, this review demonstrates significant applications of green fabricated TiO2-NPs in biomedicine, explicitly highlighting their antimicrobial, anticancer, and antioxidant activities, along with applications in targeted drug delivery, photodynamic therapy, and theragnostic cancer treatment. Additionally, the review underscores their pivotal significance in biosensors, bioimaging, and agricultural applications such as nanopesticides and nanofertilizers. Also, this review proves valuable incorporation of TiO2-NPs in the treatment of contaminated soil and water with various environmental contaminants such as dyes, heavy metals, radionuclides, agricultural effluents, and pathogens. These comprehensive findings establish the foundation for future innovations in nanotechnology, underscoring the importance of further investigating bio-based synthetic approaches and bioactivity mechanisms to enhance their efficacy and safety across healthcare, agricultural, and environmental applications.

Introduction

In the 1980s, nanotechnology breakthroughs allowed scientists to manipulate atomic particles, enabling the engineering of nanoscale materials and structures. This innovation has applications in biomaterials, organic chemistry, and medicine [1]. This microscopy technology has reshaped modern medicine, introducing new approaches to drug delivery, body imaging, and disease detection with remarkable precision [2]. Nanotechnology has progressed challenging diagnoses and advanced understanding of disease mechanisms. Due to their molecular-level size, nanoparticles enhance treatments in both in-vivo and in-vitro lab settings. These microscopic carriers facilitated targeted drug delivery in high-risk areas, delivering exact doses while minimizing side effects [3].

Nanoparticles (NPs) possess significant advantages compared to bulk materials, including expanded surface area, elevated surface energy, constrained nano environment, and decreased imperfections [4]. Characteristics of nanoparticles, like size, shape, chemical makeup, surface architecture, and crystallinity, heavily influence their potential uses across many areas, including pharmacological domains such as antimicrobial [5, 6], antioxidant [7], anticancer [8], anti-tyrosinase potential [9] as well as industrial and optoelectronics domains [10].

In this regard, transition metals have garnered significant attention due to two key factors: firstly, their atomic electronic configuration features incomplete d-orbitals, and secondly, their ability to undergo fluctuating oxidation phases. Consequently, their intrinsic physicochemical properties can be tailored for a vast array of applications across the fields of natural sciences and materials engineering [11]. Furthermore, these metallic elements can generate a diverse range of oxide compounds, which present promising prospects for expanding the frontiers of research across burgeoning domains such as environmental studies, agricultural applications, medical advancements, cosmetic formulations, energy storage solutions, fuel cell technologies, semiconductor device development, sensor innovations, and catalytic processes [12]. Particle size is a pivotal factor that significantly influences the fundamental properties of any material. Firstly, with regard to structural properties, bulk oxides exhibit robustness and low phase stability, whereas nanoparticle oxides can readily undergo structural transformations and possess low surface free energy due to their reduced particle size [13]. Secondly, concerning electronic properties, the surfaces of bulk oxides are extended due to the distribution of ionic charge as compared to the nanoscale structure [14]. Thirdly, the band gap of bulk oxides is broad. In contrast, NP oxides exhibit a low band gap, enhancing conductivity and chemical reactivity [15]. Consequently, by modulating the particle size, materials’ structural, electronic, physical, and chemical properties can be tailored to meet specific requirements across various applications. Therefore, as a result, oxide nanoparticles, owing to their size limitations and abundant density of corner surface sites, possess the ability to exhibit unique physical and chemical properties [16].

Due to the high production of titanium oxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs), approximately 10 × 103 tons in 2011, it is considered the major and promising industrial substance [17]. TiO2-NPs owe their widespread use to their economical production costs, superior chemical stability, elevated refractive index, robust oxidation capabilities, and the existence of oxygen vacancies in their crystalline lattice [18]. The substantial band gap exhibited by TiO2-NPs is a pivotal property that renders them suitable for semiconductor applications in the optical industry [19]. Attributed to the exceptional electrical and ionic properties of TiO2-NPS, these materials can be further customized and tailored to be utilized in the fields of sensor technology and electronic device fabrication [20].

TiO2-NPS manifests as a white, water-insoluble powder with a remarkably high refractive index of 2.4, rendering it suitable for pigments in the paint industry [21]. Notably, TiO2 naturally occurs in three distinct polymorphic forms - rutile, anatase, and brookite - each possessing a crystalline structure. These polymorphs find extensive applications in the gemstone industry [22]. Furthermore, owing to their unique crystalline nature, the physical and chemical properties of TiO2-NPs can be tailored by modifying the ratio of these polymorphic forms, thereby expanding their scope of applications across various sectors. The remarkable versatility of TiO2-NPs is highlighted by their extensive and successful applications across diverse domains. These nanoparticles have proven invaluable in the field of sensors [23]. While also serving as photocatalysts for the decomposition of wastewater pollutants [24]. Furthermore, their antimicrobial and antibacterial properties [25] allow for their use as food additives and in cosmetic products [26].

In this review, we delve into different eco-friendly, safe, and sustainable synthesis techniques for TiO2-NPs production. This eco-friendly approach offers significant advantages over conventional industrial methods, notably improved reagent handling and enhanced process safety [27]. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, we have endeavored to provide a comprehensive summary of the various biomedical applications of TiO2-NPs, encompassing their antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, and anticancer with other biotechnological and environmental applications. This review aims to elucidate our current understanding within this field and inspire the exploration of more sophisticated nanostructures in the forthcoming years. By elucidating the synthesis methods and potential applications, we strive to pave the way for future advancements and innovations in the realm of TiO2-NPs.

Synthesis methods

Conventional methods

Conventional methods for synthesizing metal oxides can be broadly categorized into two distinct approaches: top-down and bottom-up. The top-down approach involves breaking down bulk macroscopic particles into nanoscopic particles (1 mm-xµ) through various physical methods. This approach is relatively straightforward than the bottom-up but also encounters monodispersed challenges and limited particle control. Various physical techniques involved, such as milling, etching, sputtering, pulse laser ablation, and evaporation-condensation techniques [28].

On the other hand, the bottom-up approach relies on a self-assembly process, whereby atomic nuclei are joined together to form nanosized particles (0.1 nm-xµ). This approach facilitates the easy manipulation of nanoparticle dimensions and morphology, resulting in superior homogeneity. However, its drawbacks include scalability, strict resource constraints, and multi-phase implementation. It encompasses several techniques and processes, including chemical vapor deposition, sol-gel processes, hydrothermal methods, sonochemical techniques, flame spraying, spinning, and green synthesis methods [29]. Notably, while the top-down approach focuses on reducing the size of bulk materials to the nanoscale, the bottom-up approach builds nanoparticles from the ground up, starting with atomic or molecular precursors [30]. The choice between these approaches depends on several factors, such as the desired material properties, cost-effectiveness, and scalability requirements.

Researchers have developed a wide range of chemical and physical approaches to synthesize nanoparticles with diverse geometries, enabling their application across numerous fields. Among the novel techniques employed for achieving these distinct nanoparticle geometries, a clear distinction can be drawn between lithography-based techniques and non-lithographic methods [31]. The lithography techniques, which include photolithography, ion beam lithography, microcontact printing, dip pen lithography, and nanoimprint lithography, involve patterning materials on a surface through various lithographic processes [32]. These techniques allow for precise control over the geometric features of the nanoparticles. On the other hand, non-lithographic techniques encompass methods such as ball milling, a mechanical process for grinding and mixing materials, evaporation-condensation, and electrochemical synthesis, which utilizes electrochemical reactions to synthesize nanoparticles [33]. These non-lithographic approaches offer alternative routes for nanoparticle synthesis, potentially enabling unique geometric configurations.

Nonetheless, the methods mentioned earlier frequently necessitate multiple processing steps, stringent control over variables such as pressure, pH, and temperature, and the employment of expensive equipment and toxic chemicals. Furthermore, these techniques often result in the generation of toxic by-products that pose a significant threat to ecosystems [34]. In light of these challenges, there is an urgent need to develop eco-friendly approaches utilizing biological and green synthesis techniques.

Biogenic synthesis

Considering a broader perspective, biological approaches embrace the concept of “green synthesis” for the production of nanoparticles [35]. This method can be further categorized into two distinct pathways: (a) phytosynthesis, where the synthesis process is facilitated by leveraging the capabilities of plants and their extracted compounds, and (b) microbial synthesis, which involves harnessing the synthetic potential of microorganisms such as bacteria, algae, fungi, yeasts, and actinomycetes, utilizing extracts derived from these organisms. The phytosynthetic route exploits the natural ability of plants to synthesize materials by harnessing their varied metabolites. At the same time, the microbial pathway capitalizes on the metabolic machinery of various microbial species to generate the desired metal and its oxides-nanoparticles. These biological methods offer an environmentally friendly and sustainable alternative to conventional synthesis techniques [36, 37].

Green synthesis surpasses conventional processes by integrating non-toxic biological organisms, natural acids, and water as solvents and safer catalysts while replacing hazardous chemical substances. This eco-green strategy significantly enhances reaction efficiency with faster synthesis times and higher yields for industrial scalability (Table 1). Concurrently, it generates substantial product yields of biocompatible nanoparticles that are imperative for use within the medical and pharmaceutical domains [38].

The green synthesis approach faces several key challenges that can potentially obstruct its successful implementation. Firstly, the optimization processes required to synthesize nanoparticles with specific size distributions and morphological characteristics are inherently tied to their intended biological functions (Table 1). Secondly, deciphering the distinct role played by each constituent compound involved in the biofabrication process mandates a comprehensive chemical analysis of the filtered biological biomass [39].

Table 1 Summarizing the advantages and disadvantages of biogenic NPs synthesis

Phytosynthetic routes

The synthesis of nanoparticles facilitated by plants is considered more stable compared to the synthesis mediated by microbes. The process of producing nanoparticles using plant extracts is straightforward, economical, and yields a high quantity while adhering to sustainable practices [41]. These plant extracts can be derived from various plant parts, such as flowers, roots, seeds, or leaves. Among the different plant parts, leaves are more commonly utilized for obtaining extracts, as they are abundant in metabolites [42]. Leaves offer a more viable option for deriving extracts without generating toxic byproducts. These processes involving leaf extracts are straightforward, economical, and non-toxic, making them easily accessible and compatible for NPs production with appropriate quantities suitable for industrial and environmental sectors [43].

Significantly, plant extracts are abundant in polyphenolic compounds that function as potent reducing agents, thereby facilitating the reduction of metal ions and consequently leading to the formation of nanoparticles [44]. Additionally, the reduction of these metallic ions can be prompted by various cellular components such as amines, carbonyls, phenolic compounds, pigments, terpenoids, and alkaloids [45]. This synthesis process is driven by redox reactions involving metallic ions and secreted molecules like sugars, carbohydrates, and proteins. However, elucidating the precise mechanism of action remains challenging due to the vast chemical diversity of the metabolites involved in the reduction process [46]. Nevertheless, experimental parameters such as pH, temperature, reactant concentration, and reaction time play a pivotal role in determining the physical-chemical properties of the resultant nanoparticles [47]. Moreover, the biodiversity and availability of different plant families, each with unique profiles of primary and secondary metabolites, contribute significantly to producing various biogenic nanoparticles with important antimicrobial applications [48].

The desired plant part undergoes thorough washing and cleaning, followed by boiling in a solvent like ethanol (C2H6O) or dH2O and subsequent filtration (Fig. 1). The resultant filtered solution, rich in plant extracts, serves as a reducing agent. To this filtered solution, a suitable metallic or metallic oxide precursor such as titanium tetraisopropoxide (Ti(OCH(CH3)2)4), titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4), or titanyl hydroxide (TiO(OH)2) for TiO2-NPs synthesis is introduced under constant agitation [49]. The reaction mixture starts vigorously when the TiO2 precursor salt is combined with the plant extract, and a color change indicates the first sign of nanoparticle synthesis [50]. This initial observation can then be confirmed afterward by spectroscopic techniques, leading to the formation and characterization of the desired TiO2-Nps [51].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart showing plant-mediated production of TiO2-NPs starting from plant extract to applications

A major portion of green synthesis studies utilize leaf extracts, as leaves are abundant reservoirs of metabolites. For example, Extracts from Moringa oleifera leaves facilitated the synthesis of TiO2-NPs around 100 nm in size with varying shapes, exhibiting promising wound healing capabilities [52]. Another TiO2-NP was synthesized using the leaf extract of Hibiscus rosasinensis L. and exhibited potent antimicrobial activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains [53]. In another study, TiO2-NPs derived from Nyctanthes leaf extracts possessed a uniform spherical shape and ranged in size from approximately 100 to 150 nm. These biogenic NPs demonstrated significant pediculicidal (lice-killing), acaricidal (mite-killing), and larvicidal (larva-killing) properties [54]. Similarly, the leaf extract of Calotropis gigantea L. was reported to facilitate the reduction of TiO2 to nanoparticles within a span of 6 h, attributed to the presence of primary amines in the extract. The bio-mediated TiO2-NPs exhibited promising acaricidal activity against the larvae of Rhipicephalus microplus and Haemaphysalis bispinosa [55].

The synthesis of TiO2-NPs has also been reported using the aqueous leaf extract of the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus (L.). The aliphatic alcohols and amines present in the extract contributed to the formation of TiO2-NPs with irregular morphologies and particle sizes ranging between 25 and 110 nm [56]. Notably, the variation in size and morphology observed among the reported studies is influenced by factors such as reaction temperature, time, and the source of the plant extract [57]. Thus, optimizing these parameters can lead to improvements in the synthesis mechanism [58]. Furthermore, a wide array of propitious plant extracts remains to be explored for synthesizing TiO2-NPs. Table 2 shows the green synthesis of TiO2-NPs using plant extracts regarding their sizes, shapes, and applications.

Table 2 Examples of some plants-derived TiO2-NPs and their applications

Microbial synthesis

The green synthesis of NPs follows a bottom-up strategy, where NPs form through the oxidation/reduction of metallic ions facilitated by biomolecules secreted by microorganism entities. These biomolecules, including enzymes, proteins, sugars, carbohydrates, and others, play a crucial role in driving the redox processes that lead to the generation of nanoparticles [88]. Despite extensive research, a comprehensive understanding of the nanoparticle synthesis mechanism driven by microorganisms remains elusive as each type of microorganism interacts with metallic ions through various pathways [89]. The biochemical processes and interaction dynamics of a specific microorganism, coupled with environmental factors such as temperature and pH, ultimately influence the geometric parameters and form of the resultant nanoparticles [90].

The formation of nanoparticles can occur through either intracellular or extracellular mechanisms, contingent upon the specific type of microorganism involved [91]. Researchers have leveraged the potential of living cell extracts to pursue biological nanoparticle synthesis. The subsequent sections will concisely explore the primary biological pathways employed for this synthesis.

Bacterial-mediated TiO2-NPs biosynthesis

Bacteria are favored for nanoparticle synthesis due to their relatively undemanding conditions, uncomplicated purification processes, and prolific generation. Consequently, these microorganisms have emerged as extensively studied " nanomaterial production hubs“ [36]. Depending on their specific characteristics, various bacterial species can synthesize these NPs intracellularly or extracellularly (Table 3). The bacterial synthesis of TiO2-NPs is aided by their natural defense mechanisms, allowing them to adapt to environmental changes and resist certain metals. This process can occur through three primary methods: using whole cells, supernatants, or extracts. Supernatants, obtained after centrifuging bacterial cultures, contain various bioactive compounds such as enzymes, proteins, amino acids, polysaccharides, and carbohydrates, which are utilized as biocatalysts for NPs production [92]. This bacterial-mediated approach offers a versatile and efficient method, capitalizing on these microorganisms’ inherent properties and adaptability.

The biosynthesis of TiO2-NPs from Ti3+ ions (titanium precursors) by bacteria occurs through a three-step process: trapping, bioreduction, and capping. Initially, bacteria in the aqueous solution or surrounding medium trap Ti3+ ions. Subsequently, enzymes and proteins facilitate the reduction of these trapped ions into TiO2-NPs. Research has shown that microbial proteins containing functional groups such as –NH2, –SH, –COOH, and –OH plays a crucial role in stabilizing the synthesized TiO2-NPs [93]. These groups provide binding sites for Ti3+ ions and act as capping or stabilizing agents. The reduction of Ti3+ ions to NPs occurs either on the cell wall or within the bacterial intramembrane space. This process involves electron transfer from reduced compounds to inorganic compounds, promoting bacterial bioreduction of NPs. Finally, various bacterial biomolecules cap the reduced TiO2-NPs as natural stabilizing agents. This capping step is essential for maintaining NP stability, a critical factor in their synthesis and application [94].

Ti3+ (titanium salts) → Bacteria-Ti3+ ( Trapping).

Bacteria-Ti3+ + e→ TiO2​-NPs (Bioreduction)

TiO2​-NPs + microbial functional groups (–NH2, –SH, –COOH, –OH) → Capped TiO2​-NPs (Capping).

Among bacterial metabolites, exopolysaccharides (EPSs), which are heterogeneous organic biopolymers [95, 96] secreted into the extracellular environment [97] and have a vital function in providing protective microenvironments for bacteria [98, 99], enhancing their tolerance towards biotic and abiotic stresses while facilitating bacterial colonization [100, 101]. In biogenic nanoparticles, EPSs exhibit intriguing characteristics. One notable property is mucoadhesion, which facilitates neutral coating with low surface energy and prevents the recognition of non-specific protein receptors. Moreover, EPSs can adsorb metal cations onto their surface, a trait that aids in stabilizing and biosynthesizing metal nanoparticles. Their robust reducing and stabilizing capabilities make EPSs an attractive alternative biogenic substrate for synthesizing nanoparticles [102]. Upon interaction between metal ions and EPSs containing reducing sugars, the metal ions undergo chelation, followed by their reduction and stabilization facilitated by various functional moieties. Prominently, polyanionic groups, chiefly -COOH and -OPO32−, are well-documented to partake in reducing and stabilizing metal nanoparticles. Furthermore, electrostatic interactions between metal cationic species and anionic EPS groups like -COOH and -OPO32− have been cited as advantageous for nanoparticle synthesis. Among these functional entities, -OH, -COOH, -OPO32−, hemiacetal, and amino terminals have been proposed to reduce metal ions from precursor salts, yielding the corresponding nanoparticles. Notably, -OH groups coordinate with metal ions, whereas their oxidation to form carbonyl and -COOH groups is pivotal during the reduction process and nanoparticle formation [103]. Moreover, the abundance of -OH and hemiacetal end groups in EPSs facilitates the reduction and stabilization of nanoparticles, rendering them more suitable for diverse applications. Additionally, monosaccharides like glucose, galactose, mannose, and fructose have been mentioned to reduce metal ions, contributing to the mechanisms involved in nanoparticle synthesis observed with other EPSs [104].

Also, Actinomycetes have the ability to produce a diverse array of secondary metabolites, have emerged as promising sources for the biosynthesis of nanoparticles with desirable surface characteristics and size control [105]. These microorganisms possess the remarkable capability to facilitate the production of metallic and metal oxide NPs through either intracellular or extracellular methodologies [106] (Table 3). The extracellular approach has garnered significant commercial interest due to its advantage of minimizing polydispersity, a crucial factor in nanoparticle synthesis [107]. Notably, actinomycetes are a class of high-content guanine and cytosine microorganisms primarily exploited for their antibiotic production capabilities [108]. However, their versatility extends beyond antibiotics, as several researchers have successfully synthesized TiO2-NPs by harnessing the metabolic pathways of these remarkable microorganisms [109]. This further highlights the potential of actinomycetes as a valuable resource for the green synthesis of nanoparticles with diverse applications.

Among the recent examples, one study reported the synthesis of spherical-shaped titanium TiO2-NPs, ranging in size from 30 to 70 nm, using Streptomyces sp. HCl. The developed TiO2-NPs were tested as antimicrobials against various pathogenic microorganisms, including Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus niger. The researchers concluded that the synthesized TiO2-NPs exhibited higher antimicrobial properties against bacterial species compared to fungal species [110]. Another study reported the synthesis of TiO2-NPs using the marine actinobacteria Streptomyces bluensis as the biological source. The precursor for the nanoparticle synthesis was Ti(OH)4. The resulting spherical TiO2-NPs exhibited an average size of 37.54 nm and exhibited high potential to degrade azo dyes, including AR-79 and AR-80, with percentages of 84% and 85%, respectively [111]. Table 3 shows some bacterial and actinomycetes species that were utilized for TiO2-NP synthesis.

Table 3 Bacterial and actinomycetes species-mediated biosynthesis of TiO2-NPs showing promising biomedical and biotechnological applications
Fungal-mediated TiO2-NPs biosynthesis

Fungi have gained widespread nanoparticle biosynthesis adoption due to their metabolites’ remarkable efficacy in fabricating diverse nanoparticles. They represent a valuable addition to the repertoire of microorganisms employed for nanoparticle production. The extensive utilization of various fungal species can be attributed to their capacity to secrete substantial quantities of proteins or enzymes, coupled with their ease of handling in laboratory settings [125]. The utilization of fungi for synthesizing metallic nanoparticles has garnered substantial attention due to their possessing certain advantageous traits surpassing other organisms. The ability to readily scale up and streamline downstream processes, the economic viability, and the presence of mycelia with an augmented surface area constitute valuable advantages that warrant due consideration [126]. Furthermore, fungi have gained heightened interest owing to their involvement in the biological synthesis of metallic nanomaterials, facilitated by their exceptional tolerance and remarkable ability to bioaccumulate metals [127] (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Promising characteristics of fungi as a green tool for NPs synthesis

The synthesis of nanoparticles employing fungi and their biotechnological applications, particularly in medicine, are encompassed within the realm of myco-nanotechnology. This scientific term, representing the convergence of “mycology” and “nanotechnology,” holds significant potential due to the vast diversity and range of fungal species [128]. Fungi can form nanoparticles in diverse structures spanning mesoscale to nanoscale dimensions via enzymatic reduction, either extracellularly or intracellularly, and through biomimetic mineralization processes. Their extensive scalability has led to a distinct preference for their utilization in nanoparticle synthesis, exemplified by techniques such as thin solid substrate fermentation. Owing to the remarkable secretory capabilities of fungi, producing abundant quantities of extracellular enzymes or proteins becomes viable [129]. Furthermore, the economic feasibility and sustainability of employing biomass present another advantage for the implementation of a green approach, enabled by fungal entities or byproducts, in the fabrication of metallic nanomaterials [130]. Here are some examples of different fungal species used for the biosynthesis of TiO2-NPs, referring to their activities (Table 4).

Yeasts, a class of fungi belonging to the ascomycetes group, have demonstrated remarkable potential for the synthesis of nanoparticles. Biological processes possess a superior ability to control the morphology of materials. During the logarithmic growth phase, the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe facilitated the synthesis of semiconductor nanocrystals [126]. Nanoparticles synthesized extracellularly by yeasts offer a wide range of advantages, as the protein-mediated interactions between the yeasts and nanoparticles facilitate subsequent downstream reactions and modifications [131]. The entire yeast family exhibits the remarkable capability of aggregating various heavy metals. They can sequester substantial amounts of toxic metal ions. Numerous studies have concluded that the mechanisms employed by these species to counteract the toxic effects of heavy metals involve the extracellular production of polysaccharides or peptides. These biomolecules play a crucial role in either managing the cell’s permeability barrier against heavy metals or actively effluxing them from the cell [132]. For direct intracellular delivery of metal ions, yeast cells need to be disrupted to avoid negative or lethal consequences. The toxicity to cells can be mitigated by either maximizing the retention of metal ions within the cells or by exposing them to metals that do not possess the same level of toxicity as lead, mercury, and cadmium ions [133].

The significant variations observed in size, particle distribution, monodispersity, and characteristics of the synthesized nanoparticles can be attributed to the diverse mechanisms employed by different yeast strains from various families for nanoparticle formation. In yeast cells, a detoxification mechanism involving glutathione (GSH) and two classes of metal-binding proteins, namely metallothioneins and phytochelatins (PC), is utilized to facilitate the formation of nanoparticles [89]. In most yeast species, these molecules (GSH, metallothioneins, and PC) facilitated the formation pathway of nanoparticles and stabilized the resulting compounds. The resistance mechanism was defined as the ability of yeast cells to convert the absorbed metal ions into non-toxic polymer complexes. The nanoparticles formed by yeasts are commonly referred to as “semiconductor nanocrystals” or “quantum semiconductor nanocrystals”. Recent research has revealed that yeasts can also synthesize various other types of nanoparticles [126]. More examples of biosynthesis of TiO2-NPs using yeast strains were summarized in (Table 4).

Table 4 Examples of biosynthesis of TiO2-NPs using different fungal species with reference to their size, shape, and activities
Viruses-mediated TiO2-NPs biosynthesis

Viruses provide an important illustration of how nanosized particles can be synthesized. So far, viruses have produced nanotubes and nanorods [148]. Research studies and experiments have demonstrated that plant viruses and certain bacteriophages can be readily isolated and subjected to further processing [149]. However, not all virus components can synthesize nanoparticles, and the underlying reasons for this need to be thoroughly investigated and understood [150]. One study reported the successful formation of chalcogenide nanocrystals within genetically modified virus-like particles [151]. Leveraging the self-assembly capabilities of the genetically modifiable M13 virus, TiO2 nanostructures with controlled sizes between 20 and 40 nm were synthesized under ambient conditions, enabling their homogeneous distribution and percolated networks suitable for exploiting their promising photo-electrochemical properties [152] (Table 5).

Algae-mediated fabrication of TiO2-NPs

Algae are capable of accumulating significant quantities of heavy metals, an attribute that enables them to be utilized for the biosynthesis of metallic and metal oxide NPs [153]. Algae have found widespread application in the synthesis of TiO2-NPs due to their ready availability and effectiveness. Beyond just enzymes and proteins, these phytosynthetic organisms also possess carotenoids and various pigments involved in photosynthesis, which contribute significantly to the physio-assisted (algae-mediated) production of TiO2-NPs. However, algal-based synthesis methods for these nanoparticles are not as well-established compared to bacterial synthesis routes [154]. Additionally, algae can synthesize nanoparticles utilizing their extracts or supernatants, which are rich in secondary metabolites. These extracts obviate the need for live algal cultures in nanoparticle synthesis [155].

In one study, TiO2-NPs were synthesized using the algae Spirulina platensis [156]. Moreover, another study reported the synthesis of spherical-shaped TiO2-NPs ranging from 90 to 150 nm in size by utilizing an extract from S. platensis [157]. Also, TiO2-NPs were synthesized from the seaweed Sargassum wightii, and their efficacy was evaluated for killing the larvae of vectors that transmit malaria and filariasis [158]. Another investigation involved the synthesis of negatively charged TiO2-NPs with cubic, square, and spherical shapes ranging approximately 50–90 nanometers in size, utilizing Sargassum myriocystum as the source material. Additionally, the researchers in this study assessed the antimicrobial properties of the synthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticles [159]. Table 5 summarizes some examples of the biosynthesis of TiO2-NPs using different algal strains.

Table 5 Examples of the biosynthesis of TiO2-NPs using viruses and algae with noted size, shape, and applications

Factors modulating biosynthesis

The shaping and resizing of metallic and their oxide nanomaterials seem to be influenced by their environmental conditions or altered by the presence of functional molecules [165]. Researchers have explored modifying various synthesis parameters, such as thermal conditions, acidity/alkalinity, incubation duration, oxygenation, ionic strength, redox state, mixing proportions, and irradiation, to optimize the production of nanoparticles. Both chemical and physical factors govern the dimensions and morphology of nanoparticles. Achieving optimal conditions for metal ion concentration, thermal environment, and acidity/alkalinity is crucial during the synthesis process [166]. The properties of nanoparticles formed via biological methods are significantly influenced by the incubation time of the reaction medium. Prolonged incubation can lead to variations in characteristics, potentially due to particle aggregation or shrinkage [46]. Consequently, the particles’ self-life or stability may impact their functional potential over extended periods. Therefore, in addition to the synthesis parameters like thermal conditions, acidity/alkalinity, substrate concentration, and exposure duration to the substrate, the incubation time is a crucial factor that governs the characteristics and potential of biologically synthesized nanoparticles [167]. Adjusting these synthesis parameters can modulate the rate of nanoparticle formation within cells and their eventual size to some extent. In the subsequent subsections, precursor concentration, temperature, and pH will be further explained, since these key parameters contribute to the optimization and the efficiency of the biogenic process as they significantly influence the nucleation rate, reaction kinetics, aggregation, and stabilization of the desired nanoparticle characteristics.

Effect of Precursor and reducing Agent concentrations on nanoparticle size and agglomeration

Precursor and reducing agent concentrations crucially determine the synthesized nanoparticles’ size [168]. Initially, excessive reducing agents bind to preformed nuclei, amplifying secondary ion reduction on their surfaces. This accelerates nanoparticle growth, yielding larger sizes at higher reactant concentrations [169]. However, an overly high reducing agent concentration adversely promotes nanoparticle bridging and aggregation. This arises when an abundance of metal ions adsorbs onto nuclei surfaces, facilitating uncontrolled secondary reduction and agglomerated growth [170]. Therefore, striking the right balance in reactant concentrations is vital to avoid aggregation issues and achieve monodisperse nanoparticles with the desired size [171].

Temperature effects on nanoparticle size and dispersity

Temperature plays a crucial role in determining nanoparticle size during synthesis. Higher temperatures tend to promote nucleation, leading to the formation of numerous smaller nanoparticles. In contrast, lower temperatures favor slower growth processes, resulting in fewer but larger nanoparticles [172]. However, increasing the overall reaction temperature accelerates the total reaction rate [173]. Notably, temperature exhibits contrasting effects on the size under sufficient versus insufficient precursor conditions due to differing influences on nucleation and growth kinetic constants [174]. As temperature increases, the enhanced reduction rate consumes most metal ions in nuclei formation, hindering secondary reduction on preformed nuclei surfaces. Consequently, elevated temperatures yield smaller, highly dispersed nanoparticles with improved yield [175].

Influence of pH on nanoparticle size, shape, and Colloidal Stability

The pH during nanoparticle synthesis exerts a profound influence not only on the size but also on the shape of the resulting particles [176]. The pH governs the local surface characteristics of nanoparticles [177] by facilitating the protonation and deprotonation of molecular atoms during the nucleation and growth stages [178]. Notably, nanoparticles synthesized under lower pH conditions exhibit less regularity in shape and a tendency toward aggregation. However, by tailoring the pH conditions during synthesis, nanoparticles with the desired size and uniform shape can be produced [179]. Conversely, in the alkaline pH range, nanoparticles form a well-dispersed cluster distribution in the colloidal stage, thereby preventing aggregation [180].

Characterization of nanoparticles

The physicochemical characterization of synthesized nanoparticles is a crucial step that demands meticulous attention before their practical applications. Investigating properties such as size, shape, surface area, homogeneity, and stability provides valuable insights into these nanoscale systems, enabling better control over nanoparticle synthesis for commercial purposes [181]. Various characterization techniques are employed, each serving a distinct function [182]. The color change test offers a simple visual indication of nanoparticle formation. UV-visible spectrometry analyzes the optical properties and confirms the presence of nanoparticles. In the case of TiO2-NPs synthesized by bacteria, they exhibit UV-Vis absorption peaks in the range of 300–400 nm. Most of these peaks are observed between 350 and 400 nm, whereas in some cases, the peaks are found below 350 nm. This variation in peak position is attributed to the presence of different biomolecules involved in the synthesis process and the size and shape of the NPs, which affect their surface plasmon resonance. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) elucidates the chemical composition and identifies functional groups that facilitate the stabilization and surface modification/capping of the synthesized TiO2-NPs.

Electron microscopy techniques, including transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and field emission-SEM (FE-SEM), provide detailed visualization and structural analysis of nanoparticles. Also, they provide insights into the association of carbon-based biomolecules with the synthesized NPs [183]. In SEM, the non-metallic regions appear darker due to electron deficiency, while in TEM, these areas appear brighter compared to the darker titanium element. Additionally, the elemental analyzer integrated with electron microscopy facilitates the determination of the chemical composition and purity assessment of the synthesized TiO2-NPs. Complemented by data from (FTIR) and (XRD), electron microscopy can reveal the presence and nature of biomolecules associated with the TiO2-NPs [184].

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping reveals elemental composition and distribution within nanoparticles. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measures the size distribution and aggregation behavior of nanoparticles in solution [185].

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) is crucial for characterizing the synthesized TiO2-NPs as it determines their crystalline structure and phase composition. TiO2-NPs can exist in three different phases: anatase, rutile, and brookite. The anatase phase exhibits a sharp peak near two theta values (2θ) of 25–26°, while the rutile phase is identified by a peak around 2θ value of 27–28°. By analyzing the specific peak positions and intensities in the XRD pattern, the presence of these phases in the synthesized TiO2-NPs can be determined. Vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) evaluates their magnetic properties. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) assesses thermal stability and quantifies components within nanoparticle samples. Zeta potential reflects the surface charge of NPs, influencing their suspension stability. Higher absolute values imply enhanced stability through electrostatic repulsion. Contact angle measurements determine the extent to which a liquid spreads on a solid surface, providing insights into the surface energy and hydrophobicity of nanoparticles [186]. Moreover, the 2D shape and 3D shape were detected and investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM), whereas the chemistry of TiO2-NPs surface, state of chemical and electronics within NPs, and elemental composition were assessed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS) [187].

These techniques collectively offer comprehensive characterization, enabling researchers to thoroughly understand the synthesized nanoparticles and optimize their synthesis for diverse applications.

Biomedical and biotechnological applications of TiO2-NPs

Within the rapidly evolving landscape of nanotechnology, the realm of biomedical applications has witnessed remarkable progress fueled by extensive research endeavors. Nanoparticles have garnered significant attention due to their distinctive physicochemical properties, which render them advantageous across a diverse array of fields, including pharmaceutical formulations, diagnostic tools, personal care products, and electronic devices [188]. The unique characteristics inherent to nanomaterials, particularly their minuscule size ranging from 1 to 100 nm, heightened reactivity, and immense surface area, have unlocked novel avenues for exploration and innovation [189]. These properties facilitate their cellular entry and interaction with biomolecular and cellular pathways, rendering nanomaterials invaluable assets in the realm of drug therapeutics [190](Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Flowchart enumerates the biomedical and biotechnological applications of TiO2-NPs

TiO2 emerges as a highly versatile material, rendering it an attractive choice across a wide array of applications due to its remarkable mechanical and photochemical characteristics [191]. In the realm of cosmetics, TiO2 finds utility in formulating anti-aging and skin-brightening products, harnessing its unique characteristics [192]. Similarly, its optoelectronic properties make it a valuable component in the fabrication of devices and sensors within the electronics industry [193]. Furthermore, the medical field has embraced TiO2 for its potential in targeted drug delivery systems, antimicrobial activity, treatment of cancer cells, biosensors, dental treatment, anti-inflammatory activity, etc. (Fig. 3). The following subsections comprehensively explore some biomedical and biotechnological applications of TiO2-NPs, highlighting their remarkable versatility and vast potential across diverse domains.

Antioxidant activity

TiO2-NPs, especially those formed by plant extract that impaired various functional groups, showed high antioxidant activity to be utilized for decreasing the deleterious effects of free radical ions [194]. These TiO2-NPs were able to scavenge free radicals, such as 2,2′-casino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and 2,2-Diphenyl-1-(2,4,6-trinitrophenol) hydrazine-1-yl (DPPH), within a reduced timeframe, demonstrating their antioxidant capabilities (Table 6). TiO2-NPs are also reported to exhibit protective effects against reactive oxygen species (ROS). Plant-mediated synthesis methods result in TiO2-NPs with functional groups such as phenols and tannins, contributing to their stabilization and enhanced antioxidant potential. These functional groups present on the surface of the nanoparticles play a crucial role in scavenging free radicals and mitigating oxidative stress [195].

In a study, the green synthesis of TiO2-NPs using Psidium guajava (guava) leaf extract exhibited superior antioxidant activity compared to ascorbic acid. This enhanced antioxidant potential was attributed to the presence of phenolic compounds in the aqueous leaf extract (85.4 mg/g) and the synthesized TiO2-NPs (18.3 mg/g).

The phenolic content in the plant extract played a crucial role in the formation and stabilization of the nanoparticles, contributing to their remarkable antioxidant properties [196]. Similarly, Artemisia haussknechtii leaves synthesized TiO2-NPs with strong antioxidant properties. The synthesized NPs have been tested through various assays, indicating a remarkable DPPH scavenging activity of 68.43% at a concentration of 500 µg/ml. The reducing power of TiO2-NPs was greater than ascorbic acid (control), as determined by the reducing power assay to donate an electron [197]. In another study, TiO2 nanoparticles, produced using fruit peel agro-waste, possess antioxidant potential. The study utilized various scavenging assays such as DPPH free radical, H2O2 free radical, and NO, as well as the reducing power assay. The results showed that TiO2 nanoparticles exhibited dose-dependent antioxidant effects compared to ascorbic acid, which was used as a control [198].

Table 6 Antioxidant activity of green synthesized TiO2-NPs

Antimicrobial activity

Antibacterial activity

The indiscriminate use of antibiotics has resulted in the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacterial strains, which has become a significant cause for concern regarding food safety and human health [209]. In the quest for novel antibacterial agents, metal oxide nanoparticles have garnered significant interest from researchers, with biofilm formation being identified as a major factor contributing to antibiotic resistance [210]. Consequently, scientific investigations have shifted focus to explore the antimicrobial capabilities of nanoparticles composed of metals and metal oxides.

TiO2-NPs exhibit photocatalytic antimicrobial activity when exposed to UV irradiation with a wavelength below 385 nm. However, the effectiveness of this antimicrobial activity displayed by TiO2-NPs is contingent upon the thickness of the microbial cell surface [211]. TiO2-NPs exhibit antibacterial activity through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydroxyl radicals (OH-), superoxide anions (O2•-), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (Fig. 4). These ROS induce oxidative stress on the bacterial cell membrane, inducing lipid peroxidation in the plasma membrane’s unsaturated phospholipids. Consequently, the bacterial membrane sustains damage. Additionally, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2-NPs disrupts crucial biological processes within bacteria, including respiration, oxidative phosphorylation reactions, and the maintenance of semi-permeability [212]. Figure 4 presents various antibacterial mechanisms of TiO2-NPs used to inhibit bacterial growth.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Various antibacterial mechanisms of biogenic TiO2-NPs

A research investigation examined the impact of TiO2-NPs on biofilm formation by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) using a tissue culture plate method (Table 7). Among the 30 isolates evaluated, 22 demonstrated strong biofilm formation capabilities, while 2 exhibited weak biofilm formation. The study revealed that TiO2-NPs at a concentration of 500 µg/mL inhibited the growth of both strong and weak MRSA biofilm formers, suggesting the potential of TiO2-NPs as viable antibacterial options [213]. In another study, TiO2-NPs were employed in combination with antibiotics ceftazidime and cefotaxime against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The bacterial samples were isolated from sputum, pus, and bronchoalveolar lavage. Upon 1-hour UV light exposure, a bactericidal effect was observed at TiO2-NPs concentrations exceeding 350 µg/ml. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of TiO2-NPs were six-fold higher compared to the antibiotics. Consequently, the combined application of antibiotics and TiO2-NPs synergistically augmented the antimicrobial activity [214].

Recently, the synthesis of TiO2-NPs-based nanocomposites is characterized by their high activity in the biomedical and food packaging sectors (Table 7). Their production encounters challenge due to the inherent dissimilarities between the inorganic and hydrophilic characteristics of the nanoparticles and the hydrophobic nature of polymer matrices. Nonetheless, antimicrobial nanocomposites derived from titania have garnered substantial interest in recent times [215]. A research endeavor delved into the electrochemical fabrication of silver-titania nanocomposites, striving to augment their photocatalytic characteristics while simultaneously amplifying their antifungal and antibacterial activities [216]. Another study focused on the development of paraffin and silver-coated titania nanoparticles (TiO2/AgNPs) embedded in a polyethylene nanocomposite for food packaging purposes. Nanocomposite films were fabricated by melt-blending 3% and 5% of TiO2/Ag NPs into low-density polyethylene. The findings revealed that the addition of 5% TiO2/Ag NPs resulted in a substantial decrease in bacterial growth [217]. Therefore, the incorporation of TiO2 nanoparticles, whether used independently or integrated with polymers, results in the suppression of microbial growth, thereby preventing food spoilage and enhancing the shelf-life of food products [218].

Table 7 Summarizing the antimicrobial activity including antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral of synthesized TiO2-NPs

Antifungal activity

Conventional fungicides and pesticides can be hazardous to health, making nanoparticles (NPs) a more desirable option as they exhibit fewer adverse effects and a more favorable therapeutic index, indicating a better safety margin [247]. Recently, TiO2-NPs have revealed fungicidal effects against different human and plant pathogenic fungi such as Fusarium oxysporum [248], Fusarium graminearum [225], the opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans [226], Macrophomina phaseolina [227] (Table 7). Also, the researchers synthesized nanocomposites comprising polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and TiO2-NPs. These nanocomposites were evaluated for their antifungal properties against two fungal strains: Candida albicans (ATCC 14053) and Penicillium chrysogenum (MTCC 5108); the results demonstrated that the PVA-TiO2 nanoparticle biofilms showed enhanced antifungal activity potential comparing to PVA alone. The incorporation of TiO2 nanoparticles into the PVA matrix conferred superior antifungal efficacy to the nanocomposite material [228].

Candidiasis, caused by Candida species, is an opportunistic fungal infection affecting various mouth, skin, and genitourinary tracts [249] and can cause life-threatening bloodstream candidemia. It has a high global annual incidence of approximately 4 × 106 cases with a mortality rate of about 40%, resulting in a substantial economic burden due to treatment costs and prolonged hospitalization [250]. It has been reported that metal and their oxide nanoparticles such as (TiO2-NPs, Ag-NPs, Cu-NPs, ZnO-NPs) exhibited antifungal activity against Candida species through various mechanisms that synergistically contribute to the inhibition and eradication of these fungal pathogens. Firstly, those nanoparticles release ions that disrupt crucial cellular processes within the fungal cells [229]. Additionally, they induce oxidative and nitrosative stress by generating reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, causing deleterious effects on cellular biomolecules such as lipids, and nucleic acids [39]. Furthermore, these nanoparticles can directly interact with and compromise the structural integrity of the fungal cell membrane and cell wall, compromising their barrier functions and potentially causing leakage of cellular contents [251]. Remarkably, certain nanoparticles can inhibit the activity of essential enzymes involved in various metabolic processes, hampering the growth and survival of fungal cells (Fig. 5). Moreover, they can modulate the expression of specific genes involved in stress response, cell wall biosynthesis, and virulence factors, effectively regulating the fungal cell’s ability to thrive [252]. Also, they can deplete ATP levels, depriving the cells of their primary energy currency and impairing cellular functions [253]. Lastly, they can interact with and damage DNA, leading to genetic alterations and impaired replication [254]. They also disrupt protein structure and function and interfere with mitochondrial processes, further contributing to cellular dysfunction and growth inhibition (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Suggested antifungal mechanisms produced by TiO2-NPs

Laboratory and field studies on heritage buildings have also demonstrated the efficacy of TiO2 as an effective biocidal agent against lichens and phototrophic microbes, as well as a preventive material against the biodeterioration of buildings [255]. Furthermore, the application of TiO2-NPs has been proposed as a protective measure for culturally significant buildings to mitigate the biodeterioration of mortars caused by microbial growth [256]. For example, in one study, researchers evaluated the effects of TiO2-NPs against the fungal mold Aspergillus niger on the surface of Paulownia wood. The results showed that the treatment with TiO2-NPs effectively suppressed the growth of the fungal mold [230]. In another study, the antifungal effects of TiO2-NPs were assessed against wood-decaying fungal species, including brown rot (Mucor circinelloides) and white rot (Hypocrea lixii) fungi [231]. This suggests that TiO2-NPs possess remarkable antifungal properties and can be employed as an effective protective measure against fungal growth and deterioration in various wood-based applications.

However, it is noteworthy that the antifungal activity exhibited by TiO2-NPs appears to be relatively weaker compared to their antibacterial action. This discrepancy can be attributed to the fundamental differences in the structural composition of the cellular envelopes between fungi and bacteria. Fungal cells possess a more robust and complex cell wall structure, which may render them less susceptible to the antifungal mechanisms of TiO2-NPs compared to bacterial cells with their relatively simpler cell envelope architecture [257]. Table 7 summarizing examples for antifungal activity of biogenic TiO2-NPs against various pathogenic fungi.

Antiviral activity

Nanoparticles like Ag, TiO2, and carbon nanotubes possess antiviral properties. These properties are employed to showcase the antiviral mechanisms, which include inhibiting the virus from binding to cells and facilitating the breakdown of the viral capsid [258]. Several factors influence the antiviral capabilities of NPs, including their behavior in air and water environments when studied in vitro.

Notably, TiO2-NPs have exhibited superior antiviral activities against the Newcastle disease virus (NDV) when assessed at doses ranging from 6.25 to 100 µg/ml (Table 7). The mechanism behind this antiviral activity involves the potential of TiO2-NPs to destroy the lipids present in the viral envelope through the generation of ROS, a process known as G-sol. The glycoprotein spikes on the viral surface, which are known to be harmful in facilitating infections, are restricted by an adjunct mechanism, preventing the virus from binding and infecting cells. Consequently, TiO2-NPs represent a promising platform for the treatment of Newcastle disease virus infections [237]. Also, TiO2 nanostructures were utilized to treat faba bean crops infected with the broad bean stain virus (BBSV). The faba bean plants treated with these NPs demonstrated a significant reduction in the severity of the viral disease compared to untreated plants. This superior antiviral effect was observed within two weeks after the plants were infected with the broad bean stain virus [259].

Further studies have highlighted the antiviral potential of TiO2 nanoconjugates and nanoparticles against various influenza viruses. In one investigation, TiO2-NPs displayed antiviral capabilities against the H3N2 influenza virus strain, with the proposed mechanism involving direct interaction between the nanoconjugates and the virus [238]. Additionally, TiO2-NPs have shown antiviral efficacy against the H9N2, the avian influenza virus. Notably, the replication of two other influenza strains, H5N1 and H1N1, was effectively inhibited by the application of DNA-tagged titanium nitride nanoparticles (TiNPs) [211]. The H1N1 influenza virus, with its high frequency of genetic polymorphism [260, 261] that caused the 2009 pandemic, also posed an increased risk of subsequently developing type 1 diabetes in children infected by it [249]. An interesting study has documented the potent antiviral capability of a TiO2-modified hydroxyapatite composite (HA/TiO2) against the H1N1 Influenza A Virus when exposed to UV light irradiation. Notably, these composites exhibit potential for antimicrobial filtration applications, rendering them suitable for use in face masks to combat such highly mutable influenza strains [239]. Also, a novel nanocomposite comprising TiO2-NPs and polylysine (PL)-containing oligonucleotides, termed TiO2PL–DNA. This nanocomposite exhibits antiviral properties against various subtypes of the influenza A virus, including H1N1, H5N1, and H3N2 [240].

Investigations have demonstrated the remarkable disinfection capability of titanium dioxide nanotubes (TiO2-NTs) against SARS-CoV-2. These nanostructures exhibited potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity at extremely low concentrations in vitro, coupled with negligible cytotoxicity and an insignificant selectivity index (CC50/IC50 ≤ 1). Moreover, they displayed excellent antiviral efficacy at very low concentrations (IC50 = 568.6 ng/mL). Consequently, it was concluded that these TiO2 nanostructures are well-suited for use as coatings, serving as potent disinfectants to combat SARS-CoV-2 [241]. While in another study, researchers developed an electrochemical sensor based on TiO2- NTs for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2. The surface engineering of these TiO2 nanostructures has been proposed as a strategy to tailor their potential functionality, enabling real-world applications in combating the SARS-CoV-2 virus [242]. Interestingly, a study explored the potential of TiO2 coatings in inactivating SARS-CoV-2 through time-dependent, TiO2-mediated photocatalytic reactions. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed microstructural changes in the SARS-CoV-2 virus upon interaction with the coating. The antiviral activity, assessed in aerosol and liquid forms, exhibited up to 99.9% effectiveness after 20 min of exposure. The mechanistic effects on the SARS-CoV-2 virion included decreased virion count, increased virion size, and reduced particle surface spike structure. Further analyses using western blotting and RT-qPCR investigated the photocatalytic damaging of viral proteins and genomes, respectively. The study concluded that TiO2-induced photocatalytic reactions hold promise for disinfecting SARS-CoV-2 and other emerging infectious agents in human habitats [262].

Under UV light exposure, the TiO2 surface facilitates the decomposition of ambient oxygen and water into ROS, which act as highly oxidizing or reducing agents, leading to the decomposition of organic and microbial matter. Furthermore, modified TiO2 has demonstrated remarkable utility in visible light activity, enabling indoor or outdoor disinfection applications. This photocatalytic disinfection effect has also shown promising potential as an antiviral photocatalyst for controlling various viruses [211]. ROS, such as OH, O2•-, and H2O2, are produced at the surface of TiO2 due to UV activation (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Antiviral mechanisms of TiO2-NPs based on secretion of ROS

These highly reactive species possess the capability to degrade the capsid proteins of non-enveloped viruses as well as the envelope proteins and phospholipids of enveloped viruses. The degradation of these crucial viral components leads to the leakage of genetic material, resulting in the subsequent degradation of nucleic acids. Consequently, this process culminates in the eventual inactivation of the viral particles, rendering them non-infectious and incapable of replication or causing further infections [263].

Anticancer activity

Nanotechnology has gained prominence in cancer treatment and diagnosis due to the severe side effects associated with traditional chemotherapeutic agents, which exhibit cytotoxicity on healthy cells. The application of nanotechnology offers a more targeted and precise approach, minimizing harm to normal cells while effectively combating cancer [264]. Nanotechnology research in cancer therapy focuses on developing nanostructures capable of delivering and releasing drugs in a targeted manner. Pursuing targeted drug delivery and controlled drug release represents the primary approach to augmenting therapeutic efficacy while mitigating adverse effects.

TiO2 nanostructures, renowned for their high biocompatibility, tunable drug release capabilities, and minimal toxicity, are widely acknowledged as promising candidates for enabling targeted delivery and controlled release of conventional chemotherapeutic agents, consequently enhancing their clinical therapeutic impact [265]. Furthermore, TiO2-NPs have demonstrated their efficacy as drug carriers, facilitating targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics like doxorubicin, cisplatin, and temozolomide [266]. The subsequent sections provide a comprehensive review of significant research endeavors that have explored the utilization of TiO2 nanostructures in targeted drug delivery mechanisms and diverse controlled release systems, shedding light on their potential in cancer treatment.

Target drug delivery

The primary objective of drug delivery systems is to enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse effects through appropriate drug encapsulation. These systems have been designed with varying structures, such as spherical, capsular, and porous configurations, to achieve specific drug release profiles [267]. In this context, the drug can be situated on the surface of TiO2-NPs, potentially leading to a controlled and sustained release pattern. TiO2-NPs are functionalized with specific molecules that possess targeting capabilities toward desired cells, allowing them to localize within tissue-specific cells and thereby enhancing their efficiency. These titanium nanoparticles have been employed as nanocarriers for the delivery of various drugs, including sodium phenytoin, valproic acid, temozolomide, and daunorubicin [268]. Initially, the drug release exhibited a burst pattern, followed by a controlled release over an extended period. Consequently, TiO2-NPs demonstrated the ability to deliver drugs with enhanced efficacy, optimized dosing, and controlled and sustained release profiles while simultaneously reducing toxicity levels.

The surface modification of nanocarriers plays a crucial role in enhancing the specificity of drug delivery [269]. A research study explored this concept by modifying TiO2-NPs with polyethylene glycol (PEG), followed by the attachment of folic acid (FA) and the standard anticancer drug Paclitaxel (PAC). These anticancer properties were investigated in vivo using a diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced hepatocellular cancer animal model. The study’s findings revealed that the surface-modified Paclitaxel (PAC) attached to TiO2-NPs exhibited superior anticancer activity compared to PAC alone. Significantly, the surface modification of TiO2 with FA in the TiO2-PEG-FA-PAC nanocomposite facilitated targeted delivery to liver cancer cells overexpressing FA receptors. This targeted approach resulted in increased accumulation of PAC-NPs at the cancer site, thereby reducing the drug’s toxicity. Moreover, the TiO2-PEG-FA-PAC nanocomposite demonstrated a reduction in cell viability correlated with concentration. when tested on HepG2 liver cancer cells, further underscoring its potent anticancer effects [270].

Another study reported the enhanced anticancer activity of FA-TiO2-NPs against MG63 osteosarcoma cells. Compared to unconjugated nanoparticles, the FA-TiO2-NPs exhibited a two-fold lower IC50 value, indicating improved cytotoxicity and efficacy in inhibiting cancer cell growth. The study also explored the apoptosis-inducing effects of FA-TiO2-NPs on osteosarcoma cells. Treated cells displayed hallmark apoptotic features: condensed chromatin, surface membrane vesiculation, and cell volume reduction [271].

Remarkably, Annexin V/PI apoptosis assay unveiled a significantly higher percentage (38%) of cells undergoing early and late apoptosis upon FA-TiO2-NP exposure compared to only 16% with unmodified TiO2-NPs. Moreover, cell cycle analysis revealed an augmented sub-G1 cell cycle in FA-TiO2-NP-treated cells, signifying escalated reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and heightened apoptosis induction. A parallel study demonstrated that the delivery of doxorubicin via TiO2 nanocomposites facilitated enhanced intracellular drug retention and cellular internalization in multidrug-resistant MCF-7/ADR breast cancer cells, effectively circumventing the P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux mechanism responsible for drug resistance [272]. Researchers in another study developed a pH-responsive drug delivery system by modifying TiO2-NPs with hyaluronic acid (HA) and loading them with the chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin for ovarian cancer treatment. This nanoformulation facilitated enhanced cisplatin accumulation within A2780 ovarian cancer cells via endocytosis, exhibiting significant anticancer effects [273].

Controlled drug release in cancer therapy

In an effort to enhance therapeutic efficacy and mitigate the undesirable side effects of the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin. Doxorubicin was encapsulated within TiO2-NPs, forming DOX-TiO2-NPs. Subsequent evaluation of the anticancer potential of DOX-TiO2-NPs revealed an increased cytotoxic activity against the SMMC-7721 hepatocarcinoma cell line, as demonstrated by the MTT assay [274]. The ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 protein was increased upon DOX-TiO2-NP treatment which indicates the endocytosis uptake of doxorubicin, leading to caspase-apoptotic processes [275]. It is worth highlighting that TiO2-NPs displayed minimal cytotoxicity when used independently at a concentration of 10 µg·mL− 1, with cell viability of 95%, indicating their potential for safe biomedical applications [274].

Stimuli-controlled drug release

Stimuli-responsive systems are designed to release drugs in response to specific signals. These signals can be classified into two categories: internal and external stimuli. Among the benefits of this system are reducing the side effects of used treatment drugs and increasing the drug’s biocompatibility. They facilitate controlled and tissue-specific drug release, contributing to improved therapeutic outcomes [276]. light emerges as an intriguing external trigger for enabling the controlled and timed release of chemotherapeutic agents from delivery systems, owing to its capacity for precise spatial and temporal targeting [277]. In this context, TiO2 nanostructures have garnered substantial interest as photoactive drug carriers. In addition to their photoactive nature, TiO2-NPs are preferred as drug carriers due to their characterized high surface area, durability, and accessibility.

In a study, a mesoporous TiO2 shell as a core-shell structure for near-infrared light-triggered drug delivery. Doxorubicin was loaded into the porous TiO2 shell, and hyaluronic acid (HA) capping was performed. The authors reported that the cell viability was decreased at drug release at low concentrations, indicating its promise for cancer therapy [278]. Also, colloidal TiO2-NPs were utilized as carriers for light-controlled delivery of a ruthenium complex drug to melanoma cancer cells. This system exhibited a faster drug release profile upon UV light exposure compared to visible light illumination. Furthermore, cell death increased when exposed to UV light as opposed to red light. The authors proposed that both the TiO2-NPs and the ruthenium complex could act as photosensitizers, generating reactive oxygen species and inducing cell death [279]. In another study, DOX was loaded onto TiO2-NPs, which were coated with polymeric phenylboronic acid (PBA) through a boronic ester bond. These nanoparticles exhibited high tumor-targeting ability due to the specific interaction between PBA and sialylated epitopes on tumor cells. Additionally, ultrasound irradiation could generate ROS, leading to the release of DOX from the nanoparticles via cleavage of the boronic ester bond [280].

Studies show that increased oxidative stress from elevated tumor ROS levels can be more damaging to cancer cells. ROS generation in the tumor environment triggers desirable apoptotic cell death. Therefore, selectively exposing cancer cells to high ROS levels could serve as a novel target for killing cancer cells without deleterious effects on normal ones [281].

Photodynamic therapy of cancer

Cancer cells are subjected to laser light to produce a photosensitive agent at a specific wavelength called photodynamic therapy (PDT). Unlike other treatments such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, PDT is considered a secondary and highly promising non-invasive modality for cancer therapy [282]. It offers an encouraging approach as a supplementary treatment option for cancer patients [283]. The inorganic nature of TiO2 endows it with the capability to produce ROS when exposed to UV light in aqueous environments (Fig. 7). This ROS generation, which subsequently triggers cell death, positions TiO2 as a promising candidate for PDT, a therapeutic approach utilized in the treatment of diverse diseases [284]. The versatility of TiO2-NPs, their nanocomposites, and hybrid biomolecular forms has been extensively explored, revealing their potential as photosensitizing agents for cancer treatment and combating antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections [285]. When TiO2-NPs are exposed to UV light with a wavelength below 385 nm, photoexcited electrons and holes are generated. Subsequently, these photoexcited electrons and holes can react with OH or H2O, forming oxidative radicals capable of destroying microorganisms and tumor cells (Fig. 7).

The production of ROS by TiO2-NPs has been reported to function as effector signaling mediators in the p53-dependent apoptotic pathway. Upregulated expression of cytochrome c, cleaved caspase-3, and PARP, as observed through western blot analysis, further indicated the induction of apoptosis via caspase activation (Fig. 7), highlighting the therapeutic promise of surface-engineered TiO2-NPs. The generated ROS can damage the mitochondrial membrane and its functionality, subsequently initiating the mitochondrial release of cytochrome c into the cellular matrix, thereby triggering the intrinsic apoptotic cascade [286].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptotic pathways triggered by TiO2-NPs

Theragnostic

The convergence of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches has given rise to a new field known as theragnostic. These strategies enable researchers and clinicians to precisely modulate molecular signaling cascades at the molecular level, which is particularly relevant in the context of PDT [287]. In this regard, nanocomposites comprising zinc(II) phthalocyanine (MCZnPc) and MCZnPc anchored onto TiO2-NPs labeled with radioactive iodine (125I) were synthesized to evaluate their potential for anticancer applications. The researchers evaluated the efficacy of MCZnPc and MCZnPc-TiO2 nanocomposites against HeLa (human cervical cancer) and EMT6 (mouse mammary cancer) cell lines. After a 3-hour incubation period in the dark, the cells were exposed to light at a wavelength of 684 nm. The labeled nanocomposites exhibited enhanced cellular uptake, and the study demonstrated the theragnostic potential of TiO2-NPs for cancer treatment [266]. In a recent study, the incorporation of samarium as a dopant into TiO2-NPs was shown to enhance the radiosensitivity and cellular toxicity of cancer cells. The doped nanoparticles exhibited increased X-ray absorption, leading to the generation of higher ROS upon irradiation compared to undoped TiO2-NPs [288]. TiO2-based platforms have been utilized for the detection of small biomolecules, cancer cells, and pathogens in blood samples through various techniques such as label-free microfluidic immunosensors, photoelectrochemical biosensors, field-effect transistors, and amperometric methods [289].

Additionally, Nanoconjugates composed of TiO2, polyethyleneimine (PEI), and folic acid (FA) have been developed to construct a controlled drug delivery system regulated by near-infrared (NIR) laser irradiation [290]. The induced and sustained delivery of TiO2 nanoparticles facilitated by X-ray exposure can generate electron-vacancy pairs, leading to the structural degradation of organic linkers within the nanoconjugates [291].

Biosensors

Nanosensors are minute yet highly perceptive devices, with at least one of their sensing dimensions measuring around 100 nm or less. These sophisticated instruments play a crucial role in detecting and evaluating intricate physical and chemical transformations. Moreover, they enable the observation of biochemical and biomolecular alterations within cellular environments, as well as the measurement of hazardous environmental contaminants [292] and optimizing electrochemical biosensors for the precise detection and quantification of toxic chemicals in food products to boost food safety protocols [293]. Biosensors derived from nanomaterials possess remarkable capabilities, enabling highly sensitive and rapid detection of biological entities [294]. The recent fascination with innovative hybrid systems combining biomolecules and TiO2 nanostructures has resulted in substantial achievements in manufacturing bio-nano hybrid devices, such as biomolecule-sensitized solar cells (BSSCs) and photoelectrochemical cells (PECs) [295].

In addition, the biosensors field was advanced through the integration of TiO2-NPs and biomolecules to form thin films that monitor patients’ responses to medication or surgical treatment [296]. However, for a biosensor to be commercially viable, it must meet specific criteria: cost-effectiveness, user-friendliness, sensitivity and accuracy, rapid response times, and the ability to be manufactured efficiently with high selectivity rates [297].

TiO2 nanostructures have been utilized to fabricate a diverse range of sensing devices, encompassing humidity, oxygen, and hydrogen sensors. These nanoscale semiconductors have proven their efficacy as exceptional electrode materials within biosensors, owing to their distinctive properties. Such properties include a porous architecture, providing a vast specific surface area, coupled with outstanding biocompatibility [298]. TiO2 possesses the capability to function as an immobilizing matrix, engaging in reactions with the amine and carboxyl groups of enzymes while concurrently preserving their biocatalytic activity [299].

Recently, nanocomposites, including TiO2-NPs, are used in biosensors. For instance, nanocomposites containing graphene oxide/TiO2-nanowires/chitosan were used to monitor the sequences of specific genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. The incorporation of TiO2 nanowires in the nanocomposite significantly increased the interfacial area, thereby enhancing its sensing capabilities [300]. TiO2-based biosensing of target analytes typically employs either electrochemical techniques (such as amperometric and potentiometric processes) or photoelectrochemical (PEC) methods. This alteration manifests as a detectable current signal in the case of amperometric detection or a detectable potential or charge accumulation for potentiometric detection [301]. PEC biosensors, which leverage the photoelectric effect, have emerged as a promising class of electrochemistry-based biosensing devices. These innovative sensors combine the benefits of both optical and electrochemical detection techniques, making them highly attractive for various applications [302].

Typically, a titanium dioxide-based PEC biosensing platform consists of three main components (Fig. 8). Firstly, a nanostructured TiO2 layer is fabricated on a conductive surface, acting as the working electrode (WE). This facilitates the generation and movement of electrons and holes upon exposure to light. Secondly, a catalytic counter electrode (CE) coated with an electron transfer material is present. Finally, an electrolyte is placed between the two electrodes, facilitating the shuttling of holes to the counter electrode [296]. In PEC biosensors, the detection principle relies on photon-to-electricity conversion. The process involves photon absorption by the semiconductor, generating electron-hole pairs that separate and transfer to the working electrode and electrolyte, respectively. The presence of the target analyte modulates the photocurrent generated, which correlates directly with the analyte’s concentration in the sample, enabling quantitative biosensing [302]. In TiO2-based photoelectrochemical biosensors, the transducer material can take one of three forms: (a) consisting solely of TiO2, (b) a hybrid combination of TiO2 and inorganic semiconductors, or (c) a composite material where TiO2 is combined with other substances.

Fig. 8
figure 8

TiO2-based photoelectrochemical (PEC) biosensing platform

Diverse biomolecules like enzymes and DNA have served as bio-recognition elements. When DNA is coupled with TiO2, the presence of target DNA results in the formation or cleavage of double-stranded DNA, leading to a direct or indirect change in the light-harvesting performance of the working electrode. Consequently, this alteration impacts charge separation and the generated photocurrent [303]. Quantum dots with narrow band gaps can sensitize TiO2-NPs and achieve energy band modulation. Cadmium sulfide nanoparticles (CdS-NPs), possessing a narrow band gap of 2.4 eV and a broad excitation spectrum, are well-suited as sensitizing materials. The excitation of CdS -NPs leads to charge separation, facilitating the transfer of conduction band (CB) electrons to the conduction band of TiO2. A recent hybrid material combining CdS QDs and TiO2-NTs has found application in the sensitive detection of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a crucial biomarker for prostate cancer [304]. In this application, the CdS QDs were loaded onto the TiO2-NTs, which acted as transducers. The sensitization of TiO2 with CdS broadens the excitation wavelength range and enhances the photoelectric performance of the TiO2 electrodes. Additionally, the coupling between CdS and TiO2 reduces the recombination of photo-generated electrons and holes, collectively leading to higher conversion efficiency [305]. When PSA is present, an immune-sandwich assembly facilitates the attachment of an immune-gold-labeled alkaline phosphatase (ALP) to the CdS QDs/TiO2 NTs electrode. ALP can catalyze the hydrolysis of ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (AAP) in situ, thereby generating ascorbic acid (AA) for efficient electron donation. The results indicate that an increase in PSA concentration leads to an improved photocurrent response.

PEC biosensors can be combined with alternative detection techniques, enabling the development of biosensors tailored to specific properties and behaviors. In a study, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) utilizing TiO2 nanoparticulate films as the photoanode were integrated with a colorimetric DNA detection approach to sense a particular DNA sequence from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, resulting in a disposable biosensing device [306]. In another study, a nanocomposite consisting of g-C3N4 and TiO2 nanosheets was employed to fabricate a photoelectrochemical biosensor capable of detecting glucose with an impressive detection limit of merely 0.01 mM. The two-dimensional TiO2 nanosheets, possessing a high specific surface area, demonstrated promising potential for accommodating a substantial glucose oxidase loading. Furthermore, to enable visible light excitation of the photoelectrochemical biosensor and avoid potential deactivation by UV radiation, g-C3N4 was incorporated to minimize the nanocomposite’s bandgap [307].

Biomedical imaging

There is a wide range of imaging techniques that can be utilized for scientific research and biomedical applications. These include spectroscopy methods like infrared (IR) spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radio-imaging using specific nuclides, computed tomography (CT) scanning, as well as more advanced scanning techniques such as laser ablation, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) [308]. Enhancements in diagnostic techniques lead to preliminary treatment and improved recovery prospects for patients. Among nanoparticles, titanium dioxide nanoparticles TiO2-NPs are extensively researched and employed in diagnostic methods like MRI and CT scans, serving as contrast agents. Notably, TiO2-NPs become activated upon irradiation, enabling them to act concurrently as diagnostic tools and therapeutic agents.

A research study examined the image contrast capabilities of TiO2-NPs using magnetic MRI and CT scanners. A clear distinction in imaging was detected between the control samples and those containing TiO2-NPs on T2-weighted MRI images. This finding suggests that TiO2-NPs could potentially serve as a novel theragnostic agent, offering both radio-sensitizing properties for therapeutic applications and radiological diagnostic functionality due to chemical modifications on their surface [309]. According to the findings, in-depth investigations were carried out on in-situ tagging methodologies for fluorescence microscopy to mark the TiO2-NPs internalized by cells. The initial technique involved utilizing fluorescent biotin and fluorescent streptavidin to tag the nanoparticles before and after cellular uptake. Conversely, in the second approach, copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition was employed for labeling and identification of azide-conjugated TiO2-NPs. Moreover, synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM) was utilized to detect TiO2-NPs. The results showcasing TiO2-NPs by XFM exhibited remarkable alignment with the location of optical fluorescence as detected by confocal microscopy [310].

TiO2-NPs can be readily synthesized and modified, such as by incorporating europium(III) ions. Additionally, hollow TiO2 nanoshells serve as viable two-photon nanoprobes. When coated with polyethyleneimine, these nanoparticles demonstrate an affinity for binding to HeLa cervical cancer cells, enabling their detection [311]. In another research, a nanostructure comprising a silver core surrounded by a silica shell and an outer mesoporous titania coating (Ag@SiO2@mTiO2) was developed. The metallic silver core served to enhance fluorescence signals [312].

Agriculture applications

Contemporary advanced technologies, including aquatic farming, solar-powered greenhouses, genetic engineering, multi-layer crop production, and anti-mold chemicals, have conferred substantial benefits to the agricultural sector by enabling maximum yield production and the cultivation of off-season crops. However, these technologies have also contributed to significant health and environmental concerns due to the improper utilization of fertilizers and pesticides [313]. Nanotechnology is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary domain focused on developing innovative technological tools to maximize crop yields and enhance plant protection.

The underlying strategy involves boosting plants’ ability to absorb essential nutrients more efficiently. Among various nanomaterials, extensive research efforts have been concentrated on exploring the agricultural applications of TiO2-based nanomaterials due to their distinctive structural properties, chemical stability, hydrophilic nature, and environmental compatibility [314]. The subsequent section highlights the applications of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers derived from TiO2-NPs.

TiO2-NPs as nanopesticides

Maintaining crop health by preventing diseases and pest infestations is a persistent challenge that drives the creation of novel solutions and agents. Chemical pesticides are employed to manage or eliminate microorganisms, unwanted plants, insects, and fungi. Nevertheless, excessive pesticide usage can lead to severe health implications. Nanoparticles or nanoformulations of pesticides demonstrate greater efficacy compared to conventional pesticides (Fig. 9). This increased effectiveness could be attributed to improved absorption of the active ingredients and higher bioavailability facilitated by NPs, consequently resulting in more efficient elimination of infectious agents [315].

Fig. 9
figure 9

The advantages of utilizing TiO2-NPs as nanopesticides for enhancing and improving agricultural yield

TiO₂-NPs were employed to combat Spodoptera littoralis, a polyphagous pest that infests various crops like cotton and vegetables such as tomatoes. An experiment tested six TiO₂-NP concentrations (31.25–1000 ppm) by feeding larvae leaves treated with these nanoparticles. Two weeks after application, mortality was assessed. The findings unequivocally demonstrated the toxic effects of TiO₂-NPs against S. littoralis larvae at all the concentrations tested [316]. In another study, TiO₂-NPs were tested individually and in combination with ZnO-NPs to evaluate their insecticidal efficacy against Bactericera cockerelli nymphs through laboratory and greenhouse studies on tomato plants. While leaf immersion bioassays were conducted in the laboratory, direct plant spraying was employed in the greenhouse. Results showed that TiO₂- NPs alone (100 ppm) and combined with ZnO -NPs (250 ppm) caused 99% and 100% mortality, respectively, after 96 h of treatment in the laboratory. However, in the greenhouse experiment, TiO₂- NPs (500 ppm) and TiO₂ + ZnO NPs (250 ppm) resulted in only 32% and 23% mortality, respectively [317]. Also, a different study explored the insecticidal potential of TiO₂-NPs prepared via a green synthesis method using the aqueous leaf extract of Pouteria campechiana. The findings revealed that at a concentration of 900 µg/ml, the larvae and pupa of Aedes aegypti were dead [318].

TiO2-NPs loaded with fluorine and nitrogen were used to inhibit the Fusarium oxysporum growth in tomatoes under visible light conditions by destroying of fungal cell wall. The synergistic effects of TiO₂-NPs and the attached N & F resulted in a stronger toxic impact on the fungal strain, ultimately leading to its eradication. The generation of ROS under visible light illumination enabled the disinfection of the fungus. Consequently, these TiO₂-NPs could be utilized for visible light-induced bacterial and fungal disinfection [248]. In another investigation, the antibacterial capabilities of TiO₂-NPs and TiO₂-NPs doped with silver (Ag) and zinc (Zn) showed high antibacterial activity (in-vitro and greenhouse experiment) against Xanthomonas perforans that causing tomatoes spot disease at a concentration of 500–800 ppm under visible light conditions. This enhanced activity was attributed to the combinatorial effects of TiO₂ and the Ag and Zn dopants [319]. Table 8 summarizes the activity of TiO2-NPs in agricultural sectors as nanopesticides.

Table 8 Examples of TiO2-NPs used in the agricultural sector to control the infection with different pests, insects, and microbes

TiO2-NPs as nanofertilizers

The incorporation of fertilizers can boost agricultural productivity. However, to address issues such as environmental pollution and inefficient nutrient utilization, nano fertilizers emerge as a preferable option, potentially serving as a more effective and efficient alternative to conventional fertilizers. Additionally, nano fertilizers contribute to enhancing soil quality by mitigating the detrimental effects associated with the excessive application of conventional fertilizers [326]. TiO2-NPs can be utilized in the context of nanofertilizers via diverse approaches, such as foliar administration, seed pretreatment involving immersion, and soil hydroponic methods where TiO2-NPs are incorporated into the irrigation solution or combined with soil substrates [327]. Foliar spraying is a prevalent method for facilitating rapid absorption of TiO2-NPs through stomatal uptake and cuticle layer penetration. Their transport through cell walls and distribution within the plant vascular system is facilitated by their size and surface traits. Conversely, soil applications are frequently chosen due to its prolonged nutrient release capability. TiO2-NPs are internalized by root hairs across the root epidermis, moving symplastically via plasmodesmata between cells, and subsequently transported upwards through stem vascular tissue to the leaves (Fig. 10).contributing to elevated chlorophyll levels, augmented photosynthetic efficiency, and consequently enhanced plant biomass and yield (Fig. 11).

The choice of application technique hinges on the specific crop, its development phase, and intended objectives. Foliar spraying is prevalent for its direct delivery of nanoparticles to photosynthetic tissues, while soil application is favored for prolonged nutrient accessibility.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Foliar spray and soil irrigation routes of TiO2-NPs as nanofertilizers

The influence of TiO₂-NPs, a nano fertilizer, was studied on spinach seedlings during their growth and development stages. The treatment with TiO₂-NPs resulted in improved seed vigor and germination rates. Furthermore, at a 2.5% concentration of nanoTiO2, enhancements were observed in plant dry weight, Rubisco activity, chlorophyll formation, and phytosynthetic rate during the growth phase [328].

Mahmoodzadeh and coauthors investigate the effects of TiO2-NPs on the seedling vigor of canola plants [329]. The authors reported that the seedling and radical growth of canola was increased at high TiO2-NPs concentration (2000 mg/L). In a related investigation, the plant growth (vegetative parts, male and female flower appearance) and phytosynthetic pigment content (chlorophyll, anthocyanins, and carotenoids) of Zea mays were affected by spraying of TiO2-NPs at various TiO₂-NPs concentrations. The results showed that the 0.03% TiO₂-NPs concentration had a notable effect on chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids, total chlorophyll, and anthocyanins. Additionally, the pigmentation during the reproductive stage was improved upon TiO₂-NPs spray as compared with control. These activities could be due to the positive impact of TiO₂-NPs on the electron transport chain and photosynthesis processes, thereby boosting pigment production [330].

Fig. 11
figure 11

Advantages of utilizing TiO2-NPs as nanofertilizers to improve plant growth traits

Recently, TiO2-NPs formed by fruit peel extract of Citrus medica were used to improve the Capsicum annuum yield [331]. Also, the foliar spray of TiO2-NPs on sunflowers at a concentration of 2.6 mg/L led to improved physiological traits and nutritional parameters and increased the content of oil [332]. Interestingly, the height of coriander plants, as well as their physiological traits, carotenoid contents, total sugars, amino acids, and phenols, were improved as a result of spraying with TiO2-NPs at 2, 4, and 6 ppm [333]. These studies collectively demonstrate the potential of TiO₂-NPs to enhance various aspects of plant growth and development across varied species, highlighting their promising applications in agriculture (Table 9).

Table 9 Summarizing the activity of TiO2-NPs in agricultural sectors as nanofertilizers

Environmental applications

Natural resources such as water, air, and soil are severely affected worldwide, and their recovery is difficult due to rapid population growth, urbanization, and industrialization. Several reasons lead to water and soil contamination. The main ones are the direct release of raw industrial effluents without treatment into rivers and sewage management, which interferes with the indiscriminate use of pesticides and fertilizers in agriculture parties. Presently, the pollution of our environment is so widespread that it has turned into a critical issue. Water and soil are contaminated with harmful heavy metals, chlorinated compounds, or dyes. At the same time, the atmosphere is filled with noxious nitrogen oxides (NO), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds, and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). Given the high levels of contamination, now is the time to employ advanced technology for monitoring and identifying these pollutants in our water and soil [339].

Nanotechnology has experienced remarkable advancements in the field of environmental protection over the recent years [340]. Among its most promising contributions are the significant applications in water and air remediation. The nano-size, surface area to volume ratio, chemical NPs stability, surface modifications, and shapes are considered the unique features of NPs, making them superior activity for environmental applications either in-situ or ex-situ [341]. Different types of available nanomaterials and nanotools are being utilized to remediate environmental contaminants [342]. Among the various materials, utilizing TiO₂-NPs as a remediating agent is witnessing a steady rise in applications such as water purification, air cleaning, and soil decontamination. The electronic band structure, high quantum efficiency, stability, and chemical inertness for TiO2-NPs enable them to be resilient and adaptable to diverse conditions and uses, especially for contaminant removal [343]. Table 10 summarizes the activity of TiO2-NPs in removing soil and water contaminants.

Table 10 Examples of different TiO2-NPs and their rule in soil and water remediation

Soil remediation

Soil contamination occurs due to the presence of hazardous compounds, particularly heavy metals at toxic levels. The sources of soil pollution include manufacturing activities, mining operations, and landfill sites containing industrial wastes like paint residues, electrical wastes, batteries, and industrial or municipal sewage [356]. Heavy metals pose a significant challenge as soil pollutants because they are non-degradable and persist in the environment once introduced [357]. Numerous research studies have revealed intriguing findings pertaining to the use of TiO₂-NPs for soil remediation through the UV-facilitated degradation of organic contaminants present in the soil [358].

The photodegradation of diphenyl arsenic acid (DPAA), a pollutant resulting from leakage of arsenic weapons with adverse health effects, has been studied using TiO2-NPs. Various operational parameters like NP dosage, radiation time, light intensity, and soil-water ratio were optimized to enhance DPAA removal efficiency up to 82.7%. While TiO₂-NPs don’t completely convert DPAA, they adsorb its inorganic arsenic byproducts, playing a crucial role in mitigating DPAA contamination through photocatalytic oxidation [344]. Another study investigated the photocatalytic degradation of p-nitrophenol, a bio-refractory and toxic organic compound widely used in various industries, from contaminated soil using TiO2-NPs combined with pulsed discharge plasma. The mechanism involved removing p-nitrophenol from the soil and enhancing its degradation by increasing the pulsed discharge voltage. The authors proposed that the pulsed discharge plasma could drive the photocatalysis of TiO2-NPs. The report revealed that this approach could remove up to 88% of p-nitrophenol within just 10 min [345].

Also, a study examined the combined application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and TiO2-NPs for enhancing phytoremediation of cadmium (Cd) contaminated soil using Trifolium repens seedlings. The soil had 28% clay, 37% sand, 35% silt, 0.47% N, 7.1 mg/kg phosphorus, and pH 7.8. Different doses of TiO2-NPs and PGPR were applied separately and in combination to analyze their effects on Cd uptake, plant growth, and chlorophyll content. The combined application promoted plant growth, increased chlorophyll content, reduced the required TiO2-NPs dosage for phytoremediation, and enhanced Cd uptake and T. repens growth in Cd-contaminated soil compared to individual applications. This highlights the potential synergistic effects of PGPR and TiO2-NPs for efficient phytoremediation of heavy metal-polluted soils [346]. The combined application of biochar and TiO2-NPs was explored for phytoremediation of antimony (Sb) contaminated soil using Sorghum bicolor seedlings. The soil had a pH of 7.7, 1.12% N, 8.7 mg/kg phosphorus, 28% clay, 37% sand, and 35% silt. Different concentrations of TiO2 and biochar were applied individually and in combination to assess their effects on plant growth, Sb uptake and accumulation, and physiological responses in Sb-polluted soil. The results showed that the combined biochar and TiO2-NPs treatment positively influenced plant growth and significantly increased Sb accumulation compared to individual applications. The findings demonstrated the potential of this approach for efficient phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils [347].

Water remediation

Clean and fresh water is a vital necessity for daily life and the life cycle of living organisms. Recently, water resources have been highly contaminated with a wide range of pollutants as a result of human activities [359]. Among these contaminants are physical (such as impurities that alter the water’s physical features), chemical (such as heavy metals and organic and inorganic pollutants), and biological pollutants. These pollutants have negative and deleterious impacts on humans, animals, and the ecosystem [360]. Therefore, the treatment of wastewater based on nanoscience has been given more attention. Adsorption and photocatalytic-based nanotechnology are among the approaches for wastewater treatment that have gained a lot of traction due to their eco-friendliness, sustainability, and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, they offer various other advantageous properties that make them particularly suitable for tackling the complex issue of water contamination [361]. In this regard, TiO2-NPs are widely employed in water remediation (Fig. 12) due to their unique physical and chemical features, highly biocompatible, robust oxidation efficiency, and unparalleled photocatalytic properties [10]. This prominence has led to a surge in research focused on harnessing the potential of TiO₂-NPs for wastewater treatment, with numerous studies exploring their efficacy in this domain.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO2-NPs in organic pollutants degradation and their role in water remediation

Conclusion

In summary, this review underscores the pivotal role of TiO2-NPs in nanotechnology. The principal findings point out that TiO2-NPs showcase notable versatility and potential across diverse sectors, including biomedical research, agricultural advancement, and environmental restoration. Their distinctive characteristics, such as high surface area and photoactivation customize them for various medical and ecological applications, including targeted drug delivery, photodynamic therapy, and environmental decontamination. The insights above emphasize the need for continued exploration of bio-based synthetic techniques and detailed bioactivity mechanisms, focusing on enhancing their efficacy and safety in healthcare applications and improving their usage in agronomic practices.

Future perspectives

The future of TiO2-NPs holds immense potential, with numerous exciting avenues awaiting exploration. By addressing current challenges, leveraging cutting-edge technologies, and fostering interdisciplinary collaborations, researchers can unlock the full potential of these remarkable nanoparticles, driving innovation and advancing scientific frontiers across various domains.

Synthesis Advancements: The green and biogenic synthesis routes for TiO2-NPs have gained traction owing to their eco-friendly nature and sustainability. However, there is significant scope for optimization and scaling up these biological synthesis methods to achieve industrial-scale production while maintaining monodispersity and precise control over nanoparticle size, shape, and crystallinity. Integrating cutting-edge techniques, such as machine learning and computational modeling, could accelerate the design and development of novel biogenic synthesis strategies, enabling the tailored production of TiO2-NPs for specific applications.

Surface modifications and hybrid nanostructures: The surface chemistry of TiO2-NPs plays a pivotal role in determining their functionality and performance. Future research endeavors could focus on developing innovative surface modification strategies, including doping, functionalization, and incorporating biomolecules or polymers. These approaches can potentially enhance the nanoparticles’ biocompatibility, stability, and targeted delivery capabilities, expanding their applications in biomedicine, sensing, and catalysis domains.

Moreover, integrating TiO2-NPs with other nanomaterials, such as graphene, carbon nanotubes, or quantum dots, could give rise to hybrid nanostructures with synergistic properties. These hybrid systems may exhibit superior performance in areas like photocatalysis, energy conversion, and optoelectronics, paving the way for developing advanced technologies and devices.

Theragnostic applications: The remarkable photocatalytic and optical properties of TiO2-NPs have enabled their exploration in biomedical applications, including cancer therapy, antimicrobial treatments, and bioimaging. Future research could delve into developing multifunctional TiO2-based nanoplatforms that seamlessly integrate diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities. Such theragnostic systems could facilitate early disease detection, targeted drug delivery, and real-time monitoring of therapeutic responses, ushering in a new era of personalized and precision medicine.

Environmental remediation: The photocatalytic activity of TiO2-NPs has demonstrated promising potential in environmental remediation applications, such as water purification, air cleaning, and soil decontamination. Future efforts could focus on enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency and visible-light absorption of TiO2-NPs through doping, surface modifications, or developing hybrid nanostructures. Additionally, integrating TiO2-NPs into sustainable and scalable technologies, such as membrane filtration systems or photocatalytic reactors, could facilitate widespread adoption in environmental remediation processes.

Interdisciplinary Collaborations: The multifaceted nature of TiO2-NPs necessitates multidisciplinary collaborations among researchers from diverse fields, including chemistry, materials science, biology, medicine, and environmental engineering. Such collaborative efforts foster cross-pollination of ideas, enable the exchange of knowledge and expertise, and accelerate the translation of fundamental research into practical applications.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Malik S, Muhammad K, Waheed Y, Nanotechnology. A revolution in Modern Industry. Molecules. 2023;28:661.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Patra JK, Das G, Fraceto LF, Campos EVR, Rodriguez-Torres M, del Acosta-Torres P. Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects. J Nanobiotechnol. 2018;16:71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Elumalai K, Srinivasan S, Shanmugam A. Review of the efficacy of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems for cancer treatment. Biomed Technol. 2024;5:109–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vollath D, Fischer FD, Holec D. Surface energy of nanoparticles – influence of particle size and structure. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2018;9:2265–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Basavegowda N, Dhanya Kumar G, Tyliszczak B, Wzorek Z, Sobczak-Kupiec A. One-step synthesis of highly-biocompatible spherical gold nanoparticles using Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. (jackfruit) fruit extract and its effect on pathogens. Ann Agric Environ Med AAEM. 2015;22:84–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Muruganandham M, Al-Otibi FO, Alharbi RI, Sivasubramanian K, Raja RK, Velmurugan P et al. Antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, and cytotoxicity activities of the aqueous extract of Syzygium aromaticum-mediated synthesized novel silver nanoparticles. Green Process Synth [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Oct 26];12. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1515/gps-2023-0188/html

  7. Sana SS, Hou T, Li H, Vadde R, Basavegowda N, Chakravorty A, et al. Crude polysaccharide produces silver nanoparticles with inherent antioxidant and antibacterial activity. ChemistrySelect. 2023;8:e202203658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lava MB, Muddapur UM, Basavegowda N, More SS, More VS. Characterization, anticancer, antibacterial, anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory activities of green synthesized silver nanoparticles using Justica wynaadensis leaves extract. Mater Today Proc. 2021;46:5942–7.

  9. Basavegowda N, Mishra K, Lee YR, Kim SH. Antioxidant and anti-tyrosinase activities of Palladium nanoparticles synthesized using Saururus chinensis. J Clust Sci. 2016;27:733–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Akakuru O, Iqbal MZ, Wu A. TiO 2 Nanoparticles: Properties and Applications. 2020. pp. 1–66.

  11. Valden M, Lai X, Goodman DW. Onset of Catalytic Activity of Gold clusters on Titania with the appearance of Nonmetallic properties. Science. 1998;281:1647–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernández-García M, Rodriguez JA. Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Encycl Inorg Bioinorg Chem [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011 [cited 2024 Mar 5]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/9781119951438.eibc0331

  13. Samsonov VM, Sdobnyakov NYu, Bazulev AN. On thermodynamic stability conditions for nanosized particles. Surf Sci. 2003;532–535:526–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pacchioni G, Ferrari AM, Bagus PS. Cluster and band structure ab initio calculations on the adsorption of CO on acid sites of the TiO2(110) surface. Surf Sci. 1996;350:159–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chavali MS, Nikolova MP. Metal oxide nanoparticles and their applications in nanotechnology. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1:607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Joudeh N, Linke D. Nanoparticle classification, physicochemical properties, characterization, and applications: a comprehensive review for biologists. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20:262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Piccinno F, Gottschalk F, Seeger S, Nowack B. Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. J Nanoparticle Res. 2012;14:1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sagadevan S, Imteyaz S, Murugan B, Lett JA, Sridewi N, Weldegebrieal GK, et al. A comprehensive review on green synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and their diverse biomedical applications. Green Process Synth. 2022;11:44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Medhi R, Marquez MD, Lee TR. Visible-light-active Doped Metal Oxide nanoparticles: review of their synthesis, Properties, and applications. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2020;3:6156–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tosoni S, Di Liberto G, Pacchioni G. Structural and electronic properties of TiO2 from first principles calculations. In: Parrino F, Palmisano L, editors. Titan Dioxide Tio₂ Its Appl [Internet]. Elsevier; 2021 [cited 2024 Mar 5]. pp. 67–85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128199602000195

  21. Roy J. The synthesis and applications of TiO2 nanoparticles derived from phytochemical sources. J Ind Eng Chem. 2022;106:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eddy DR, Permana MD, Sakti LK, Sheha GAN, Solihudin, Hidayat S, et al. Heterophase Polymorph of TiO2 (Anatase, Rutile, Brookite, TiO2 (B)) for efficient photocatalyst: fabrication and activity. Nanomaterials. 2023;13:704.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chahardoli A, Hosseinzadeh L, Shokoohinia Y, Fattahi A. Production of rutile titanium dioxide nanoparticles by trans-ferulic acid and their biomedical applications. Mater Today Commun. 2022;33:104305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang W, Li Y, Su Y, Mao K, Wang Q. Effect of water composition on TiO2 photocatalytic removal of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) and estrogenic activity from secondary effluent. J Hazard Mater. 2012;215–216:252–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Younis AB, Haddad Y, Kosaristanova L, Smerkova K. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: recent progress in antimicrobial applications. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2023;15:e1860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ropers M-H, Terrisse H, Mercier-Bonin M, Humbert B. Titanium Dioxide as Food Additive. 2017.

  27. Gupta D, Boora A, Thakur A, Gupta TK. Green and sustainable synthesis of nanomaterials: recent advancements and limitations. Environ Res. 2023;231:116316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baig N, Kammakakam I, Falath W. Nanomaterials: a review of synthesis methods, properties, recent progress, and challenges. Mater Adv. 2021;2:1821–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Harish V, Ansari MM, Tewari D, Gaur M, Yadav AB, García-Betancourt M-L, et al. Nanoparticle and nanostructure synthesis and controlled growth methods. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:3226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumari S, Raturi S, Kulshrestha S, Chauhan K, Dhingra S, András K, et al. A comprehensive review on various techniques used for synthesizing nanoparticles. J Mater Res Technol. 2023;27:1739–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen Y, Pépin A. Nanofabrication: conventional and nonconventional methods. Electrophoresis. 2001;22:187–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Acikgoz C, Hempenius MA, Huskens J, Vancso GJ. Polymers in conventional and alternative lithography for the fabrication of nanostructures. Eur Polym J. 2011;47:2033–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. El-Khawaga AM, Zidan A, El-Mageed AIAA. Preparation methods of different nanomaterials for various potential applications: a review. J Mol Struct. 2023;1281:135148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Salem SS, Fouda A. Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and their prospective biotechnological applications: an overview. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2021;199:344–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aigbe UO, Osibote OA. Green synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles, and their various applications. J Hazard Mater Adv. 2024;13:100401.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ghosh S, Ahmad R, Zeyaullah M, Khare SK. Microbial Nano-Factories: Synthesis and Biomedical Applications. Front Chem [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Mar 8];9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fchem.2021.626834

  37. Mustapha T, Misni N, Ithnin NR, Daskum AM, Unyah NZ. A review on plants and microorganisms mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles, role of plants metabolites and applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:674.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tejashwini DM, Harini HV, Nagaswarupa HP, Naik R, Deshmukh VV, Basavaraju N. An in-depth exploration of eco-friendly synthesis methods for metal oxide nanoparticles and their role in photocatalysis for industrial dye degradation. Chem Phys Impact. 2023;7:100355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shelar A, Didwal PN, Patil R. Recent Advances in Antifungal Nanomaterials for Combating Biofilm Infection Caused by Candida albicans. In: Chaughule RS, Lokur AS, editors. Appl Nanotechnol Microbiol [Internet]. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2023 [cited 2024 May 18]. pp. 271–90. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-031-49933-3_10

  40. Amin MA, Ismail MA, Badawy AA, Awad MA, Hamza MF, Awad MF, et al. The potency of fungal-fabricated selenium nanoparticles to improve the growth performance of Helianthus annuus L. and Control of Cutworm Agrotis ipsilon. Catalysts. 2021;11:1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Singh H, Desimone MF, Pandya S, Jasani S, George N, Adnan M, et al. Revisiting the Green synthesis of nanoparticles: uncovering influences of plant extracts as reducing agents for enhanced synthesis efficiency and its Biomedical Applications. Int J Nanomed. 2023;18:4727–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hano C, Abbasi BH. Plant-based green synthesis of nanoparticles: production, characterization and applications. Biomolecules. 2021;12:31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Heppner S, Livney YD. Green leaves as a promising source for sustainable food protein: seeking the productivity-functionality balance. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2023;142:104207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Alnaddaf LM, Almuhammady AK, Salem KFM, Alloosh MT, Saleh MM, Al-Khayri JM. Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles Using Different Plant Extracts and Their Characterizations. In: Al-Khayri JM, Ansari MI, Singh AK, editors. Nanobiotechnology Mitig Abiotic Stress Plants [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021 [cited 2024 May 17]. pp. 165–99. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-73606-4_8

  45. Fouda A, Eid AM, Guibal E, Hamza MF, Hassan SE-D, Alkhalifah DHM, et al. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles by Aqueous Extract of Zingiber officinale: characterization and insight into Antimicrobial, antioxidant, and in Vitro cytotoxic activities. Appl Sci. 2022;12:12879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Patil S, Chandrasekaran R. Biogenic nanoparticles: a comprehensive perspective in synthesis, characterization, application and its challenges. J Genet Eng Biotechnol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Mar 8];18. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7588575/

  47. Sabourian P, Yazdani G, Ashraf SS, Frounchi M, Mashayekhan S, Kiani S, et al. Effect of Physico-Chemical properties of nanoparticles on their intracellular uptake. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:8019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Inam M, Attique I, Zahra M, Khan A, Hahim M, Hano C, et al. Metal oxide nanoparticles and plant secondary metabolism: unraveling the game-changer nano-elicitors. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult PCTOC. 2023;155:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bitwell C, Indra SS, Luke C, Kakoma MK. A review of modern and conventional extraction techniques and their applications for extracting phytochemicals from plants. Sci Afr. 2023;19:e01585.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang Q-W, Lin L-G, Ye W-C. Techniques for extraction and isolation of natural products: a comprehensive review. Chin Med. 2018;13:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Abubakar AR, Haque M. Preparation of Medicinal plants: basic extraction and fractionation procedures for experimental purposes. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020;12:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Sivaranjani V, Philominathan P. Synthesize of Titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Moringa oleifera leaves and evaluation of wound healing activity. Wound Med. 2016;12:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kumar PSM. Biosynthesized and chemically synthesized Titania nanoparticles: comparative analysis of antibacterial activity. J Environ Nanotechnol. 2014;3:73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sundrarajan M, Gowri S. Green synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles by nyctanthes arbor-tristis leaves extract. Chalcogenide Lett. 2011;8.

  55. Marimuthu S, Rahuman AA, Jayaseelan C, Kirthi AV, Santhoshkumar T, Velayutham K, et al. Acaricidal activity of synthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Calotropis gigantea against Rhipicephalus microplus and Haemaphysalis bispinosa. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2013;6:682–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kanayairam V, Rahuman A, Rajakumar G, Thirunavukkarasu S, Marimuthu S, Chidambaram J et al. Evaluation of Catharanthus roseus leaf extract-mediated biosynthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles against Hippobosca maculata and Bovicola ovis. Parasitol Res. 2011;111.

  57. Wang N, Fuh JYH, Dheen ST, Senthil Kumar A. Synthesis methods of functionalized nanoparticles: a review. Bio-Des Manuf. 2021;4:379–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ridolfo R, Tavakoli S, Junnuthula V, Williams DS, Urtti A, van Hest JCM. Exploring the impact of morphology on the properties of Biodegradable nanoparticles and their diffusion in Complex Biological Medium. Biomacromolecules. 2021;22:126–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hussain S, Nazar W, Tajammal A, Nasreen Z, Ahmad T, Asghar A, et al. Green Synthesis of TiO 2 nanoparticle in Morus nigra leaves; characterization and biological potential. Pol J Environ Stud. 2024;33:2707–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Doğan B, Yeşilyurt MK, Yaman H, Korkmaz N, Arslan A. Green synthesis of SiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles using safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) leaves and investigation of their usability as alternative fuel additives for diesel-safflower oil biodiesel blends. Fuel. 2024;367:131498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yunusa H, Omoniyi KI, Abechi SE, Sani SD, Ugwoke AO, Imam N, GREEN, SYNTHESIS OF TITANIUM OXIDE (TIO2) NANOPARTICLES USING Phyllanthus Niruri AND ASSESSMENT OF ITS PHYSIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT. J Chem Soc Niger [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 May 15];49. https://www.journals.chemsociety.org.ng/index.php/jcsn/article/view/965

  62. Omar MHH, Elfarash AEM, El-Aref HM, Al-Hakkani MF. Role of biosynthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticles in antibacterial activity and cefoperazone removal from pharmaceutical wastewater. Process Biochem. 2024;142:162–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hamad TG, Salman TA. Green synthesis of titanium oxide nanoparticles using pomegranate leaf extract: Characterization and antibacterial activity evaluation. AIP Conf Proc. 2024;3097:030008.

  64. Farooqi MA, Farooqi HMU, Bhatti T, Siddiqui GU, Kausar F, Kang CU. Functionalization of niobium nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles with ethanolic extracts of Mentha arvensis. Discov Nano. 2024;19:67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Rana A, Pathak S, Kumar K, Kumari A, Chopra S, Kumar M, et al. Multifaceted properties of TiO 2 nanoparticles synthesized using Mangifera indica and Azadirachta indica plant extracts: antimicrobial, antioxidant, and non-linear optical activity investigation for sustainable agricultural applications. Mater Adv. 2024;5:2767–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sharififard H. A bio-nanocomposite of TiO2 NPs from mangrove (Avicennia marina) leaf and shrimp shell-based chitosan: sono-chemical synthesis, characterization, and its application as an adsorbent for anionic dye removal in a batch and continuous process. Biomass Convers Biorefinery [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 May 15]; https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s13399-024-05494-5

  67. Rajasekar R, Shanmugam R, Anandan J. Biosynthesis of Cissus rotundifolia stem-mediated Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles and their anticariogenic activity against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus sp. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16:S1350.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Rathi VH, Jeice AR. Visible light photocatalytic dye degradation, antimicrobial activities of green synthesized Ag/TiO2 nanoparticles. Chem Phys Impact. 2024;8:100537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Farooqi MA, Bhatti T, Siddiqui GU, Mok YS, Farooqi HMU, Kausar F, et al. Functionalization of niobium nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles by using Mucuna pruriens methanolic extracts. Appl Nanosci. 2024;14:663–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Bhat UH, Uddin M, Chishti AS, Singh S, Singh S, Khan MMA et al. Enhancing growth, vitality, and aromatic richness: unveiling the dual magic of silicon dioxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in Ocimum tenuiflorum L. Front Plant Sci [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 May 15];15. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fpls.2024.1335965/full

  71. Khan A, Raza A, Hashem A, Dolores Avila-Quezada G, Fathi Abd_Allah E, Ahmad F, et al. Green fabrication of titanium dioxide nanoparticles via Syzygium cumini leaves extract: characterizations, photocatalytic activity and nematicidal evaluation. Green Chem Lett Rev. 2024;17:2331063.

  72. Akram W, Mia R, Ullah S, Assiri MA, Fang J. Simultaneous synthesis and application of TiO2 nanoparticles using mulberry leaves for functionalization of organic cotton fabric. J Clean Prod. 2024;440:140939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Hamdi H, Rashwan RS, Abu-zaid AA, Gado E, Zarah RK, Sami R, et al. Efficacy of Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles using Juniperus phoenicea in Controlling Rice Weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) and its effect on the microbial contents and nutritive value of grains. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy. 2024;18:1002–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Shivalingam C, Gurumoorthy K, Murugan R, Ali S, Herbal-Based Green. Synthesis of TB-ZnO-TiO(II) Nanoparticles Composite From Terminalia bellirica: Characterization, Toxicity Assay, Antioxidant Assay, and Antimicrobial Activity. Cureus [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 May 15]; https://www.cureus.com/articles/227559-herbal-based-green-synthesis-of-tb-zno-tioii-nanoparticles-composite-from-terminalia-bellirica-characterization-toxicity-assay-antioxidant-assay-and-antimicrobial-activity

  75. Shafie NFA, Zulkifli NS, Ali RR, Tarmizi ZI, Faizo SM. Green synthesis of Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles using extraction of Psidium Guajava for Smart Packaging Application. J Res Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2024;11:16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Subramanian R, Ponnanikajamideen M, Samuel Rajendran R, Alshehri MA, Alasmari A, Panneerselvam C, et al. TiO2 nanoparticles: green synthesis, characterization, and investigation of antimicrobial properties, and developmental toxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2024;47:90–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ganapathy K, Rastogi V, Lora CP, Suriyaprakash J, Alarfaj AA, Hirad AH, et al. Biogenic synthesis of dopamine/carboxymethyl cellulose/TiO2 nanoparticles using Psidium guajava leaf extract with enhanced antimicrobial and anticancer activities. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2024;47:131–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Bopape DA, Tetana ZN, Mabuba N, Motaung DE, Hintsho-Mbita NC. Biosynthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using Commelina benghanlensis for the photodegradation of methylene blue dye and antibiotics: Effect of plant concentration. Results Chem. 2023;5:100825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Gupta S, Jain P. Eco-friendly synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles by Moringa oleifera leaves, their characterization and impact on spinach seeds (Spinacia oleracea). Mater Today Proc. 2023;89:91–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Upadhyay DD, Goyal AK, Maji S, Dwivedi A, Pandey G. Biosynthesis of ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles using Ipomoea carnea leaf extract and its effect on black carrot (Daucus carota L.) cv. Pusa Asita. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023;202:107908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Thakur N, Thakur N, Kumar K, Kumar A. Tinospora cordifolia mediated eco-friendly synthesis of Cobalt doped TiO2 NPs for degradation of organic methylene blue dye. Mater Today Proc [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 May 15]; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785323003450

  82. Mbenga Y, Adeyemi JO, Mthiyane DMN, Singh M, Onwudiwe DC. Green synthesis, antioxidant and anticancer activities of TiO2 nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Tulbhagia Violacea. Results Chem. 2023;6:101007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Alabdallah NM, Irshad MA, Rizwan M, Nawaz R, Inam A, Mohsin M, et al. Synthesis, characterization and antifungal potential of titanium dioxide nanoparticles against fungal disease (Ustilago tritici) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Environ Res. 2023;228:115852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Xing Y, Fan X, Li X, Xu Q, Tang J, Wu L, et al. Green synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles: structural characterization and photoinduced antifungal activity against P. Steckii. J Food Sci. 2023;88:328–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Azeez L, Aremu HK, Busari HK, Adekale I, Olabode OA, Adewinbi S. Biofabrication of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with Terminalia catappa bark extract: characterization, antioxidant activity and plant modulating ability. Inorg Nano-Met Chem. 2023;0:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Al Masoudi LM, Alqurashi AS, Abu Zaid A, Hamdi H. Characterization and Biological studies of Synthesized Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles from Leaf Extract of Juniperus phoenicea (L.) growing in Taif Region, Saudi Arabia. Processes. 2023;11:272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Badshah I, Mustafa N, Khan R, Mashwani Z-R, Raja NI, Almutairi MH, et al. Biogenic Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles ameliorate the effect of salinity stress in wheat crop. Agronomy. 2023;13:352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Alsharif SM, Salem SS, Abdel-Rahman MA, Fouda A, Eid AM, El-Din Hassan S, et al. Multifunctional properties of spherical silver nanoparticles fabricated by different microbial taxa. Heliyon. 2020;6:e03943.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Ghosh S, Ahmad R, Banerjee K, AlAjmi MF, Rahman S. Mechanistic aspects of microbe-mediated nanoparticle synthesis. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:638068.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Hassan SE-D, Fouda A, Saied E, Farag MMS, Eid AM, Barghoth MG, et al. Rhizopus oryzae-mediated green synthesis of Magnesium Oxide nanoparticles (MgO-NPs): a Promising Tool for Antimicrobial, Mosquitocidal Action, and tanning Effluent Treatment. J Fungi. 2021;7:372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Sandhu A, Goel A. Biosynthesis of nanoparticles by micro-organisms and its applications. J Young Pharm. 2023;15:430–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Abdel-Maksoud G, Abdel-Nasser M, Hassan SE-D, Eid AM, Abdel-Nasser A, Fouda A. Green synthesis of Magnesium Oxide nanoparticles using probiotic strain Lactobacillus Gasseri and their activity against fungal strains isolated from historical manuscripts. Egypt J Chem. 2023;66:179–89.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Fouda A, Abdel-Nasser M, Eid AM, Hassan SE-D, Abdel-Nasser A, Alharbi NK, et al. An Eco-friendly Approach utilizing Green Synthesized Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles for Leather Conservation against a fungal strain, Penicillium Expansum AL1, involved in the Biodeterioration of a historical manuscript. Biology. 2023;12:1025.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Abdel-Maksoud G, Gaballah S, Youssef AM, Eid AM, Sultan MH, Fouda A. Eco-friendly approach for control of fungal deterioration of archaeological skeleton dated back to the Greco-Roman period. J Cult Herit. 2023;59:38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Alharbi MA, Alrehaili AA, Albureikan MOI, Gharib AF, Daghistani H, Bakhuraysah MM, et al. In vitro studies on the pharmacological potential, anti-tumor, antimicrobial, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of marine-derived Bacillus velezensis AG6 exopolysaccharide. RSC Adv. 2023;13:26406–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Alharbi MA, Shahlol AMA, Albureikan MOI, Johani K, Elsehrawy MG, El-Nablaway M et al. Investigating the Multi-Targeted Pharmacological profile of an Exopolysaccharide from Bacillus rugosus SYG20 via In Vitro Evaluation of its Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory, Anti-diabetic, Wound Healing, and Antimicrobial Properties. Arch Med Sci [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 14]; https://www.archivesofmedicalscience.com/Investigating-the-Multi-Targeted-Pharmacological-profile-of-an-Exopolysaccharide,190065,0,2.html

  97. Ghareeb A, Fouda A, Kishk RM, El Kazzaz WM. Unlocking the therapeutic potential of bioactive exopolysaccharide produced by marine actinobacterium Streptomyces vinaceusdrappus AMG31: a novel approach to drug development. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;133861.

  98. Alharbi NK, Azeez ZF, Alhussain HM, Shahlol AMA, Albureikan MOI, Elsehrawy MG et al. Tapping the biosynthetic potential of marine Bacillus licheniformis LHG166, a prolific sulphated exopolysaccharide producer: structural insights, bio-prospecting its antioxidant, antifungal, antibacterial and anti-biofilm potency as a novel anti-infective lead. Front Microbiol [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Apr 12];15. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1385493/full

  99. Aloraini GS, Albureikan MOI, Shahlol AMA, Shamrani T, Daghistani H, El-Nablaway M et al. Biomedical and therapeutic potential of marine-derived Pseudomonas sp. strain AHG22 exopolysaccharide: A novel bioactive microbial metabolite. Rev Adv Mater Sci [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 May 14];63. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1515/rams-2024-0016/html?lang=en

  100. Abdel-Wahab B, Abd El-Kareem H, Alzamami A, Fahmy C, Elesawy B, Mahmoud M, et al. Novel exopolysaccharide from Marine Bacillus subtilis with broad potential Biological activities: insights into Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxicity, and Anti-alzheimer Activity. Metabolites. 2022;12:715.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Selim S, Almuhayawi MS, Alharbi MT, Nagshabandi MK, Alanazi A, Warrad M, et al. In Vitro Assessment of Antistaphylococci, Antitumor, Immunological and Structural characterization of Acidic Bioactive exopolysaccharides from Marine Bacillus cereus isolated from Saudi Arabia. Metabolites. 2022;12:132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Escárcega-González CE, Garza-Cervantes JA, Vázquez-Rodríguez A, Morones-Ramírez JR. Bacterial exopolysaccharides as reducing and/or stabilizing agents during synthesis of metal nanoparticles with Biomedical Applications. Int J Polym Sci. 2018;2018:e7045852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Xu W, Jin W, Lin L, Zhang C, Li Z, Li Y, et al. Green synthesis of xanthan conformation-based silver nanoparticles: antibacterial and catalytic application. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;101:961–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Pooja D, Panyaram S, Kulhari H, Rachamalla SS, Sistla R. Xanthan gum stabilized gold nanoparticles: characterization, biocompatibility, stability and cytotoxicity. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;110:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. AboElmaaty SA, Shati AA, Alfaifi MY, Elbehairi SEI, Sheraba NS, Hassan MG, et al. Biofilm Inhibitory activity of actinomycete-synthesized AgNPs with low cytotoxic effect: experimental and in Silico Study. Microorganisms. 2023;11:102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Gupta A, Singh D, Singh S, Singh V, Kumar A. Role of actinomycetes in bioactive and nanoparticle synthesis. 2019.

  107. Manimaran M, Krishnan K. Actinomycetes mediated biogenic synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: Progress and challenges. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017;64.

  108. De Simeis D, Serra S, Actinomycetes. A never-ending source of Bioactive Compounds—An overview on Antibiotics Production. Antibiotics. 2021;10:483.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Rudayni SSP, Bepari HA, Niazi A, Nayaka SK. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Streptomyces hirsutus strain SNPGA-8 and their characterization, antimicrobial activity, and anticancer activity against human lung carcinoma cell line A549. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022;29:228–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Kosarsoy-Agceli G, Hammamchi H, Kodal S, Cihangir N, Aksu Z. A Novel Approach to synthesize TiO2 nanoparticles: biosynthesis by using Streptomyces sp. HC1. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater. 2020;30.

  111. Priyaragini S, Veena S, Swetha D, Karthik L, Kumar G, Bhaskara Rao KV. Evaluating the effectiveness of marine actinobacterial extract and its mediated titanium dioxide nanoparticles in the degradation of azo dyes. J Environ Sci. 2014;26:775–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Arbade G, Landage K, Khanna P, Bhongale C. Biological approach to synthesize TiO2 nanoparticles using Staphylococcus aureus for antibacterial and antibiofilm applications. 2020.

  113. Abdel-Maksoud G, Abdel-Nasser M, Hassan S, Eid A, Abdel-Nasser A, Fouda A. Biosynthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using probiotic bacterial strain, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and evaluate of their biocompatibility and antifungal activity. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. 2023;1–23.

  114. Rathore C, Yadav VK, Amari A, Meena A, Chinedu Egbosiuba T, Verma RK, et al. Synthesis and characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticles from Bacillus subtilis MTCC 8322 and its application for the removal of methylene blue and orange G dyes under UV light and visible light. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;11:1323249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Mansoor A, Khan MT, Mehmood M, Khurshid Z, Ali MI, Jamal A. Synthesis and characterization of Titanium Oxide nanoparticles with a novel biogenic process for Dental Application. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:1078.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Chakravarty P, Deka H, Chowdhury D. Anthracene removal potential of green synthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs) and Alcaligenes faecalis HP8 from contaminated soil. Chemosphere. 2023;321:138102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Taran M, Rad M, Alavi M. Biosynthesis of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles by Halomonas elongata IBRC-M 10214 in different conditions of medium. BioImpacts BI. 2018;8:81–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Elghwas D. Biosynthesis and evaluation of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles from in vitro stimulation of Lactobacillus johnsonii. 2018.

  119. Khan R, Fulekar MH. Biosynthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Bacillus amyloliquefaciens culture and enhancement of its photocatalytic activity for the degradation of a sulfonated textile dye reactive red 31. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;475:184–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Jayaseelan C, Rahuman AA, Roopan SM, Kirthi AV, Venkatesan J, Kim S-K, et al. Biological approach to synthesize TiO2 nanoparticles using Aeromonas hydrophila and its antibacterial activity. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2013;107:82–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Babitha S, Korrapati PS. Biosynthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using a probiotic from coal fly ash effluent. Mater Res Bull. 2013;48:4738–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Dhandapani P, Maruthamuthu S, Rajagopal G. Bio-mediated synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles and its photocatalytic effect on aquatic biofilm. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2012;110:43–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Singh P, Sreedharan V, Damodharan S, Loganathan K, Kumar G, Rao B. Evaluating the effectivness of marine actinobacterial extract and its mediated titanium dioxide nanoparticle in the degradation of azo dyes. J Environ Sci. 2013;26.

  124. Abou El-Enain I, Abed N, Abu Senna A, Abdelkhalek E, Safwat N, Yosri M. In vitro testing of biomedical applications of biosynthesized titanium nanoparticles using Saccharopolyspora spinosa. Egypt J Chem. 2023;0:0–0.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Adebayo EA, Azeez MA, Alao MB, Oke AM, Aina DA. Fungi as veritable tool in current advances in nanobiotechnology. Heliyon. 2021;7:e08480.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Šebesta M, Vojtková H, Cyprichová V, Ingle AP, Urík M, Kolenčík M. Mycosynthesis of metal-containing nanoparticles—synthesis by Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes and their application. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Sonawane H, Shelke D, Chambhare M, Dixit N, Math S, Sen S, et al. Fungi-derived agriculturally important nanoparticles and their application in crop stress management – prospects and environmental risks. Environ Res. 2022;212:113543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Muhammad M, Ahmad J, Basit A, Khan A, Mohamed H, Ullah I et al. Biogenic synthesis of nanoparticles mediated by microorganisms is a novel approach for creating antimicrobial agents. 2023.

  129. Li Q, Liu F, Li M, Chen C, Gadd GM. Nanoparticle and nanomineral production by fungi. Fungal Biol Rev. 2022;41:31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Antar M, Lyu D, Nazari M, Shah A, Zhou X, Smith DL. Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: an overview of world biomass production and utilization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;139:110691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Kim D-Y, Kim M, Sung J-S, Koduru JR, Nile SH, Syed A, et al. Extracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticle using yeast extracts: antibacterial and seed priming applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024;108:150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Gajbhiye M, Kesharwani J, Ingle A, Gade A, Rai M. Fungus-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their activity against pathogenic fungi in combination with fluconazole. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2009;5:382–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Sun J, Xu S, Du Y, Yu K, Jiang Y, Weng H, et al. Accumulation and Enrichment of Trace elements by yeast cells and their applications: a critical review. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1746.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Survase AA, Kanase SS. Green synthesis of TiO2 nanospheres from isolated aspergillus eucalypticola SLF1 and its multifunctionality in nanobioremediation of C. I. reactive blue 194 with antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. Ceram Int. 2023;49:14964–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Sathiyaseelan A, Saravanakumar K, Naveen KV, Han K-S, Zhang X, Jeong MS, et al. Combination of Paraconiothyrium brasiliense fabricated titanium dioxide nanoparticle and antibiotics enhanced antibacterial and antibiofilm properties: a toxicity evaluation. Environ Res. 2022;212:113237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Bishop KS. Characterisation of extracts and anti-cancer activities of Fomitopsis pinicola. Nutrients. 2020;12:609.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Chinnaperumal K, Govindasamy B, Paramasivam D, Dilipkumar A, Dhayalan A, Vadivel A, et al. Bio-pesticidal effects of Trichoderma viride formulated titanium dioxide nanoparticle and their physiological and biochemical changes on Helicoverpa armigera (hub). Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2018;149:26–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Arya S, Sonawane H, Math S, Tambade P, Chaskar M, Shinde D. Biogenic titanium nanoparticles (TiO2NPs) from Tricoderma citrinoviride extract: synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity against extremely drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int Nano Lett. 2021;11:35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Pasquoto-Stigliani T, Guilger-Casagrande M, Campos EVR, Germano-Costa T, Bilesky-José N, Migliorini BB, et al. Titanium biogenic nanoparticles to help the growth of Trichoderma Harzianum to be used in biological control. J Nanobiotechnol. 2023;21:166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Abd El Hamid DK, Desouky EM, AbdEllatif S, Abed N, Mahfouz AY. Green Synthesis and characterization of Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles by Aspergillus Niger DS22 and its potential application in Medical Fields. Egypt J Bot. 2024;64:629–53.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Rajakumar G, Rahuman AA, Roopan SM, Khanna VG, Elango G, Kamaraj C, et al. Fungus-mediated biosynthesis and characterization of TiO2 nanoparticles and their activity against pathogenic bacteria. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2012;91:23–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Kumaravel J, Lalitha K, Arunthirumeni M, Shivakumar MS. Mycosynthesis of bimetallic zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles for control of Spodoptera frugiperda. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2021;178:104910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Manimaran K, Loganathan S, Prakash DG, Natarajan D. Antibacterial and anticancer potential of mycosynthesized titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles using Hypsizygus ulmarius. Biomass Convers Biorefinery [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Apr 15]; https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s13399-022-03186-6

  144. Manimaran K, Murugesan S, Ragavendran C, Balasubramani G, Natarajan D, Ganesan A, et al. Biosynthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using Edible Mushroom (Pleurotus Djamor) Extract: Mosquito Larvicidal, Histopathological, Antibacterial and Anticancer Effect. J Clust Sci. 2021;32:1229–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Lingaraju K, Basavaraj RB, Jayanna K, Devaraja SB, Kumar Swamy S. Biocompatible fabrication of TiO2 nanoparticles: Antimicrobial, anticoagulant, antiplatelet, direct hemolytic and cytotoxicity properties. Inorg Chem Commun. 2021;127:108505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Jha AK, Prasad K, Kulkarni AR. Synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using microorganisms. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2009;71:226–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Peiris MMK, Gunasekara T, Jayaweera PM, Fernando SSN. TiO2 nanoparticles from Baker’s yeast: a potent Antimicrobial. 2018;28:1664–70.

  148. Chung YH, Cai H, Steinmetz NF. Viral nanoparticles for drug delivery, imaging, immunotherapy, and theranostic applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;156:214–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Iravani S, Zolfaghari B. Plant viruses and bacteriophages for eco-friendly synthesis of nanoparticles: recent trends and important challenges. Comments Inorg Chem. 2021;42.

  150. Koudelka KJ, Pitek AS, Manchester M, Steinmetz NF. Virus-based nanoparticles as versatile nanomachines. Annu Rev Virol. 2015;2:379–401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Zhou Z, Bedwell GJ, Li R, Prevelige PE, Gupta A. Formation mechanism of chalcogenide nanocrystals confined inside genetically engineered virus-like particles. Sci Rep. 2014;4:3832.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. Moon J-S, Kim W-G, Kim C, Park G-T, Heo J, Yoo SY, et al. M13 bacteriophage-based self-assembly structures and their functional capabilities. Mini-Rev Org Chem. 2015;12:271–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Chaudhary R, Nawaz K, Khan AK, Hano C, Abbasi BH, Anjum S. An overview of the algae-mediated biosynthesis of nanoparticles and their Biomedical Applications. Biomolecules. 2020;10:1498.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Alprol A, Mansour A, Abdelwahab A, Ashour M. Advances in Green Synthesis of Metal Oxide nanoparticles by Marine Algae for Wastewater Treatment by Adsorption and Photocatalysis Techniques. Catalysts. 2023;13:888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. El-Sheekh MM, Morsi HH, Hassan LHS, Ali SS. The efficient role of algae as green factories for nanotechnology and their vital applications. Microbiol Res. 2022;263:127111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Hifney AF, Soliman Z, Ali EF, Hussein NA. Microbial and microscopic investigations to assess the susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis and Prototheca ciferrii to phyco-synthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticles and antimicrobial drugs. South Afr J Bot. 2022;151:791–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Ka VV. Synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Spirulina platensis algae extract. Pharma Innov. 2022;11:266–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Mathivanan D, Kamaraj C, Suseem SR, Gandhi PR, Malafaia G. Seaweed Sargassum wightii mediated preparation of TiO2 nanoparticles, larvicidal activity against malaria and filariasis vectors, and its effect on non-target organisms. Environ Res. 2023;225:115569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Balaraman P, Balasubramanian B, Liu W-C, Kaliannan D, Durai M, Kamyab H, et al. Sargassum myriocystum-mediated TiO2-nanoparticles and their antimicrobial, larvicidal activities and enhanced photocatalytic degradation of various dyes. Environ Res. 2022;204:112278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Alarif WM, Shaban YA, Orif MI, Ghandourah MA, Turki AJ, Alorfi HS, et al. Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using natural Marine extracts for Antifouling Activity. Mar Drugs. 2023;21:62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  161. Mathivanan D, Kamaraj C, Suseem SR, Gandhi PR, Malafaia G. Seaweed Sargassum wightii mediated preparation of TiO2 nanoparticles, larvicidal activity against malaria and filariasis vectors, and its effect on non-target organisms. Environ Res. 2023;225:115569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Caliskan G, Mutaf Kılıç T, Agba H, Elibol M. Green Synthesis and characterization of Titanium nanoparticles using Microalga, Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Geomicrobiol J. 2021;39:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Balaraman P, Balasubramanian B, Liu W-C, Durairaj K, Mahendran, Kamyab H, et al. Sargassum myriocystum mediated TiO2-nanoparticles and their antimicrobial, larvicidal activities and enhanced photocatalytic degradation of various dyes. Environ Res. 2021;204:112278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Sidorowicz A, Margarita V, Fais G, Pantaleo A, Manca A, Concas A, et al. Characterization of nanomaterials synthesized from Spirulina platensis extract and their potential antifungal activity. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0274753.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. Díez-Pascual AM. Surface Engineering of nanomaterials with polymers, biomolecules, and small ligands for Nanomedicine. Materials. 2022;15:3251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. Szczyglewska P, Feliczak-Guzik A, Nowak I. Nanotechnology–General aspects: a Chemical Reduction Approach to the synthesis of nanoparticles. Molecules. 2023;28:4932.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  167. kazemi S, Hosseingholian A, Gohari SD, Feirahi F, Moammeri F, Mesbahian G, et al. Recent advances in green synthesized nanoparticles: from production to application. Mater Today Sustain. 2023;24:100500.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Razi M, Contreras-Mateus M, Hashlamoun KW, Nassar NN, Nanoparticles. Preparation, Stabilization, and Control Over Particle Size. In: Nassar NN, Cortés FB, Franco CA, editors. Nanoparticles Emerg Technol Oil Prod Process Appl [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021 [cited 2024 May 17]. pp. 1–40. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-319-12051-5_1

  169. Villaverde-Cantizano G, Laurenti M, Rubio-Retama J, Contreras-Cáceres R. Reducing Agents in Colloidal Nanoparticle Synthesis – an Introduction. 2021 [cited 2024 May 17]; https://books.rsc.org/books/edited-volume/912/chapter/708253/Reducing-Agents-in-Colloidal-Nanoparticle

  170. Florensa M, Llenas M, Medina-Gutiérrez E, Sandoval S, Tobías-Rossell G. Key parameters for the Rational Design, Synthesis, and functionalization of biocompatible mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:2703.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. Shrestha S, Wang B, Dutta P. Nanoparticle processing: understanding and controlling aggregation. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;279:102162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Josun J, Sharma P, Kumar Garg V. Optical and structural behavior of hydrothermally synthesized ZnO nanoparticles at various temperatures with NaOH molar ratios. Results Opt. 2024;14:100601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. Noviyanto A, Amalia R, Maulida PYD, Dioktyanto M, Arrosyid BH, Aryanto D, et al. Anomalous temperature-Induced particle size reduction in Manganese Oxide nanoparticles. ACS Omega. 2023;8:45152–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  174. Liu H, Zhang H, Wang J, Wei J. Effect of temperature on the size of biosynthesized silver nanoparticle: deep insight into microscopic kinetics analysis. Arab J Chem. 2017;13.

  175. Drummer S, Madzimbamuto T, Chowdhury M. Green synthesis of transition-metal nanoparticles and their oxides: a review. Materials. 2021;14:2700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Marciniak L, Nowak M, Trojanowska A, Tylkowski B, Jastrzab R. The Effect of pH on the size of silver nanoparticles obtained in the reduction reaction with citric and malic acids. Materials. 2020;13:5444.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. Oake A, Bhatt P, Pathak YV. Understanding Surface Characteristics of Nanoparticles. In: Pathak YV, editor. Surf Modif Nanoparticles Target Drug Deliv [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019 [cited 2024 May 17]. pp. 1–17. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-06115-9_1

  178. Wu K-J, Tse ECM, Shang C, Guo Z. Nucleation and growth in solution synthesis of nanostructures – from fundamentals to advanced applications. Prog Mater Sci. 2022;123:100821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  179. Abdullah JAA, Díaz-García Á, Law JY, Romero A, Franco V, Guerrero A. Sustainable nanomagnetism: investigating the influence of Green Synthesis and pH on Iron Oxide nanoparticles for enhanced Biomedical Applications. Polymers. 2023;15:3850.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. Naito M, Yokoyama T, Hosokawa K, Nogi K, editors. Chapter 3 - Characteristics and Behavior of Nanoparticles and Its Dispersion Systems. Nanoparticle Technol Handb Third Ed [Internet]. Elsevier; 2018 [cited 2024 May 17]. pp. 109–68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444641106000032

  181. Saleh HM, Hassan AI. Synthesis and characterization of nanomaterials for application in cost-effective Electrochemical devices. Sustainability. 2023;15:10891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Mohamed AE, Elgammal WE, Eid AM, Dawaba AM, Ibrahim AG, Fouda A, et al. Synthesis and characterization of new functionalized chitosan and its antimicrobial and in-vitro release behavior from topical gel. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;207:242–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Fouda A, Hassan SE-D, Eid AM, Awad MA, Althumayri K, Badr NF, et al. Endophytic bacterial strain, Brevibacillus brevis-mediated green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles, characterization, antifungal, in vitro cytotoxicity, and larvicidal activity. Green Process Synth. 2022;11:931–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. Inkson BJ. 2 - Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for materials characterization. In: Hübschen G, Altpeter I, Tschuncky R, Herrmann H-G, editors. Mater Charact Using Nondestruct Eval NDE Methods [Internet]. Woodhead Publishing; 2016 [cited 2024 Mar 22]. pp. 17–43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978008100040300002X

  185. Jagadeesh P, Rangappa SM, Siengchin S. Advanced characterization techniques for nanostructured materials in biomedical applications. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res. 2024;7:122–43.

    Google Scholar 

  186. Mourdikoudis S, Pallares M, Thanh RK. Characterization techniques for nanoparticles: comparison and complementarity upon studying nanoparticle properties. Nanoscale. 2018;10:12871–934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Fouda A, Hassan SE-D, Saied E, Hamza MF. Photocatalytic degradation of real textile and tannery effluent using biosynthesized magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgO-NPs), heavy metal adsorption, phytotoxicity, and antimicrobial activity. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9:105346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Altammar KA. A review on nanoparticles: characteristics, synthesis, applications, and challenges. Front Microbiol [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Mar 3];14. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1155622

  189. Rahman M, Islam KS, Dip TM, Chowdhury MFM, Debnath SR, Hasan SMM et al. A review on nanomaterial-based additive manufacturing: dynamics in properties, prospects, and challenges. Prog Addit Manuf [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Mar 22]; https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s40964-023-00514-8

  190. Harun-Ur-Rashid M, Jahan I, Foyez T, Imran AB. Bio-inspired nanomaterials for Micro/Nanodevices: a new era in Biomedical Applications. Micromachines. 2023;14:1786.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  191. Armaković SJ, Savanović MM, Armaković S. Titanium Dioxide as the most used photocatalyst for Water Purification: an overview. Catalysts. 2023;13:26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. Tamrakar D, Thakur S. Nanotechnology’s application in cosmetics: dermatology and skin care items. Migr Lett. 2023;20:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  193. Ge S, Sang D, Zou L, Yao Y, Zhou C, Fu H, et al. A review on the progress of Optoelectronic devices based on TiO2 Thin films and nanomaterials. Nanomaterials. 2023;13:1141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. Nassar A-RA, Eid AM, Atta HM, El Naghy WS, Fouda A. Exploring the antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer, biocompatibility, and larvicidal activities of selenium nanoparticles fabricated by endophytic fungal strain Penicillium Verhagenii. Sci Rep. 2023;13:9054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  195. Ikram M, Javed B, Hassan SWU, Satti SH, Sarwer A, Raja NI, et al. Therapeutic potential of biogenic titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review on mechanistic approaches. Nanomed. 2021;16:1429–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. Santhoshkumar T, Rahuman AA, Jayaseelan C, Rajakumar G, Marimuthu S, Kirthi AV, et al. Green synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Psidium guajava extract and its antibacterial and antioxidant properties. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2014;7:968–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. Alavi M, Karimi N. Characterization, antibacterial, total antioxidant, scavenging, reducing power and ion chelating activities of green synthesized silver, copper and titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Artemisia haussknechtii leaf extract. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46:2066–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. Ajmal N, Saraswat K, Bakht MA, Riadi Y, Ahsan MJ, Noushad Md. Cost-effective and eco-friendly synthesis of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles using fruit’s peel agro-waste extracts: characterization, in vitro antibacterial, antioxidant activities. Green Chem Lett Rev. 2019;12:244–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  199. Kaviyarasu K. Investigate the biological activities of Lawsonia inermis extract synthesized from TiO doped graphene oxide nanoparticles. Microsc Res Tech. 2024;87:2425–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  200. Sundar V, Balasubramanian B, Sivakumar M, Chinnaraj S, Palani V, Maluventhen V, et al. An eco-friendly synthesis of titanium oxide nanoparticles mediated from Syringodium isoetifolium and evaluate its biological activity and photocatalytic dye degradation. Inorg Chem Commun. 2024;161:112125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  201. Thakur N, Thakur N, Kumar K. Phytochemically and PVP stabilized TiO2 nanospheres for enhanced photocatalytic and antioxidant efficiency. Mater Today Commun. 2023;35:105587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  202. Wongchai A, On-uma R, Jutamas K, Salmen S, Alharbi S, Joshi D, et al. Antibacterial, antifungal, antidiabetic, and antioxidant activities potential of Coleus aromaticus synthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Environ Res. 2022;216:114714.

    Google Scholar 

  203. Rajeswari VD, Eed EM, Elfasakhany A, Badruddin IA, Kamangar S, Brindhadevi K. Green synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Laurus nobilis (bay leaf): antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Appl Nanosci. 2023;13:1477–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  204. Venkatappa MM, Udagani C, Hanume Gowda SM, Venkataramaiah S, Casini R, Moussa IM, et al. Green synthesised TiO2 nanoparticles-mediated Terenna Asiatica: evaluation of their role in reducing oxidative stress, inflammation and human breast Cancer Proliferation. Molecules. 2023;28:5126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  205. Chahardoli A, Minoosh Siavosh Haghighi Z, Shokoohinia Y, Fattahi A. Plant based biosynthesis of TiO2NPs and evaluation of their cytotoxicity, antihemolytic, and protein antidenaturation effects. South Afr J Bot. 2023;163:37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. Kalyanasundaram S, Prakash MJ. Biosynthesis and characterization of Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles using Pithecellobium Dulce and Lagenaria Siceraria Aqueous Leaf Extract and screening their free radical scavenging and Antibacterial properties. Int Lett Chem Phys Astron. 2015;50:80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  207. Helmy ET, Abouellef EM, Soliman UA, Pan JH. Novel green synthesis of S-doped TiO2 nanoparticles using Malva parviflora plant extract and their photocatalytic, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities under sunlight illumination. Chemosphere. 2021;271:129524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. Victor WS, Vijayakumar S, Vidhya E, Punitha VN, Nilavukkarasi M, Praseetha PK. Biogenesis of TiO2 nanoparticles: an approach to prove multidisciplinary application. Green Synth Catal. 2022;3:150–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. Chinemerem Nwobodo D, Ugwu MC, Oliseloke Anie C, Al-Ouqaili MTS, Chinedu Ikem J, Victor Chigozie U, et al. Antibiotic resistance: the challenges and some emerging strategies for tackling a global menace. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36:e24655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  210. Wahab S, Salman A, Khan Z, Khan S, Krishnaraj C, Yun S-I. Metallic nanoparticles: a promising Arsenal against Antimicrobial Resistance—Unraveling mechanisms and enhancing medication efficacy. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:14897.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  211. Prakash J, Cho J, Mishra YK. Photocatalytic TiO2 nanomaterials as potential antimicrobial and antiviral agents: scope against blocking the SARS-COV-2 spread. Micro Nano Eng. 2022;14:100100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  212. Rodríguez-González V, Obregón S, Patrón-Soberano OA, Terashima C, Fujishima A. An approach to the photocatalytic mechanism in the TiO2-nanomaterials microorganism interface for the control of infectious processes. Appl Catal B Environ. 2020;270:118853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  213. Jesline A, John NP, Narayanan PM, Vani C, Murugan S. Antimicrobial activity of zinc and titanium dioxide nanoparticles against biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Nanosci. 2015;5:157–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  214. Kubacka A, Diez MS, Rojo D, Bargiela R, Ciordia S, Zapico I, et al. Understanding the antimicrobial mechanism of TiO2-based nanocomposite films in a pathogenic bacterium. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  215. Younis AB, Milosavljevic V, Fialova T, Smerkova K, Michalkova H, Svec P, et al. Synthesis and characterization of TiO2 nanoparticles combined with geraniol and their synergistic antibacterial activity. BMC Microbiol. 2023;23:207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  216. Petica A, Florea A, Gaidau C, Balan D, Anicai L. Synthesis and characterization of silver-titania nanocomposites prepared by electrochemical method with enhanced photocatalytic characteristics, antifungal and antimicrobial activity. J Mater Res Technol. 2019;8:41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  217. Hosseini Nasab N, Jalili MM, Farrokhpay S. Application of paraffin and silver coated titania nanoparticles in polyethylene nanocomposite food packaging films. J Appl Polym Sci. 2018;135:45913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  218. Sharma S, Byrne M, Perera KY, Duffy B, Jaiswal AK, Jaiswal S. Active film packaging based on bio-nanocomposite TiO2 and cinnamon essential oil for enhanced preservation of cheese quality. Food Chem. 2023;405:134798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  219. Devilakshmi M, Ramasubburayan R. Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using Terminalia chebula and its potent antibiofilm activity against dental caries-associated bacterium Streptococcus mutans. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2023;54:102953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  220. Jin Y, Li B, Saravanakumar K, Hu X, Wang M-H. Phytogenic Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles derived from Rosa davurica with anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm activities. J Clust Sci. 2022;33:1435–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  221. Renitta E, Jeba J, Dhanaraj A, Paul S. Biological synthesis and characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticle from Cynodon dactylon. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng. 2022;113:31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  222. Hassan H, Omoniyi KI, Okibe FG, Nuhu AA, Echioba EG. Evaluation of Antibacterial potential of Biosynthesized Plant Leave Extract mediated Titanium Oxide nanoparticles using Hypheae Thiebeace and Anannos Seneglensis. J Appl Sci Environ Manag. 2019;23:1795–804.

    Google Scholar 

  223. Achudhan D, Vijayakumar S, Malaikozhundan B, Divya M, Jothirajan M, Subbian K, et al. The antibacterial, antibiofilm, antifogging and mosquitocidal activities of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles green-synthesized using multiple plants extracts. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020;8:104521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  224. Vijayakumar S, Vidhya E, Anand GC, Nilavukkarasi M, Punitha VN, Sakthivel B. Eco friendly synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using aqueous Ocimum americanum L. leaf extracts and their antimicrobial, anti-proliferative and photocatalytic activities. Vegetos. 2020;33:805–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  225. Jalill RDA, Nuaman RS, Abd AN. Biological synthesis of Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles by Curcuma longa plant extract and study its biological properties. 2016 [cited 2024 Mar 24]. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Biological-synthesis-of-Titanium-Dioxide-by-Curcuma-Jalill-Nuaman/cc51b10f84469a22b8014a257c1392c11ead9bac

  226. Ahmad N, Abdullah N, Md Yasin F. Antifungal activity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles against Candida albicans. BioResources. 2019;14:8866–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  227. Sevugapperumal N. Antifungal activity of nanofungicideagainst Macrophomina phaseolina. 2016.

  228. Chougale R, Kasai D, Nayak S, Masti S, Nasalapure A, Anjanapura R. Design of Eco-friendly PVA/TiO 2 based nanocomposites and their antifungal activity study. Green Mater. 2019;8:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  229. do Carmo PHF, Garcia MT, Figueiredo-Godoi LMA, Lage ACP, da Silva NS, Junqueira JC. Metal nanoparticles to Combat Candida albicans infections: an update. Microorganisms. 2023;11:138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  230. Chen F, Yang X, Wu Q. Antifungal capability of TiO2 coated film on moist wood. Build Environ. 2009;44:1088–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  231. Filpo G, Palermo A, Rachiele F, Nicoletta F. Preventing fungal growth in wood by titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2013;85:217–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  232. Shukla M, Narain S, Kumar A, Dikshit A. Characterization of titanium dioxide nanomaterials synthesized from leaf extract of Pogostemon cablin Benth and their potential antifungal activity. Phys Scr. 2024;99:0659d3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  233. Saka A, Shifera Y, Jule LT, Badassa B, Nagaprasad N, Shanmugam R, et al. Biosynthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles by Caricaceae (papaya) shell extracts for antifungal application. Sci Rep. 2022;12:15960.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  234. Salcedo SAM, Torres SNC, Kopytko MI, Muñóz CS, Guzmán DMV, Lozano RC et al. Antifungal evaluation of TiO2 nanoparticles that inhibit Fusarium solani in African oil palm. Int J Agric Nat Resour [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Oct 29];47. https://rcia.uc.cl/index.php/ijanr/article/view/2170

  235. Habibi-Yangjeh A, Davari M, Manafi‐Yeldagermani R, Asl SA, Enaiati S, Ebadollahi A, et al. Antifungal activity of TiO2/AgBr nanocomposites on some phytopathogenic fungi. Food Sci Nutr. 2021;9:3815.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  236. Rathi VH, Jeice AR, Jayakumar K. Green synthesis of Ag/CuO and Ag/ TiO2 < math > < mrow is=true>Ti < msub is=true>O< mn is=true>2 nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic dye degradation, antibacterial, and antifungal properties. Appl Surf Sci Adv. 2023;18:100476.

  237. Akhtar S, Shahzad K, Mushtaq S, Ali I, Rafe MH, Fazal-ul-Karim SM. Antibacterial and antiviral potential of colloidal Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles suitable for biological applications. Mater Res Express. 2019;6:105409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  238. Mazurkova N, Poletaeva Y, Shikina N, Ismagilov Z, Zagrebelny S, Ryabchikova E. Interaction of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with influenza virus. Nanotechnologies Russ. 2010;5:417–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  239. Monmaturapoj N, Sri-on A, Klinsukhon W, Boonnak K, Prahsarn C. Antiviral activity of multifunctional composite based on TiO2-modified hydroxyapatite. Mater Sci Eng C. 2018;92:96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  240. Miyauchi M, Sunada K, Hashimoto K. Antiviral effect of visible light-sensitive CuxO/TiO2 Photocatalyst. Catalysts. 2020;10:1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  241. Hamza RZ, Gobouri AA, Al-Yasi HM, Al-Talhi TA, El-Megharbel SM. A New Sterilization Strategy using TiO2 nanotubes for production of free radicals that eliminate viruses and application of a treatment strategy to Combat infections caused by emerging SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Coatings. 2021;11:680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  242. Vadlamani BS, Uppal T, Verma SC, Misra M. Functionalized TiO2 Nanotube-based Electrochemical Biosensor for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2. Sensors. 2020;20:5871.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  243. Al-Musawi S, Almansorri AK, Al-Shirifi HMH, Ahmed BB, Haider AJ. Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles: a Novel Approach for Inhibiting Human Papillomavirus. Iraqi J Sci. 2024;1320–30.

  244. León-Gutiérrez G, Elste JE, Cabello-Gutiérrez C, Millán-Pacheco C, Martínez-Gómez MH, Mejía-Alvarez R, et al. A potent virucidal activity of functionalized TiO2 nanoparticles adsorbed with flavonoids against SARS-CoV-2. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;106:5987–6002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  245. Acuña-Fuentes NL, Vargas-Hernandez M, Rivero-Montejo S, de Rivas-Ramirez J, Macias-Bobadilla LK, Palos-Barba I. Antiviral activity of TiO2 NPs against Tobacco Mosaic Virus in Chili Pepper (Capsicum annuum L). Agriculture. 2022;12:2101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  246. Xu K, Li F, Ma L, Wang B, Zhang H, Ni M, et al. Mechanism of enhanced Bombyx mori Nucleopolyhedrovirus-Resistance by Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles in Silkworm. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0118222.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  247. Abo Nahas H, Abdel Rahman M, Gupta V, Abdel-Azeem A. Myco-antioxidants: insights into the natural metabolic treasure and their biological effects. Sydowia -Horn-. 2023;75:151–79.

    Google Scholar 

  248. Mukherjee K, Acharya K, Biswas A, Jana NR. TiO2 nanoparticles co-doped with Nitrogen and Fluorine as visible-light-activated Antifungal agents. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2020;3:2016–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  249. Fathi MS, El-Sheshtawy NM, Youssef SS, Ghareeb A. Multiplex PCR identification of eight clinically relevant Candida species isolated from groin fungal infections among Egyptian patients. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2016;11:09–16.

    Google Scholar 

  250. Benedict K, Jackson BR, Chiller T, Beer KD. Estimation of direct healthcare costs of fungal diseases in the United States. Clin Infect Dis off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2019;68:1791–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  251. Zhu X, Chen Y, Yu D, Fang W, Liao W, Pan W. Progress in the application of nanoparticles for the treatment of fungal infections: a review. Mycology. 2024;15:1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  252. Li B, Pan L, Zhang H, Xie L, Wang X, Shou J et al. Recent Developments on Using Nanomaterials to Combat Candida albicans. Front Chem [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 May 18];9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fchem.2021.813973

  253. Mba IE, Nweze EI. The use of nanoparticles as alternative therapeutic agents against Candida infections: an up-to-date overview and future perspectives. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;36:163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  254. Nahas A. Endophytic fungi: a gold mine of antioxidants. Microb Biosyst. 2019;4:58–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  255. Franco-Castillo I, Hierro L, de la Fuente JM, Seral-Ascaso A, Mitchell SG. Perspectives for antimicrobial nanomaterials in cultural heritage conservation. Chem. 2021;7:629–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  256. Guerra FL, Giordani C, Zucchetti L, Ribas R, Masuero AB, Dal Molin DCC, et al. The effectiveness of spraying nTiO2 on Coating mortars in historical buildings aimed at reducing Fungal Growth. Buildings. 2023;13:2751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  257. Skłodowski K, Chmielewska-Deptuła SJ, Piktel E, Wolak P, Wollny T, Bucki R. Metallic nanosystems in the development of antimicrobial strategies with high antimicrobial activity and high biocompatibility. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:2104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  258. Hussain FS, Abro NQ, Ahmed N, Memon SQ, Memon N. Nano-antivirals: A comprehensive review. Front Nanotechnol [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Mar 23];4. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fnano.2022.1064615

  259. Hernández M, Bobadilla I, Guevara-Gonzalez R, Rico-García E, Ocampo-Velázquez R, Juarez L, et al. Nanoparticles as potential antivirals in Agriculture. Agriculture. 2020;10:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  260. Farley MM. 2009 H1N1 Influenza: A Twenty-First Century Pandemic With Roots in the Early Twentieth Century. Am J Med Sci. 2010;340:202–8.

  261. Ammar RA, Montasser K, Ezz H, Albishi LA, Ghareeb A. Rapid detection and clinical spectrum of the novel influenza H1N1 strain in a diabetic pediatric population. J Med Virol. 2019;91:1616–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  262. Matsuura R, Lo C-W, Wada S, Somei J, Ochiai H, Murakami T, et al. SARS-CoV-2 disinfection of air and surface contamination by TiO2 photocatalyst-mediated damage to viral morphology, RNA, and Protein. Viruses. 2021;13:942.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  263. Bono N, Ponti F, Punta C, Candiani G. Effect of UV irradiation and TiO2-Photocatalysis on Airborne Bacteria and viruses: an overview. Materials. 2021;14:1075.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  264. Giri PM, Banerjee A, Layek B. A recent review on Cancer Nanomedicine. Cancers. 2023;15:2256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  265. Ezike TC, Okpala US, Onoja UL, Nwike CP, Ezeako EC, Okpara OJ, et al. Advances in drug delivery systems, challenges and future directions. Heliyon. 2023;9:e17488.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  266. Ziental D, Czarczynska-Goslinska B, Mlynarczyk D, Glowacka-Sobotta A, Stanisz B, Goslinski T, et al. Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles: prospects and applications in Medicine. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:387.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  267. Tewabe A, Abate A, Tamrie M, Seyfu A, Abdela Siraj E. Targeted drug delivery — from magic bullet to Nanomedicine: principles, challenges, and future perspectives. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:1711–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  268. Khursheed R, Dua K, Vishwas S, Gulati M, Jha NK, Aldhafeeri GM, et al. Biomedical applications of metallic nanoparticles in cancer: current status and future perspectives. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;150:112951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  269. Priya S, Desai VM, Singhvi G. Surface modification of lipid-based nanocarriers: a potential Approach to enhance targeted drug delivery. ACS Omega. 2023;8:74–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  270. Venkatasubbu GD, Ramasamy S, Reddy GP, Kumar J. In vitro and in vivo anticancer activity of surface modified paclitaxel attached hydroxyapatite and titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Biomed Microdevices. 2013;15:711–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  271. Ai J-W, Liu B, Liu W-D. Folic acid-tagged titanium dioxide nanoparticles for enhanced anticancer effect in osteosarcoma cells. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;76:1181–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  272. Ren W, Zeng L, Shen Z, Xiang L, Gong A, Zhang J, et al. Enhanced doxorubicin transport to multidrug resistant breast cancer cells via TiO2 nanocarriers. RSC Adv. 2013;3:20855–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  273. Liu E, Zhou Y, Liu Z, Li J, Zhang D, Chen J, et al. Cisplatin Loaded Hyaluronic Acid modified TiO2 nanoparticles for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Ovarian Cancer. J Nanomater. 2015;2015:e390358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  274. Chen Y, Wan Y, Wang Y, Zhang H, Jiao Z. Anticancer efficacy enhancement and attenuation of side effects of doxorubicin with titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed. 2011;6:2321–6.

    Google Scholar 

  275. Yoo HS, Lee KH, Oh JE, Park TG. In vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activities of nanoparticles based on doxorubicin-PLGA conjugates. J Control Release off J Control Release Soc. 2000;68:419–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  276. Rahim MA, Jan N, Khan S, Shah H, Madni A, Khan A, et al. Recent advancements in Stimuli Responsive Drug Delivery platforms for active and Passive Cancer Targeting. Cancers. 2021;13:670.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  277. Dunkel P, Ilaš J. Targeted Cancer Therapy using compounds activated by light. Cancers. 2021;13:3237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  278. Yin M, Ju E, Chen Z, Li Z, Ren J, Qu X. Upconverting nanoparticles with a mesoporous TiO2 Shell for Near-Infrared-Triggered Drug Delivery and synergistic targeted Cancer therapy. Chem – Eur J. 2014;20:14012–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  279. Nešić M, Žakula J, Korićanac L, Stepić M, Radoičić M, Popović I, et al. Light controlled metallo-drug delivery system based on the TiO2-nanoparticles and Ru-complex. J Photochem Photobiol Chem. 2017;347:55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  280. Kim S, Im S, Park E-Y, Lee J, Kim C, Kim T-I, et al. Drug-loaded titanium dioxide nanoparticle coated with tumor targeting polymer as a sonodynamic chemotherapeutic agent for anti-cancer therapy. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2020;24:102110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  281. Nakamura H, Takada K. Reactive oxygen species in cancer: current findings and future directions. Cancer Sci. 2021;112:3945–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  282. Jiang W, Liang M, Lei Q, Li G, Wu S. The current status of photodynamic therapy in Cancer Treatment. Cancers. 2023;15:585.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  283. Correia JH, Rodrigues JA, Pimenta S, Dong T, Yang Z. Photodynamic therapy review: principles, photosensitizers, applications, and future directions. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1332.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  284. Sargazi S, Er Zeybekler S, Gelen S, Rahdar A, Bilal M, Arshad Khan R, et al. Application of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in photothermal and photodynamic therapy of cancer: an updated and comprehensive review. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2022;75:103605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  285. Liu H, Xing F, Zhou Y, Yu P, Xu J, Luo R, et al. Nanomaterials-based photothermal therapies for antibacterial applications. Mater Des. 2023;233:112231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  286. Pashootan P, Saadati F, Fahimi H, Rahmati M, Strippoli R, Zarrabi A, et al. Metal-based nanoparticles in cancer therapy: exploring photodynamic therapy and its interplay with regulated cell death pathways. Int J Pharm. 2024;649:123622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  287. Preetam S, Duhita Mondal D, Mukerjee N, Naser SS, Tabish TA, Thorat N. Revolutionizing Cancer Treatment: The Promising Horizon of Zein Nanosystems. ACS Biomater Sci Eng [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Mar 18]; https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01540

  288. Nakayama M, Smith CL, Feltis BN, Piva TJ, Tabatabaie F, Harty PD, et al. Samarium doped titanium dioxide nanoparticles as theranostic agents in radiation therapy. Phys Med PM Int J Devoted Appl Phys Med Biol off J Ital Assoc Biomed Phys AIFB. 2020;75:69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  289. Zanghelini F, Frías IAM, Rêgo MJBM, Pitta MGR, Sacilloti M, Oliveira MDL, et al. Biosensing breast cancer cells based on a three-dimensional TIO2 nanomembrane transducer. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;92:313–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  290. Zhang W, Taheri-Ledari R, Ganjali F, Afruzi FH, Hajizadeh Z, Saeidirad M, et al. Nanoscale bioconjugates: a review of the structural attributes of drug-loaded nanocarrier conjugates for selective cancer therapy. Heliyon. 2022;8:e09577.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  291. Jiang D, Otitoju TA, Ouyang Y, Shoparwe NF, Wang S, Zhang A, et al. A review on metal ions modified TiO2 for photocatalytic degradation of Organic pollutants. Catalysts. 2021;11:1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  292. Han D, Hosamo H, Ying C, Nie R. A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Nanosensors for Structural Health Monitoring in Bridge maintenance: innovations, challenges, and future perspectives. Appl Sci. 2023;13:11149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  293. Rajendrachari S, Basavegowda N, Adimule VM, Avar B, Somu P, SK RM, et al. Assessing the Food Quality using Carbon Nanomaterial based electrodes by Voltammetric Techniques. Biosensors. 2022;12:1173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  294. Malik S, Singh J, Goyat R, Saharan Y, Chaudhry V, Umar A, et al. Nanomaterials-based biosensor and their applications: a review. Heliyon. 2023;9:e19929.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  295. Jafari S, Mahyad B, Hashemzadeh H, Janfaza S, Gholikhani T, Tayebi L. Biomedical Applications of TiO2 nanostructures: recent advances. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:3447–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  296. Bertel L, Miranda DA, García-Martín JM. Nanostructured Titanium Dioxide surfaces for Electrochemical Biosensing. Sensors. 2021;21:6167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  297. Ramesh M, Janani R, Deepa C, Rajeshkumar L. Nanotechnology-enabled biosensors: a Review of fundamentals, Design principles, materials, and applications. Biosensors. 2023;13:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  298. Godja N-C, Munteanu F-D. Hybrid nanomaterials: a brief overview of versatile solutions for Sensor Technology in Healthcare and Environmental Applications. Biosensors. 2024;14:67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  299. Thakur K, Attri C, Seth A. Nanocarriers-based immobilization of enzymes for industrial application. 3 Biotech. 2021;11:427.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  300. Wang X, Li G, Liu L, Cheng Y, Zheng W, Wu S, et al. Application of titanium dioxide nanowires and electroreduced graphene oxide modified electrodes for the electrochemical detection of specific tlh gene sequence from Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Anal Methods. 2015;7:2623–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  301. Wijayanti SD, Tsvik L, Haltrich D. Recent advances in Electrochemical enzyme-based biosensors for Food and Beverage Analysis. Foods. 2023;12:3355.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  302. Mao Y, Liu X, Bao Y, Niu L. Recent advances in Photoelectrochemical Sensors for Analysis of Toxins and abused drugs in the Environment. Chemosensors. 2023;11:412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  303. Fu Y, Liu T, Wang H, Wang Z, Hou L, Jiang J, et al. Applications of nanomaterial technology in biosensing. J Sci Adv Mater Devices. 2024;9:100694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  304. Zhao W-W, Ma Z-Y, Yan D-Y, Xu J-J, Chen H-Y. In situ enzymatic ascorbic acid production as Electron Donor for CdS Quantum dots equipped TiO2 nanotubes: a general and efficient Approach for New Photoelectrochemical Immunoassay. Anal Chem. 2012;84:10518–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  305. Lee Y-L, Lo Y-S. Highly efficient Quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell based on co-sensitization of CdS/CdSe. Adv Funct Mater. 2009;19:604–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  306. Bernacka-Wojcik I, Senadeera R, Wojcik PJ, Silva LB, Doria G, Baptista P, et al. Inkjet printed and doctor blade TiO2 photodetectors for DNA biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron. 2010;25:1229–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  307. Liu P, Huo X, Tang Y, Xu J, Liu X, Wong DKY. A TiO2 nanosheet-g-C3N4 composite photoelectrochemical enzyme biosensor excitable by visible irradiation. Anal Chim Acta. 2017;984:86–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  308. Hussain S, Mubeen I, Ullah N, Shah SSUD, Khan BA, Zahoor M, et al. Modern diagnostic imaging technique applications and risk factors in the Medical Field: a review. BioMed Res Int. 2022;2022:5164970.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  309. Akasaka H, Mukumoto N, Nakayama M, Wang T, Yada R, Shimizu Y, et al. Investigation of the potential of using TiO2 nanoparticles as a contrast agent in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Appl Nanosci. 2020;10:3143–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  310. Brown K, Thurn T, Xin L, Liu W, Bazak R, Chen S, et al. Intracellular in situ labeling of TiO2 nanoparticles for fluorescence microscopy detection. Nano Res. 2018;11:464–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  311. Sandoval S, Yang J, Alfaro JG, Liberman A, Makale M, Chiang CE, et al. Europium Doped TiO2 Hollow nanoshells: two-photon imaging of cell binding. Chem Mater Publ Am Chem Soc. 2012;24:4222–30.

    Google Scholar 

  312. Zhang W, Wang Y, Sun X, Wang W, Chen L. Mesoporous titania based yolk–shell nanoparticles as multifunctional theranostic platforms for SERS imaging and chemo-photothermal treatment. Nanoscale. 2014;6:14514–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  313. Amin MA-A, Abu-Elsaoud AM, Nowwar AI, Abdelwahab AT, Awad MA, Hassan SE-D et al. Green synthesis of magnesium oxide nanoparticles using endophytic fungal strain to improve the growth, metabolic activities, yield traits, and phenolic compounds content of Nigella sativa L. Green Process Synth [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 14];13. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1515/gps-2023-0215/html

  314. Periakaruppan R, Romanovski V, Thirumalaisamy SK, Palanimuthu V, Sampath MP, Anilkumar A, et al. Innovations Mod Nanatechnol Sustainable Prod Agric ChemEngineering. 2023;7:61.

    Google Scholar 

  315. Ali S, Ahmad N, Dar MA, Manan S, Rani A, Alghanem SMS, et al. Nano-agrochemicals as substitutes for pesticides: prospects and risks. Plants. 2024;13:109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  316. Shaker AM. TiO2 nanoparticles as an effective nanopesticide for cotton leaf worm. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 2017;61–8.

  317. Gutiérrez-Ramírez J, Betancourt R, Aguirre-Uribe L, Cerna E, Sandoval Rangel A, Ángel E, et al. Insecticidal Effect of Zinc Oxide and Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles against Bactericera Cockerelli Sulc. (Hemiptera: Triozidae) on Tomato Solanum lycopersicum. Agronomy. 2021;11:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  318. Narayanan M, Devi PG, Natarajan D, Kandasamy S, Devarayan K, Alsehli M, et al. Green synthesis and characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using leaf extract of Pouteria campechiana and larvicidal and pupicidal activity on Aedes aegypti. Environ Res. 2021;200:111333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  319. Paret ML, Vallad GE, Averett DR, Jones JB, Olson SM. Photocatalysis: effect of light-activated nanoscale formulations of TiO(2) on Xanthomonas perforans and control of bacterial spot of tomato. Phytopathology. 2013;103:228–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  320. Shyam-Sundar N, Karthi S, Senthil Nathan S, Narayanan KR, Santoshkumar B, Sivanesh H et al. Eco-Friendly Biosynthesis of Tio2 Nanoparticles Using Desmostachya Bipinnata Extract: Larvicidal and Pupicidal Potential Against Aedes Aegypti and Spodoptera Litura and Acute Toxicity in Non-Target Organisms [Internet]. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2022 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4197033

  321. Rajakumar G, Rahuman AA, Jayaseelan C, Santhoshkumar T, Marimuthu S, Kamaraj C, et al. Solanum trilobatum extract-mediated synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to control Pediculus humanus capitis, Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum and Anopheles Subpictus. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:469–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  322. Guilger-Casagrande M, Migliorini BB, Germano-Costa T, Bilesky-José N, Harada LK, Campos EVR, et al. Beauveria Bassiana biogenic nanoparticles for the control of Noctuidae pests. Pest Manag Sci. 2024;80:1325–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  323. Satti SH, Raja NI, Javed B, Akram A, Mashwani Z-R, Ahmad MS, et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles elicited agro-morphological and physicochemical modifications in wheat plants to control Bipolaris sorokiniana. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0246880.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  324. Jalali E, Maghsoudi S, Noroozian E. A novel method for biosynthesis of different polymorphs of TiO2 nanoparticles as a protector for Bacillus thuringiensis from Ultra Violet. Sci Rep. 2020;10:426.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  325. Tesser ME, Guilger M, Bilesky-José N, Risso WE, de Lima R. Martinez CB dos R. Biogenic metallic nanoparticles (Ag, TiO2, Fe) as potential fungicides for agriculture: are they safe for the freshwater mussel Anodontites trapesialis? Chemosphere. 2022;309:136664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  326. Basavegowda N, Baek K-H. Current and future perspectives on the use of nanofertilizers for sustainable agriculture: the case of phosphorus nanofertilizer. 3 Biotech. 2021;11:357.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  327. Šebesta M, Kolenčík M, Sunil BR, Illa R, Mosnáček J, Ingle AP, et al. Field application of ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles on agricultural plants. Agronomy. 2021;11:2281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  328. Zheng L, Hong F, Lu S, Liu C. Effect of nano-TiO(2) on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2005;104:83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  329. Mahmoodzadeh H, Nabavi M, Kashefi H. Effect of Nanoscale Titanium Dioxide Particles on the Germination and Growth of Canola (Brassica napus). J Ornam Plants [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2024 Mar 24]; https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effect-of-Nanoscale-Titanium-Dioxide-Particles-on-Mahmoodzadeh-Nabavi/c0ce6fb52b4661b7debfd4d4cf998ea48582c3be

  330. Morteza E, Moaveni P, Farahani HA, Kiyani M. Study of photosynthetic pigments changes of maize (Zea mays L.) under nano Tio2 spraying at various growth stages. SpringerPlus. 2013;2:247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  331. Prakashraj R, Vijayakumar S, Punitha VN, Vidhya E, Nilavukkarasi M, Praseetha PK. Fabricated TiO2 nanofertilizers for Foliar Assimilation to Enhance Yield and Disease Resistance in Capsicum annuum L. J Plant Growth Regul. 2022;41:3387–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  332. Kolenčík M, Ernst D, Urík M, Ďurišová Ľ, Bujdoš M, Šebesta M, et al. Foliar application of low concentrations of Titanium Dioxide and Zinc Oxide nanoparticles to the common sunflower under Field conditions. Nanomater Basel Switz. 2020;10:1619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  333. Khater M. Effect of Titanium Nanoparticles (TiO2) on Growth, Yield and Chemical Constituents of Coriander Plants. 2015 [cited 2024 Mar 24]. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effect-of-Titanium-Nanoparticles-%28TiO2%29-on-Growth%2C-Khater/5923aca87232b060ae4cd83200f247a40edf6d05

  334. Thiagarajan V, Ramasubbu S. Fate and Behaviour of TiO2 nanoparticles in the soil: their impact on staple food crops. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021;232:274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  335. Khatri A, Bhateria R. Efficacy of Nanofertilizers over Chemical fertilizers in boosting agronomic production. Nat Environ Pollut Technol. 2023;22:767–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  336. Waani SPT, Irum S, Gul I, Yaqoob K, Khalid MU, Ali MA, et al. TiO2 nanoparticles dose, application method and phosphorous levels influence genotoxicity in Rice (Oryza sativa L.), soil enzymatic activities and plant growth. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;213:111977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  337. Gohari G, Mohammadi A, Akbari A, Panahirad S, Dadpour MR, Fotopoulos V, et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) promote growth and ameliorate salinity stress effects on essential oil profile and biochemical attributes of Dracocephalum moldavica. Sci Rep. 2020;10:912.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  338. Farahi SMM, Yazdi MET, Einafshar E, Akhondi M, Ebadi M, Azimipour S, et al. The effects of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles on physiological, biochemical, and antioxidant properties of Vitex plant (Vitex Agnus - Castus L). Heliyon. 2023;9:e22144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  339. Alhashimi A, Abdelkareem A, Amin MA, Nowwar AI, Fouda A, Ismail MA, et al. Eco-friendly approach to decrease the harmful effects of untreated wastewater on growth, yield, biochemical constituents, and heavy metal contents of carrot (Daucus carota L). Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2024;31:14043–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  340. Abuessawy AA, Fouda AF, Abdel-Rahman AA-HA-R, Hawata MH, Hamad NH. New modified heterocyclic-magnetite chitosan nanocomposite for efficient alizarin red dye removal: adsorption analysis and antibacterial activity [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Jul 14]. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2942142/v1

  341. Saied E, Eid AM, Hassan SE-D, Salem SS, Radwan AA, Halawa M, et al. The Catalytic activity of Biosynthesized Magnesium Oxide nanoparticles (MgO-NPs) for inhibiting the growth of pathogenic microbes, tanning Effluent Treatment, and Chromium Ion Removal. Catalysts. 2021;11:821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  342. Linley S, Thomson NR. Environmental applications of nanotechnology: Nano-enabled remediation processes in Water, Soil and Air Treatment. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021;232:59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  343. Zahra Z, Habib Z, Chung S, Badshah MA. Exposure Route of TiO2 NPs from Industrial Applications to Wastewater Treatment and their impacts on the Agro-environment. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1469.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  344. Wang A, Teng Y, Hu X, Wu L, Huang Y, Luo Y, et al. Diphenylarsinic acid contaminated soil remediation by titanium dioxide (P25) photocatalysis: degradation pathway, optimization of operating parameters and effects of soil properties. Sci Total Environ. 2016;541:348–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  345. Wang TC, Lu N, Li J, Wu Y. Plasma-TiO2 Catalytic Method for High-Efficiency remediation of p-Nitrophenol contaminated Soil in Pulsed Discharge. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:9301–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  346. Zand AD, Mikaeili Tabrizi A, Vaezi Heir A. Application of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to promote phytoremediation of Cd-polluted soil: contribution of PGPR inoculation. Bioremediat J. 2020;24:171–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  347. Daryabeigi Zand A, Tabrizi AM, Heir AV. Co-application of biochar and titanium dioxide nanoparticles to promote remediation of antimony from soil by Sorghum bicolor: metal uptake and plant response. Heliyon. 2020;6:e04669.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  348. Khalaf MM, Abdallah NY, Abd El-Lateef HM. Fine-template synthetic process of mesoporous TiO2 using ionic/nonionic surfactants as potential remediation of pb(II) from contaminated soil. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2019;16:1933–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  349. Irshad MA, Shakoor MB, Nawaz R, Yasmeen T, Arif MS, Rizwan M, et al. Green and eco-friendly synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles and their application for removal of cadmium from wastewater: reaction kinetics study. Z Für Phys Chem. 2022;236:637–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  350. Blosi M, Brigliadori A, Zanoni I, Ortelli S, Albonetti S, Costa AL. Chlorella vulgaris meets TiO2 NPs: effective sorbent/photocatalytic hybrid materials for water treatment application. J Environ Manage. 2022;304:114187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  351. Palajonnala Narasaiah B, Banoth P, Bustamante Dominguez AG, Mandal BK, Kumar CK, Barnes CHW, et al. Biogenic Photo-Catalyst TiO2 nanoparticles for remediation of Environment pollutants. ACS Omega. 2022;7:26174–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  352. Lopes A, Araújo FP, Damasceno D, Honório LMC, Morais AIS, Almeida LC, et al. TiO2/Arabic gum for Degradation of Pollutants in Water. Sustainability. 2023;15:15768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  353. Guo J, Guo X, Yang H, Zhang D, Jiang X. Construction of Bio-TiO2/Algae complex and synergetic mechanism of the acceleration of Phenol Biodegradation. Materials. 2023;16:3882.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  354. Shimi AK, Ahmed HM, Wahab M, Katheria S, Wabaidur SM, Eldesoky GE, et al. Synthesis and applications of Green synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles for photocatalytic dye degradation and antibacterial activity. J Nanomater. 2022;2022:7060388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  355. El Nemr A, Helmy ET, Gomaa EA, Eldafrawy S, Mousa M. Photocatalytic and biological activities of undoped and doped TiO2 prepared by green method for water treatment. J Environ Chem Eng. 2019;7:103385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  356. Refaey M, Abdel-Azeem AM, Abo Nahas HH, Abdel-Azeem MA, El-Saharty AA. Role of Fungi in Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with Heavy Metals. In: Abdel-Azeem AM, Yadav AN, Yadav N, Usmani Z, editors. Ind Important Fungi Sustain Dev Vol 1 Biodivers Ecol Perspect [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 1]. pp. 509–40. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-67561-5_16

  357. Golia EE. The impact of heavy metal contamination on soil quality and plant nutrition. Sustainable management of moderate contaminated agricultural and urban soils, using low cost materials and promoting circular economy. Sustain Chem Pharm. 2023;33:101046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  358. Rajendran S, Priya TAK, Khoo KS, Hoang TKA, Ng H-S, Munawaroh HSH, et al. A critical review on various remediation approaches for heavy metal contaminants removal from contaminated soils. Chemosphere. 2022;287:132369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  359. Abo Nouh FA, Gezaf SA, Abo Nahas HH, Abo Nahas YH, Vargas-De-La-Cruz C, Acosta RAS et al. Diversity of Cordyceps from Different Environmental Agroecosystems and Potential Applications. In: Abdel-Azeem AM, Yadav AN, Yadav N, Usmani Z, editors. Ind Important Fungi Sustain Dev Vol 1 Biodivers Ecol Perspect [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021 [cited 2024 Oct 31]. pp. 207–36. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-67561-5_6

  360. Mishra RK, Mentha SS, Misra Y, Dwivedi N. Emerging pollutants of severe environmental concern in water and wastewater: a comprehensive review on current developments and future research. Water-Energy Nexus. 2023;6:74–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  361. Hamza MF, Fouda A, Wei Y, El Aassy IE, Alotaibi SH, Guibal E, et al. Functionalized biobased composite for metal decontamination – insight on uranium and application to water samples collected from wells in mining areas (Sinai, Egypt). Chem Eng J. 2022;431:133967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt; Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt; and Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt, for their great cooperation and support in achieving and publishing this research work.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

This study received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Rania M. Kishk; Conceptualization, validation, resources, visualization, supervision, project administration; Ahmed Ghareeb, Amr Fouda, and Waleed M. El Kazzaz; Conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amr Fouda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghareeb, A., Fouda, A., Kishk, R.M. et al. Unlocking the potential of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: an insight into green synthesis, optimizations, characterizations, and multifunctional applications. Microb Cell Fact 23, 341 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12934-024-02609-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12934-024-02609-5

Keywords