Skip to main content

Expression and characterization of cold-adapted xylanase Xyl-L in Pichia pastoris for xylooligosaccharide (XOS) preparation

Abstract

Background

Xylan, the second most abundant polysaccharide in plant biomass, requires endoxylanases for its hydrolysis into xylooligosaccharides (XOS). Xylanases have been widely used in industries such as animal feed, bakery, juice production, and paper pulp. Recently, XOS have gained attention for their health benefits, including improved digestion, reduced cholesterol, and antioxidant effects. The cold-adapted GH10 xylanase of Antarctic origin Xyl-L was previously expressed in Escherichia coli, showing promising low-temperature activity. However, Pichia pastoris is currently a preferred host for industrial xylanase production due to its ability to express complex proteins and secrete them into the culture medium. This study explored the expression of Xyl-L in P. pastoris and evaluated its potential for XOS production using common flours as substrates, aiming for applications in the food and nutraceutical industry.

Results

Comparison between AOX1 (\(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\)) and GAP (\(\hbox {P}_{GAP}\)) promoters for recombinant Xyl-L production in P. pastoris showed that the \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\) promoter resulted in higher activity per wet-cell weight. Co-transforming \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\)-Xyl strains with plasmids encoding genes aiding in protein folding (HAC1 or PDI1) did not enhance Xyl-L catalytic activity compared to the parental \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\) strain. Thus, \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\)-Xyl was cultivated in 3 L bioreactors in fed-batch cultures; it is presumed that the enzyme is produced with glycosylations within its structure, given its migration within the SDS-PAGE gels. The produced Xyl-L was purified from the culture supernatant, resulting in peak xylanase activity after 90 h, with specific activity of 5.10 ± 0.21 U/mg, at pH 7.5 and \(25^{\circ }\)C, using beechwood xylan. It also showed a Km of 3.5 mg/mL and a kcat of 9.16 \(\hbox {s}^{-1}\). Xyl-L maintained over 80% of relative activity between pH 5.6\(-\)8.6 and \(37-44^{\circ }\) C, and was activated by \(\hbox {CaCl}_2\) and \(\hbox {MgCl}_2\), but inhibited by \(\hbox {MnCl}_2\). Xyl-L was tested using several flours (whole wheat, rye, oatmeal and all-purpose) as substrates, where XOS with a polymerization degree (DP) of 2 were obtained from each substrate, whole wheat flour generated XOS with DP 3, and XOS with DP 2, 3 and 4 were produced when beechwood xylan was used as substrate.

Conclusions

The xylanase Xyl-L was successfully expressed in P. pastoris and proved to be able to degrade various flour substrates, producing XOS with DP ranging from 2 to 4, indicating its potential applications in the nutraceutical and food industries. Further studies must be performed to optimize its production in bioreactors.

Background

After cellulose, xylan is the second most abundant polysaccharide in plant biomass and a major component of the plant cell wall [1]. This carbohydrate has a complex structure, and its hydrolysis needs cooperative action of a variety of enzymes. The most relevant enzymes involved in this process are the xylanolytic enzymes, including endoxylanases (EC 3.2.1.8), mainly grouped in the glycosyl hydrolase families 10 (GH10) and 11 (GH11). These enzymes catalyze the internal \(\beta\)-1,4-glycosidic linkages of the xylan backbone to produce xylooligosaccharides (XOS) [2]. These XOS can be decorated with different side groups (e.g. \(\alpha\)-d-glucopyranosyl uronic acid or its 4-O-methyl derivative, acetyl groups, or arabinofuranosyl residues) [3].

In industry, xylanases are widely used. They are incorporated in animal feed to improve digestion and for reducing unwanted mineral residues in the excreta, which could aid in reducing environmental issues related to animal breeding [2]. In the bakery industry, they are used to improve dough properties [4], while in other sectors, they serve purposes such as clarifying fruit juices, prebleaching pulp for paper production to reduce the use of harsh chemicals, among others [5].

On the other hand, over the last decade XOS have gained attention given their prebiotic effect in humans and animals at low doses [6, 3]. The documented health benefits of XOS include a reduction in blood cholesterol, increase in calcium absorption, antioxidant effects, maintenance of gastrointestinal health, reduced colon cancer risk, cytotoxic effect on human leukaemic cells and benefits to patients with type two diabetes mellitus [7]. Currently, the vast majority of the proposed methods for XOS production use xylan extracted from lignocellulosic raw material, as a way of utilizing waste produced by other industries [8].

Considering the above, the interest in producing xylanases has been increasing. Acevedo et al. [9] successfully cloned a GH10 xylanase of Antarctic origin (Xyl-L) [9], and later expressed it in E. coli, where it proved to have promising activity at low temperatures [10]. Cold-active enzymes tend to have a broader substrate specificity, compared to their thermophilic counterparts, and are also energy efficient, as they have lower optimal temperatures [11]. An example of cold-active xylanase application is its use in bread dough for improving dough stability and flexibility, as well as for increasing bread volume and crumb structure [12,13,14]. Additionally, they are highly preferred as they can avoid the occurrence of undesirable chemical reactions at higher temperatures due to their rapid heat-inactivation, derived from their structural thermolability [10, 11, 15].

As xylanases have a large potential for application within the food and nutraceutical industry, the host organism used for their heterologous production becomes a relevant factor, mainly because of final product safety. Furthermore, for industrial production purposes, certain variables must also be considered, such as production yields and required purification steps, in order to establish an economically viable process. Thus, different expression hosts have been considered for the production of recombinant xylanases, such as Aspergillus and Pichia pastoris (syn Komagataella spp). While products obtained from both of them have received GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) certification, the latter tends to be chosen for large-scale recombinant protein production, due to its easier handling. P. pastoris has been used successfully to produce different recombinant active and functional xylanolytic enzymes. In addition, it is able to secrete proteins into the culture supernatant, which is a helpful feature in large-scale protein production [8, 16, 17].

Regarding all of the above, this study explored the secretory production of the cold-adapted xylanase Xyl-L, using P. pastoris as host. The ability of this enzyme to produce XOS was measured under different conditions, and the production of XOS with commonly used flours as substrates was also tested.

Materials and methods

Materials

Beechwood xylan (purity > 95%), and XOS standards (xylobiose, xylotriose, xylotetraose, xylopentaose, and xylohexaose) were purchased from Megazymes (Wicklow, Ireland). Bradford reagent (Protein Assay Dye) was purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, USA). Anti-foam Itapon DG160 was kindly donated by Química Italquim (Santiago, Chile). Whole wheat flour, rye flour, oatmeal flour (La Fuente Natural, Santiago, Chile) and all-purpose flour (Selecta, Santiago, Chile) were purchased at a local supermarket. All other materials used were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

Media

Synthetic screening medium ASMv6 contained per liter: 22 g citric acid monohydrate, 6.30 g (\(\hbox {NH}_4\))\(_2\) \(\hbox {HPO}_4\), 0.49 g \(\hbox {MgSO}_4\) \(\cdot\) 7\(\hbox {H}_2\)O, 2.64 g KCl, 0.0535 g \(\hbox {CaCl}_2\) \(\cdot\) 2\(\hbox {H}_2\)O, 1.47 mL PTM0 trace metals without biotin, 0.4 mg biotin; pH was set to 6.5 with KOH.

PTM0 trace metals contain per liter: 6.0 g \(\hbox {CuSO}_4\) \(\cdot\) 5\(\hbox {H}_2\)O, 0.09 g KI, 3 g \(\hbox {MnSO}_4\) \(\cdot\) H2O, 0.2 g \(\hbox {Na}_2\) \(\hbox {MoO}_4\) \(\cdot\) 2\(\hbox {H}_2\)O, 0.02 g \(\hbox {H}_3\) \(\hbox {BO}_3\), 0.5 g \(\hbox {CoCl}_2\), 42.2 g \(\hbox {ZnSO}_4\) \(\cdot\) 7\(\hbox {H}_2\)O, 65.0 g \(\hbox {FeSO}_4\) \(\cdot\) 7\(\hbox {H}_2\)O, and 5.0 mL \(\hbox {H}_2\) \(\hbox {SO}_4\) (95% -98%).

Strain constructions

The ORF encoding secreted Xyl-L gene (US 8679814 B2 [18]) from Psycrobacter sp. (without its predicted native 25 aa N-terminal signal peptide) was synthesized with codon optimization for expression in P. pastoris by GeneArt (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany). A C-terminal His6-tag was added. Molecular cloning was performed using Golden Gate Assembly (GGA) following the methodology of Prielhofer et al. (2017) [19]. Briefly, on the first GGA round, the synthetic Xyl-L gene was ligated in frame with the N-terminal Saccharomyces cerevisiae alpha-mating factor leader for secretion into the BB1 backbone plasmid, using the restriction enzyme BsaI. Then, E. coli DH10B cells were transformed with the plasmid and selected on LB agar containing 50 \(\mu\)g/mL kanamycin. In the second GGA round, the promoter, the ORF and the terminator were ligated into the BB3aZ vector backbone, using the enzyme Bpil. Two different promoters were used, the constitutive GAP promoter and the strong methanol-inducible AOX1 promoter. The plasmid was transformed into E. coli DH10B and positive transformants were selected using 50 \(\mu\)g/mL Zeocin. The final constructions were checked by PCR and sequencing, using the J77 (5’-GAGGTATGTAGGCGGTGCTA-3’) and bb3zeorv (5’-TTAGTATGCTGTGCTTGGGTG-3’) primers.

Then, 5 \(\mu\)g of correctly assembled plasmid were linearized with AscI enzyme, eluted in 15 \(\mu\)L of water, and used to transform 50 \(\mu\)L of electro-competent P. pastoris BT3445(CBS7435 MutS). Transformants were selected and isolated on YPD plates containing 50 \(\mu\)g/mL zeocin.

Selected P. pastoris \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\)-XyL strains were transformed with a plasmid encoding for P. pastoris protein disulfide isomerase (PDI1) or the Hac1p transcription activator [20]. Transformants were selected using 100 \(\mu\)g/mL nourseothricin and 200 \(\mu\)g/mL hygromycin, respectively.

Small scale screening cultures

Small scale screening cultures were carried out in 24 deep-well plates (24-DWP) following the protocol by Zahrl et al. [20]. Per construct at least 7 P. pastoris transformants were tested [21]. Briefly, 2 mL of YPD + Zeocin were inoculated with a single P. pastoris transformant and incubated at \(25^{\circ }\)C and 280 rpm for 24 h. Then, the plate was centrifuged at 2000 × g for 5 min and the resulting cell pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of 2X ASM media by shaking for 2 min. The \(\hbox {OD}_{600}\) of each pre-culture was measured in a microtiter plate, for calculating the inoculum volume so the induced culture could start with an \(\hbox {OD}_{600}\) equal to 4.

The calculated volume was added to 1 mL of 2X ASM media in a new 24-DWP, followed by 1 mL of polysaccharide (PS) with glucose-releasing enzyme (PSE) in a 2-fold concentration. Depending on the promoter, each media had variations: for methanol-induced screenings there was a final concentration of 0.35% enzyme, 25 g/L PS plus methanol shots of 0.5%, 1%, 1% and 1% after 3, 19, 27 and 43 h, respectively [50 mL PSE for \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\): 25 mL PS + 25 mL water + 0.35 mL enzyme (2-fold concentrated)]; for \(\hbox {P}_{GAP}\), a final concentration of 0.7% enzyme and 50 g/L PS [50 mL PSE for \(\hbox {P}_{GAP}\): 50 mL PS + 0.7 mL enzyme (2-fold concentrated)] was used.

After 48 h of cultivation at \(25^{\circ }\)C and 280 rpm, cultures were harvested by taking a 1 mL sample from the culture broth and putting it into a pre-weighted 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. Centrifugation was performed at 13,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was transferred into a fresh tube and the recombinant protein production was checked by SDS-PAGE and activity assays as described in "Activity assay" Section, while the pellet in the initial tube was weighted to determine the wet-cell weight (WCW).

Fed-batch bioreactor cultures

Fed-batch bioreactor cultivations were carried out using a mixed glycerol/methanol feeding strategy as described in Zahrl et al. [22]. Thus, each strain was inoculated into wide-necked, baffled, covered 250 mL shake flasks filled with 50 mL of YPG [per liter: 20 g peptone, 10 g yeast extract, 20 g glycerol] and incubated at \(28^{\circ }\)C and shaken at 150 rpm, overnight (Pre-culture 1). In the morning, the Pre-culture 2 was made from 100 mL YPG in a 1 L wide-necked, baffled shake flask, which was inoculated with the appropriate volume from Pre-Culture 1, so it reached an \(\hbox {OD}_{600}\) ranging from 0.95 to 1.05. This way, over a 10 h incubation period at \(28^{\circ }\)C with agitation of 150 rpm, the Pre-Culture 2 reached an \(\hbox {OD}_{600}\) of 20, which could be used for the inoculation of the bioreactor.

For the fed-batches, bioreactors with a working volume of 3 L were used (Minifors, Infors, Switzerland), and each culture was performed in duplicate. All the bioreactors were filled with 700 mL BSM-media at a pH of approximately 5.5, and then were individually inoculated with 70 mL of the Pre-Culture 2 to reach an \(\hbox {OD}_{600}\) ranging from 1 to 2.

The batch phase on glycerol used for biomass generation usually lasted around 14 h. During the initial glycerol fed-batch phase, glycerol was fed during 8 h at a rate defined by the equation 4.55 + 0.525\(\cdot\)t (g/h). The next phase lasted 18 h in total, where a mixed feed of glycerol/methanol was supplied; the glycerol feed rate was set by the equation 4.375 + 0.2275\(\cdot\)t (g/h), while the methanol feed was defined by the equation 1.26 + 0.0875\(\cdot\)t (g/h). The final phase lasted around 72 h and the feeding was changed to only methanol, at a rate set by the equation 3.85 + 0.028\(\cdot\)t (g/h).

During the initial batch phase the temperature was set to \(28^{\circ }\)C, in the last 2 h (before initiating the production phase) it was decreased to \(24^{\circ }\)C and kept at this level throughout the remaining process. The pH dropped to 5.0 and was controlled to be maintained at this level using 25% ammonium. Oxygen saturation was set to 30% throughout the whole process (cascade control: stirrer, flow, oxygen supplementation); stirring was applied between 1000 and 1200 rpm, with an air flow range of 2–4 vvm. Foaming was controlled by the addition of anti-foam agent Itapon DG 160 on demand.

Samples were taken from the bioreactors twice a day, which were used to measure \(\hbox {OD}_{600}\) using a spectrophotometer (Biochrom Libra S50 UV) and then centrifuged for 5 min at 15,000 rpm. The supernatant was collected for analyzing Xyl-L production using SDS-PAGE and activity assays as described in "Activity assay" Section. Protein concentration was also measured as described in "Protein quantification" Section. The cell pellet was weighted and used to register wet-cell weight.

Purification of recombinant Xyl-L

Cultures were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min at \(4^{\circ }\)C (Sorvall, Fxy rotor). The supernatant was collected and filtered using 0.2 nm filters and mixed with an equal volume of Binding Buffer (Tris–HCl 50 mM pH 7.0, NaCl 500 mM, Imidazole 15 mM), following the methodology of Lehuedé et al. [23]. Chromatographic steps were carried out on FPLC system AKTA™ Avant 25, where 50 mL of the samples were loaded in a Histrap® FF 1 mL column, which was preequilibrated with Binding Buffer. Then, the column was washed with 20 mL of Binding Buffer. The elution was carried out in 8 mL of a linear gradient from 0 to 100% at a 0.5 mL/min flow of Elution Buffer (Tris–HCl 50 mM pH 7.0, NaCl 500 mM, Imidazole 500 mM) and collected in a 96 deep-well plate in 1 mL fractions.

For desalting, the total sample was loaded on a 52 mL Hiprep 26/10 desalting column preequilibrated with Tris–HCl pH 7.5 20 mM buffer. The elution step was performed by circulating 1.5 column volumes at 10 mL/min of the mentioned buffer. The elution was collected in 2 mL fractions and its absorbance at 280 nm was recorded. The fraction corresponding to the first 280 nm absorbance peak was placed together and stored at \(4^{\circ }\)C for further analysis.

Enzyme characterization

Protein quantification

The quantification of protein in solution was made using the Bradford Method [24], where 200 \(\mu\)L of Bradford reagent (Bio-rad) were mixed with 5 \(\mu\)L of the enzyme containing solution. After 10 min, the absorbance at 595 nm was measured using a microplate reader (SPECTROstar Omega) and then was associated with protein concentration through a BSA standard curve.

Activity assay

The assays to determine Xyl-L activity were based on Bailey et al. [25], following the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method using xylose as a standard. Thus, the assays were performed in 1.5 mL tubes in triplicate, where 950 \(\mu\)L of reaction buffer (beechwood xylan 1%, Tris–HCl 50 mM pH 8.0, \(\hbox {CaCl}_2\) 4 mM) were pre-incubated at \(20^{\circ }\)C for 15 min. The enzymatic reaction was initiated when 50 \(\mu\)L of the enzymatic sample were added, followed by incubation at \(25^{\circ }\)C for 30 min in a thermo shaker (MB100-4A, Hangzhou Allsheng Instruments). As a negative control, one assay triplicate replaced the enzyme for the same volume of Milli-Q water.

Then, 100 \(\mu\)L were taken from the reaction solution and immediately mixed with 100 \(\mu\)L of DNS and incubated for 5 min at \(95^{\circ }\)C in a thermocycler (Bioer GeneExplorer®). After cooling at room temperature, 100 \(\mu\)L of the reaction volume were placed in a 96 well plate to measure its absorbance at 550 nm using a microplate reader (SPECTROstar Omega). The reducing sugars generated by the enzymatic reaction were estimated using xylose as a standard curve. One enzymatic unit (U) was defined as the \(\mu\)mol of reducing sugars released per minute by the action of the enzyme, under given pH and temperature conditions, using xylose as the standard.

Effect of temperature on Xyl-L activity

The effect of temperature on the enzyme activity was evaluated by carrying out activity assays as previously described, but varying the temperature used, ranging from \(4^{\circ }\)C to \(64^{\circ }\)C, using a thermocycler Bioer GeneExplorer®). Relative activity was calculated using the optimal temperature as 100%.

Thermal stability of Xyl-L

The remaining enzyme activity was measured at \(25^{\circ }\)C as previously described, after incubating Xyl-L during 10 min at a set temperature, ranging between \(30^{\circ }\)C and \(95^{\circ }\)C, in a thermocycler (Bioer GeneExplorer®).

Effect of pH on Xyl-L activity

To evaluate optimal pH, different buffers were used. Acetate 50 mM buffer was used for pH from 3.7 to 5.6, Tris–HCl 50 mM for pH ranging from 5.8 to 8.0 and Glycine-NaOH 50 mM for pH between 8.6 and 10.6. Every enzymatic reaction was performed at \(25^{\circ }\)C. Relative activity was calculated using the optimal pH as 100%.

Kinetic parameters

Activity was calculated varying the concentration of beechwood xylan from 0.16 to 40 mg/mL. Activity assay were performed at \(25^{\circ }\)C and pH 7.5. The kinetic parameters were calculated in a linear regression using the GraphPad Prism 8® software.

Effect of different metal ions on Xyl-L activity

To evaluate how the presence of different ions affected the enzyme catalytic capacity, an ionic compound (\(\hbox {CaCl}_2\), \(\hbox {MnCl}_2\), KCl, KI, \(\hbox {MgCl}_2\) or NaCl) was added to the enzymatic reaction mixture at 5 and 10 mM. A positive control was also performed by adding the same volume of MilliQ water. The activity assays were carried out as described earlier.

Enzymatic production of XOS from different flours

Several enzymatic reactions were performed using the recombinant XyL-L produced, varying the substrate used, so later the production of XOS could be compared using the HPLC system Shimadzu Nexera LC40. Activity assays were performed in triplicate; in each case, 4 mL of reaction buffer were added, containing 2% of the respective flour (whole wheat flour, rye flour, oatmeal flour or all-purpose flour) in Tris–HCl 50 mM pH 8.0. A positive control was performed using xylan as substrate, using the same reaction buffer previously described in "Activity assay" Section, and a negative control (without including Xyl-L) was also performed for each substrate. The enzymatic reaction was initiated when 1.5 mL of Xyl-L were added and the whole solution was incubated at \(25^{\circ }\)C for 24 h.

Afterwards, a 1 mL sample was taken and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant was filtered using 0.22 nm syringe filters for HPLC analysis. Briefly, 10 \(\mu\)L of samples were injected into the Rezek RSO oligosaccharide Ag+ 200 × 10 mm chromatography column at \(85^{\circ }\)C, using MilliQ water as mobile phase, at a 0.3 mL/min flow. Refraction index (IR) was measured during the run to identify the degradation products. Xylobiose, xylotriose, xylotetraose, xylopentaose and xylohexaose (Megazyme) were used as standards.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate, except for the bioreactors, which were made in duplicates. The experimental data were analyzed using the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test with a 95% confidence level, in the GraphPad Prism \(8^\circledR\) software.

Results

Xyl-L strains comparison

Xyl-L, from the GH10 family, could be successfully produced and secreted by P. pastoris, using the S. cerevisiae alpha-mating factor leader for secretion. Figure 1a shows that a higher activity per WCW ratio was obtained by the \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\) based strains in methanol-induced screening cultures, compared to the \(\hbox {P}_{GAP}\) based strain, at both 24 h and 48 h of cultivation according to the activity assay.

Given these results, the \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\)-XyL parental strain was selected to be co-transformed with potential folding and secretion promoting factors that had shown to increase heterologous protein production in previous studies [26]. Either the HAC1 gene, which encodes the induced version of the unfolded protein response (UPR) transcription factor Hac1 [26, 27] or protein disulfide isomerase (PDI1), responsible for the formation of disulfide bonds in eukaryotic cells [28] were chosen.

However, as shown in Fig. 1b, no significant effect was detected when testing and comparing the specific activity of the produced Xyl-L between the engineered \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\)-XyL strains and the parental strain, in screening cultures. In contrast, Pdi1 even seems to get secreted by itself when overexpressed as an additional band at the molecular weight of approximately 52 kDa appeared, which was confirmed to be Pdi1 by LC-MS/MS. Xyl-L was confirmed to be the band at the molecular weight of approximately 90 kDa, although its predicted molecular weight was 80 kDa. The differences in size could be attributed to glycosylations made by P. pastoris during the Xyl-L expression inside the cell [29]. Both of these bands can be seen in Fig. 1c.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Xyl-L in small scale screenings.a Xyl-L activity in the supernatant normalized over biomass produced by either PAOX1 or PGAP based P. pastoris strains. 15 individual transformants were cultivated in glucoselimited small scale screenings with (PAOX1) or without (PGAP ) methanol induction. ANOVA test was performed to the results; ** indicates that there are significant differences between the corresponding data (p≤0.05). b Influence of potential secretion promoting factors on Xyl-L activity of the PAOX1-XyL parent. c SDS-PAGE analysis of Xyl-L strains with different promoters, and PAOX1 strains co-transformed with HAC1 and PDI1. The lanes titles indicate: Ladder for Molecular Weight Protein Ladder; AOX+PDI, for the PAOX1-XyL strain co-transformed with PDI1; AOX+HAC, for the PAOX1-XyL strain co-transformed with HAC1; GAP, for the Xyl-L strain containing PGAP ; GAP, for the Xyl-L strain containing PGAP ; AOX, for the Xyl-L strain containing PAOX. Xyl-L band is inside the yellow box at about 90 kDa, while PDI1 is inside the yellow box around 52 kDa

Fed-batch bioreactor Xyl-L production

The parental strain \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\)-XyL was chosen for fed-batch cultivation in bioreactors, using a previously established protocol for methanol/glycerol co-feeding that leads to high productivity of secreted proteins [20]. The bioreactor cultures were divided into four different phases: batch, glycerol fed-batch, glycerol/methanol fed-batch, and methanol fed-batch. As shown in Fig. 2, when analyzing the cultures supernatant, xylanase activity starts to appear after 27 h, when methanol induction starts, and reaches its peak right before the cultures were stopped.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Bioreactor performance for P. pastoris \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\)-XyL. Biomass formation (green circles) and volumetric xylanase activity profile (red square) of the culture

Characterization of Xyl-L

The produced Xyl-L was purified and used to perform activity assays as previously described, and protein concentration was also measured. With this, the specific activity obtained for Xyl-L was 5.101 ± 0.216 U/mg.

Figure 3 shows how the enzymatic rate changed when varying the substrate (xylan) concentration in the reaction mixture for Xyl-L, at pH 7.5 and \(25^{\circ }\)C. Thus, the kinetic parameters were obtained resulting in a Km value of 3.5 mg/mL, kcat of 9.16 \(\hbox {s}^{-1}\) and therefore a catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of 2.62 mL \(\hbox {mg}^{-1}\) \(\hbox {s}{-1}\).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Kinetic parameters for recombinant Xyl-L, obtained at \(25^{\circ }\)C, pH 7.5. The kinetic parameters were calculated by Lineweaver Burke plot using soluble xylan as a substrate

The effect of pH is shown in Fig. 4, measured at \(25^{\circ }\)C. The enzyme had a relative activity of over 80% (with 100% being the highest measured activity) at pH between 5.6 and 8.6, and dropped drastically in pH ranges under 5 and over 10.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of pH on the activity of recombinant Xyl-L. The purified enzyme was incubated in different buffers (acetate 50 mM pH 3,7–5,6; phosphate 50 mM pH 5,8–8 and glycine NaOH 50 mM pH 8,6–10,6) for 30 min at \(25^{\circ }\)C

Figure 5a shows how temperature affects relative activity of Xyl-L, measured at pH 7.5. The enzyme showed maximum activity at \(42^{\circ }\)C, but remained with over 80% of its relative activity between \(37^{\circ }\)C and \(44^{\circ }\)C. Outside said range, the relative activity begins to drop, but still remains over 40% between \(26^{\circ }\)C and \(45^{\circ }\)C, while over \(48^{\circ }\)C the enzyme loses almost all its catalytic capacity.

Meanwhile, Fig. 5b presents the thermal stability of Xyl-L, showing that relative activity remained around 90% after heating the enzyme at temperatures between \(30^{\circ }\)C and \(37^{\circ }\)C, and then performing activity assays at \(25^{\circ }\)C. When heating to temperatures over \(37^{\circ }\)C, the relative activity dropped continuously, registering around 20% activity at temperatures above \(80^{\circ }\)C.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Influence of temperature on Xyl-L activity and Xyl-L thermal stability. a Effect of temperature on activity. The activity assay was performed at different temperatures and relative activity was calculated using the optimal temperature as 100%. b Thermal stability of recombinant Xyl-L, where the purified enzyme was incubated for 10 min at different temperatures and then the activity assay was performed. Relative activity was calculated using the measured activity at \(25^{\circ }\)C as 100%

Figure 6 shows how the activity of Xyl-L was significantly enhanced by \(\hbox {CaCl}_2\), \(\hbox {MgCl}_2\) and KI at 5 mM and 10 mM concentrations, and also by KCl and NaCl at 5 mM concentration. Simultaneously, the enzyme is shown to be strongly inhibited with \(\hbox {MnCl}_2\) at 5 mM and 10 mM concentrations.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of different salts on activity of recombinant Xyl-L. Relative activity was calculated using no salt as 100%. ANOVA test was performed to the results; ** indicates that there are significant differences between the corresponding ion concentration and its counterpart with no salt added (p \(\le\) 0.05); * indicates that said difference comes from p \(\le\) 0,1; bars without * indicates that said difference is not significant

Analysis of hydrolysis products using different flour and beechwood xylan as a substrate

Different types of flours commonly used in the food and feed industry were tested as xylan sources and added to the reaction mixture as substrates, while xylane from beechwood was use as a representative of a purified substrate from hardwood. Interestingly, xylo-based oligosacaride with a depolymerization degree (DP) of 2 (X2) was detected and quantified in whole wheat flour, rye flour, oatmeal flour, and all-purpose flour, while XOS with DP 3 was additionally obtained in whole wheat flour, as shown in Table 1. When beechwood xylan was used as substrate it resulted in the production of XOS with a DP 2, 3 and 4 (X2, X3, X4).

Table 1 Xylo-oligosaccharides concentration found by HPLC analysis after enzymatic reaction of Xyl-L with different flours as substrate

Discussion

Cold-adapted xylanase Xyl-L was successfully produced in a secreted form in P. pastoris in small scale screenings and fed-batch bioreactor cultivations. The \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\) based methanol-induced expression strategy outperformed constitutive \(\hbox {P}_{GAP}\), which agrees with previous studies comparing production of \(\beta\)-xylanase from Penicillium citrinum in P. pastoris [30].

Regarding the addition of genes encoding proteins that could aid in the expression of Xyl-L in P. pastoris (Fig. 1b), overexpression of either PDI1 or HAC1 failed to improve the productivity of secreted Xyl-L. This indicates that protein folding and secretion seem not to be a bottleneck for Xyl-L production in the selected best-performing P. pastoris strain. Contrarily, it was noted that additional bands or lower amounts of Xyl-L were detected in the supernatant of both PDI1 and HAC1 transformed strains, making their overexpression detrimental for further purification of the Xyl-L enzyme (Fig. 1c).

Considering these results, the \(\hbox {P}_{AOX1}\)-XyL strain was chosen to perform bioreactor cultures. While the predicted molecular weight of Xyl-L was set in 80 kDa, the band associated to the enzyme in Fig. 1c is found around 90 kDa. The differences in size between Xyl-L produced in E. coli and in P. pastoris, could be attributed to glycosylations made by the latter during the expression of the enzyme within the cell [29]. During fed- batch cultivation, the peak of the activity was obtained after 90 hrs. Following this time point, Xyl-L began to be degraded, observed in SDS-PAGE (data not shown), which could be attributed to the endogenous secretion of proteases in the latest stage of the culture [31]. Considering the specific activity of the purified XyL-L, a product concentration of 0.59 g/L was obtained from the fermentation.

Regarding the kinetic parameters obtained, generally Km values for xylanases are between 0.5 and 5 mg/mL, which positions the Km of Xyl-L (3.5 mg/mL) within the expected range [32]. In addition, previously reported values for cold-adapted xylanases vary greatly considering their origin: r-XynA from Sorangium cellulosum showed values of 25.77 mg/mL for Km and 6.84 \(\hbox {s}{-1}\) for kcat [32], for the enzymatic reaction over beechwood xylan at \(30^{\circ }\)C, while XynA from Glaciecola mesophila registered values of 1.22 mg/mL for Km and 69 \(\hbox {s}{-1}\) for kcat, for the same substrate at same said temperature [33]. Given this data, making accurate comparisons becomes difficult, but it is still possible to argue that kcat for Xyl-L (9.16 \(\hbox {s}{-1}\) at \(25^{\circ }\)C) is similar to the kcat reported value for S. cellulosum.

The measurement of the effect of pH on Xyl-L activity showed that its optimal pH range is more extended compared to previously reported pH ranges for xylanases of bacterial origin, which tend to be optimal in neutral to alkaline pHs [34]. Thus, the optimal pH range of Xyl-L (which is found between pH 5.6 to 8.6) makes it suitable for most industrial applications, given most of them are performed at these pH values [34].

In relation to the temperature effect on Xyl-L activity, compared to its previous expression in E. coli, several changes regarding the optimal temperature range were observed. In P. pastoris, Xyl-L lost over 30% of relative activity at \(15^{\circ }\)C (compared to the result in E. coli), while the optimum temperature went up from \(35^{\circ }\)C to 42. Moreover, compared to the xylanse Xyl-L produce in E. coli the thermostability of Xyl-L produced in P. pastoris seem to be improved, this could be the effect of the glycosylation present in the Xyl-L produced in P. pastoris as in some cases glycosylations have been shown to improve the thermostability of reported enzymes produced in P. pastoris [35, 36].

Furthermore, it has been proven that similar cold-adapted enzymes have their optimal temperature range under \(30^{\circ }\)C, suggesting that the expression of Xyl-L in P. pastoris produces an enzyme with an optimal temperature range higher than the average. This feature makes Xyl-L a candidate in the bread making processes for generating XOS within the bread, considering that the temperatures used in the leavening stages are usually around \(36^{\circ }\)C [37] or under \(35^{\circ }\)C [38].

The loss of activity observed when the enzyme is exposed to temperatures above \(45^{\circ }\)C (Fig. 5b) is likely due to enzyme denaturation, as heat tends to break the three-dimensional structure of the protein [39]. Xyl-L exhibits a thermal stability behavior similar to other cold-adapted enzymes, which tend to have high specific activity at room temperature, but poor thermal stability. This is believed to be due to the high flexibility that the enzyme adopts to catalyze reactions in cold environments [15, 38]. This feature also makes Xyl-L ideal for bread making processes, as it rapidly loses most of its activity after temperatures begin to rise, preventing unwanted reactions due to prolonged activity, such as changing the crumb structure and altering the consistency of bread [15].

The \(\hbox {Ca}^{2+}\) activation observed for Xyl-L in Fig. 6 is consistent with what has been previously described for other xylanases from the GH10 family [40]. Inactivation of Xyl-L by \(\hbox {Mn}^{2+}\) also has backing data, as it has proven to be an inhibitor of a certain group of xylanases, particularly in xylanases of marine origin [33, 41].

Given that xylan is an abundant natural polymer found in various types of plants, the use of Xyl-L for the production of XOS using edible raw materials was explored, using commercial beechwood xylan as standard. While grain flours such as rye, wheat and oatmeal are complex substrates, beechwood xylan is extracted and purified from hardwood, making it chemically and structurally different than the mentioned flours, which mainly contain xylan in the form of arabinoxylan [1]. Moreover, grains contain xylanase inhibitors [13], that can interfere with xylanase activity. However, the results obtained (Table 1) show that Xyl-L is able to degrade these complex substrates and also produce XOS directly from them. This results suggest that Xyl-L can be potentially used to generate food-grade prebiotics employing certain raw materials used in food production.

Furthermore, compared to the control, Xyl-L released other products into the soluble fraction of the enzymatic digestion, especially when a high fiber flour was used as a substrate A1. Some of these products were eluted at a time point similar to those of the xylotetraose and xylopentaose standards. The diversified number of substitution patterns in XOS, such as arabinose, acetyl groups and D-glucuronic acid, could explain the differences in the retention time obtained by HPLC [42], since these heteroxylans are commonly found in complex substrates [2, 8].

Currently, most of the enzymatic methods implemented to produce XOS, use extracted and purified xylan from agroindustrial by-products [43]. However, novel proposed processes use recombinant xylanase producing microorganisms in fermentative steps, in order to generate XOS directly from residues of the food and brewages industry [42, 44, 45]. To date, studies concerning the utilization of xylanases to produce XOS directly from a grain to make functional food, remain sparse [46, 47]. Nevertheless, the results shown in this study suggest that XOS can be obtained from flours used in the food and feed industry, using the recombinant xylanase Xyl-L expressed in P. pastoris, showing the potential for its application in the nutraceutical and food industries. Further improvements are being studied for the industrial applications of Xyl-L.

Conclusions

Enzymes have a long history of safe use in food processing and animal feed. The host used for expressing proteins at the industrial level becomes relevant for the affordable and safe production of recombinant enzymes that can be used as food additives. In this study, it was shown that Xyl-L, a cold-adapted GH10 xylanase of antarctic origin, can be successfully expressed in P pastoris. Its characterization resulted in a specific activity of 5.10 ± 0.21 U/mg, at pH 7.5 and \(25^{\circ }\)C, using beechwood xylan, with a Km of 3.5 mg/mL and a kcat of 9.16 \(\hbox {s}{-1}\). The raise in the optimal temperature of Xyl-L produced in P. pastoris compared to its E. coli counterpart (from 37 to \(42^{\circ }\)C), might be due to the tendency of P. pastoris to add glycosylations to the three-dimensional structure of the recombinant produced proteins.

In addition, Xyl-L showed activity against different flour substrates used in the food industry, producing XOS with a DP ranging from 2 to 4. All these results suggest the potential of Xyl-L produced in P. pastoris for its application in the nutraceutical and food industries. Further studies focusing on bioprocesses optimization might still be necessary to achieve higher yields and specific xylanase activity.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ye ZH, Zhong R. Outstanding questions on xylan biosynthesis. Plant Sci. 2022. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Polizeli MLTM, Rizzatti ACS, Monti R, Terenzi HF, Jorge JA, Amorim DS. Xylanases from fungi: properties and industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;67:577–91. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-005-1904-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amorim C, Silvério SC, Prather KLJ, Rodrigues LR. From lignocellulosic residues to market: Production and commercial potential of xylooligosaccharides. Biotechnol Adv. 2019. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pavlovich-Abril A. Perspective chapter: biaxial extensional viscosity in wheat doughs —effect of the use of xylanases. In: Dutta, A. (ed.) Advances in rheology of materials. IntechOpen: London 2023. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5772/intechopen.108045.

  5. Beg Q, Kapoor M, Mahajan L, Hoondal G. Microbial xylanases and their industrial applications: a review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;56:326–38. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s002530100704.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mattos PBG, Souza Vandenberghe LP, Valladares-Diestra KK, Neyra LCR, Vieira S, Letti LAJ, Soccol CR. Recent developments in xylooligosaccharides: sustainable production, characterization, beneficial properties and applications. Food Research Int. 2024. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akpinar O, Erdogan K, Bostanci S. Enzymatic production of Xylooligosaccharide from selected agricultural wastes. Food Bioprod Process. 2009;87(2):145–51. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.carres.2009.01.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Santibáñez L, Henríquez C, Corro-Tejeda R, Bernal S, Armijo B, Salazar O. Xylooligosaccharides from lignocellulosic biomass: a comprehensive review. Carbohydr Polym. 2021. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Acevedo JP, Reyes F, Parra LP, Salazar O, Andrews BA, Asenjo JA. Cloning of complete genes for novel hydrolytic enzymes from Antarctic sea water bacteria by use of an improved genome walking technique. J Biotechnol. 2008;133:277–86. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.10.004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Acevedo JP, Reetz MT, Asenjo JA, Parra LP. One-step combined focused epPCR and saturation mutagenesis for thermostability evolution of a new cold-active xylanase. Enzym Microbial Technol. 2017;100:60–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.02.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Santiago M, Ramírez-Sarmiento CA, Zamora RA, Parra LP. Discovery, molecular mechanisms, and industrial applications of cold-active enzymes. Front Microbiol. 2016. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Li X, Zhang L, Jiang Z, Liu L, Wang J, Zhong L, Yang T, Zhou Q, Dong W, Zhou J, Ye X, Li Z, Huang Y, Cui Z. A novel cold-active GH8 xylanase from cellulolytic myxobacterium and its application in food industry. Food Chem. 2022. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dornez E, Verjans P, Arnaut F, Delcour JA, Courtin CM. Use of psychrophilic xylanases provides insight into the xylanase functionality in bread making. J Agricult Food Chem. 2011. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1021/jf201752g.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Acevedo JP, Reetz MT, Asenjo JA, Parra LP. Improvement of the quality of wheat bread by addition of glycoside hydrolase family 10 xylanases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90:509–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-011-3088-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerday C, Aittaleb M, Bentahir M, Chessa JP, Claverie P, Collins T, D’Amico S, Dumont J, Garsoux G, Georlette D, Hoyoux A, Lonhienne T, Meuwis MA, Feller G. Cold-adapted enzymes: from fundamentals to biotechnology. Trend Biotechnol. 2000;18(3):103–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S0167-7799(99)01413-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Basit A, Jiang W, Rahim K. Xylanase and its industrial applications. In: Basso TP, Basso TO, Basso LC, editors. Biotechnological applications of biomass. London: IntechOpen; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spohner SC, Müller H, Quitmann H, Czermak P. Expression of enzymes for the usage in food and feed industry with Pichia pastoris. J Biotechnol. 2015;202:118–34. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.01.027.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Asenjo J, Andrews B, Acevedo J, Parra L, Burzio J. Protein and DNA Sequence Encoding a Cold-adapted Xylanase. US 8679814 B2. 2014. https://lens.org/161-754-047-378-297.

  19. Prielhofer R, Barrero JJ, Steuer S, Gassler T, Zahrl R, Baumann K, Sauer M, Mattanovich D, Gasser B, Marx H. GoldenPiCS: a golden gate-derived modular cloning system for applied synthetic biology in the yeast Pichia pastoris. BMC Syst Biol. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12918-017-0492-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zahrl RJ, Prielhofer R, Burgard J, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. Synthetic activation of yeast stress response improves secretion of recombinant proteins. New Biotechnol. 2023;73:19–28. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.nbt.2023.01.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Palma A, Rettenbacher LA, Moilanen A, Saaranen M, Gasser B, Ruddock LW. Komagataella phaffii Erp41 is a protein disulfide isomerase with unprecedented disulfide bond catalyzing activity when coupled to glutathione. J BiolChem. 2024. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.105746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zahrl RJ, Prielhofer R, Ata Baumann K, Mattanovich D, Pushing Gasser B. pulling proteins into the yeast secretory pathway enhances recombinant protein secretion. Metabolic Engin. 2022;74:36–48. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ymben.2022.08.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lehuede L, Cordova A, Rodriguez S, Astudillo-Castro C, Vera C, Salazar O. A sequential bioconversion-purification process to produce high purity xylo-oligosaccharides (XOS) from Nothophagus pumilio sawdust wastes. Industrial Crops Product. 2024. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1–2):248–54. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bailey MJ, Biely P, Poutanen K. Interlaboratory testing of methods for assay of xylanase activity. J Biotechnol. 1992;23(3):257–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/0168-1656(92)90074-J.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Raschmanová H, Weninger A, Knejzlík Z, Melzoch K, Kovar K. Engineering of the unfolded protein response pathway in Pichia pastoris: enhancing production of secreted recombinant proteins. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;105(11):4397–414. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-021-11336-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Guerfal M, Ryckaert S, Jacobs PP, Ameloot P, Craenenbroeck KV, Derycke R, Callewaert N. The HAC1 gene from Pichia pastoris: characterization and effect of its overexpression on the production of secreted, surface displayed and membrane proteins. Microbial Cell Fact. 2010. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1475-2859-9-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Givol D, Lorenzo FD, Goldberger RF, Anfinsen CB. Disulfide interchange and the three-dimensional structure of proteins. Proceedi National Acad Sci United States Am. 1965;53(3):676–84. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1073/pnas.53.3.676.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Segrest JP, Jackson RL, Andrews EP, Marchesi VT. Human erythrocyte membrane glycoprotein: a re-evaluation of the molecular weight as determined by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Biochem Biophys Research Commun. 1971;44(2):390–5. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/0006-291X(71)90612-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ouephanit C, Boonvitthya N, Bozonnet S, Chulalaksananukul W. High-Level heterologous expression of endo-1,4-\(\beta\)-xylanase from penicillium citrinum in Pichia pastoris X-33 directed through codon optimization and optimized expression. Molecules. 2019;24(19):19–28. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/molecules24193515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sinha J, Plantz BA, Inan M, Meagher MM. Causes of proteolytic degradation of secreted recombinant proteins produced in methylotrophic yeast pichia pastoris: Case study with recombinant ovine interferon. Biotechnol Bioengin. 2004. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/bit.20318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang S, Hu W, Lin X, Wu Z, Li Y. A novel cold-active xylanase from the cellulolytic myxobacterium Sorangium cellulosum So9733-1: gene cloning, expression, and enzymatic characterization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93(4):1503–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-011-3480-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Guo B, Chen XL, Sun CY, Zhou BC, Zhang YZ. Gene cloning, expression and characterization of a new cold-active and salt-tolerant endo-\(\beta\)-1,4-xylanase from marine Glaciecola mesophila KMM 241. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;84(6):1107–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-009-2056-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alokika Singh B. Production, characteristics, and biotechnological applications of microbial xylanases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:8763–84. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-019-10108-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Z, Guo C, Liu L, Huang H. Effects of n-glycosylation on the biochemical properties of recombinant bekl expressed in pichia pastoris. Enzym Microbial Technol. 2018;114: 133463. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2018.03.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Deng B, Yue Y, Yang J, Yang M, Xing Q, Peng H, Wang F, Li M, Ma L, Zhai C. Improving the activity and thermostability of petase from ideonella sakaiensis through modulating its post-translational glycan modification. Commun Biol. 2023. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s42003-023-04413-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yegin S, Altinel B, Tuluk K. A novel extremophilic xylanase produced on wheat bran from Aureobasidium pullulans NRRL Y-2311-1: effects on dough rheology and bread quality. Food Hydrocoll. 2018;81:389–97. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.03.012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Collins T, Gerday C, Feller G. Xylanases, xylanase families and extremophilic xylanases. Fed Eur Microbiol Soc. 2005;29(1):3–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.06.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Dutson TR, Orcutt MW. Chemical changes in proteins produced by thermal processing. J Chem Educ. 1984. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1021/ed061p303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Qiu H, Li Z, Wang H, Zhang H, Li S, Luo X, Song Y, Wang N, He H, Zhou H, Ma W, Zhang T. Molecular and biochemical characterization of a novel cold-active and metal ion-tolerant GH10 xylanase from frozen soil. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2017;31(5):955–63. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/13102818.2017.1359667.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Korkmaz MN, Ozdemir SC, Uzel A. Xylanase production from marine derived Trichoderma pleuroticola 08ÇK001 strain isolated from Mediterranean coastal sediments. J Basic Microbiol. 2017;57(10):839–51. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/jobm.201700135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Amorim C, Silvério SC, Silva SP, Coelho E, Coimbra MA, Prather KLJ, Rodrigues LR. Single-step production of arabino-xylooligosaccharides by recombinant Bacillus subtilis 3610 cultivated in brewers’ spent grain. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;199:546–54. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.017.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou S, Zhou X, Hua X, Yong Q, Liu D, Xu Y. Advances and prospection in preparations, bio-actives and applications of functional xylo-oligosaccharide. Biocatal Agricult Biotechnol. 2024. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.bcab.2024.103297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu J, Liu C, Qiao S, Dong Z, Sun D, Zhu J, Liu W. One-step fermentation for producing xylo-oligosaccharides from wheat bran by recombinant Escherichia coli containing an alkaline xylanase. BMC Biotechnol. 2022. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12896-022-00736-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Silva Menezes B, Rossi DM, Squina F, Ayub MAZ. Comparative production of xylanase and the liberation of xylooligosaccharides from lignocellulosic biomass by Aspergillus brasiliensis BLf1 and recombinant Aspergillus nidulans XynC A773. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2018. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/ijfs.13798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mohammadi M, Norlander S, Hedström M, Adlercreutz P, Grey C. Xylanases and high-degree wet milling improve soluble dietary fibre content in liquid oat base. Food Chem. 2024. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.138619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Basinskiene L, Juodeikiene G, Vidmantiene D, Tenkanen M, Makaravicius T, Bartkiene E. Non-alcoholic beverages from fermented cereals with increased oligosaccharide content. Food Chem. 2016;54(1):36–44. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.17113/ftb.54.01.16.4106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The use of the facilities of the BOKU Mass Spectrometry Core Facility is gratefully acknowledged and the authors thank Dr. Clemens Grünwald-Gruber and Mr. Daniel Maresch for performing the mass spectrometry measurements. Special thanks go to Aitor Gonzalez Titos, Marina Jecmenica, Victor Mendes Honorato, Gabriele Wilt and Viktoria Kowarz from BOKU/ACIB, and Cristóbal Falcon, for their help during cloning, strain generation and data analysis. Also, special thanks to Dr. Oriana Salazar for her advising throughout this work.

Funding

This work was supported by the Centre for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (CeBiB) [PIA FB0001] and the ANID Doctorate Fellowship (21221519). Further support was obtained by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Labour and Economy (BMAW), the Austrian Federal Ministry of Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology (BMK), the Styrian Business Promotion Agency SFG, the Standortagentur Tirol, the Government of Lower Austria, the Business Agency Vienna and BOKU through the COMET Funding Program managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Juan Asenjo: Supervision, Validation, Review editing, Resources. Barbara Andrews: Supervision, Validation, Review editing. Brigitte Gasser: Supervision, Validation, Writing, Review editing, Resources. Sebastián Rodríguez: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Conceptualization, Writing. Carolina González: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing. José Pablo Reyes-Godoy: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastián Rodríguez.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no Competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodríguez, S., González, C., Reyes-Godoy, J.P. et al. Expression and characterization of cold-adapted xylanase Xyl-L in Pichia pastoris for xylooligosaccharide (XOS) preparation. Microb Cell Fact 24, 82 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12934-025-02690-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12934-025-02690-4

Keywords